Turkish high school students’ definitions for parallelograms: appropriate or inappropriate?

References

• Zazkis R, Leikin R. Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square. Educ Stud Math. 2008;69:131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Silfverberg H, Matsuo N. Comparing Japanese and Finnish 6th and 8th graders' ways to apply and construct definitions. In: Figueras O, Cortina J, Alatorre S, Rojano T, Sepúlveda A, editors. Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 4. Morelia: Cinvestav-UMSNH; 2008. p. 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2000. p. 63.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dormolen J, Zaslavsky O. The many facets of a definition: the case of periodicity. J Math Behav. 2003;22:91–196.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan C. Words, definitions and concepts in discourses of mathematics, teaching and learning. Lang Educ. 2005;19(2):103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R, Zazkis R. On the content-dependence of prospective teachers' knowledge: a case of exemplifying definitions. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2010;41:451–466.
   Google Scholar
• Alcock L, Simpson AP. Definitions: dealing with categories mathematically. For Learn Math. 2002;22(2):28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Vinner S. The role of definition in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In: Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Borasi R. Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann; 1992. p. 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Govender R, de Villiers M. A dynamic approach to quadrilateral definitions. Pythagoras. 2004;59:34–45.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers M. To teach definitions in geometry or to teach to define? In: Olivier A, Newstead K, editors. Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 2. Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch; 1998. p. 248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt A, Koç Y. Investigating first year elementary mathematics teacher education students' knowledge of prism. Educ Stud Theory Pract. 2012;12:2949–2952.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham RF, Roberts A. Reducing the mismatch of geometry concept definitions and concept images held by pre-service teachers. Issues Undergrad Math Prep Sch Teach. 2010;1:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Duatepe-Paksu A, Pakmak GS, İymen E. Preservice elementary teachers' identification of necessary and sufficient conditions for a rhombus. Proc Social Behav Sci. 2012;46:3249–3253.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzniak A, Rauscher, JC. On the geometrical thinking of pre-service school teacher. In: Bosch M, editor. Proceedings of the fourth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Sant Feliu de Guíxols: FUNDEMI IQS, Universitat Ramon Llull; 2007. p. 748–756.
   Google Scholar
• Linchevsky L, Vinner S, Karsenty R. To be or not to be minimal? Student teachers views about definitions in geometry. In Geeslin W, Graham K, editors. Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 2. Durham: University of New Hampshire; 1992. p. 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pickreign J. Rectangle and rhombi: how well do pre-service teachers know them? Issues Undergrad Math Prep Sch Teach. 2007;1:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy I, Shriki A. Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers' mathematical knowledge. J Math Behav. 2010;29:11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Marchis I. Preservice primary school teachers' elementary geometry knowledge. Acta Didact Napocensia. 2012;5:33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir P, Tirosh D, Levenson E. Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles. Educ Stud Math. 2008;69:81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Duatepe-Paksu A, İymen E, Pakmak GS. How well elementary teachers identify parallelogram? Educ Stud. 2012;32(2):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Govender R, de Villiers M. Constructive evaluation of definitions in a Sketchpad context. Paper presented at: The Meeting of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa; 2002; Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin R, Winicky-Landman G. On equivalent and nonequivalent definitions II. For Learn Math. 2000;20:24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. Turkish elementary school mathematics curriculum (1–5th grades). Ankara: Ministry of National Education Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Jones K. Learners' understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing. Res Math Educ. 2007;9:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers M. The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For Learn Math. 1994;14:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Siddons AW, Hughes RT. Practical geometry (based on the various geometry books by Godfrey and Siddons). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Parry WT, Hacker EA. Aristotelian logic. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. An expanded source book: qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 1994. p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Toluk-Uçar Z. Inservice and preservice elementary teachers' definitions of square, rectangle, trapezoid, and parallelogram. Paper presented at: The European Conference on Educational Research (ECER); 2012; Cadíz, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards B, Ward M. The role of mathematical definitions in mathematics and in undergraduate mathematics courses. In: Carlson M, Rasmussen C, editors. Making the connection: research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 2008. p. 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson E. Teachers' knowledge of the nature of definitions: the case of the zero exponent. J Math Behav. 2012;31:209–219.
   Google Scholar
• Koç Y, Bozkurt A. Evaluating pre-service mathematics teachers' comprehension level of geometric concepts. In: Ubuz B, editor. The Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 1. Ankara: PME; 2011. p. 335.
   Google Scholar
• Aytekin C, Toluk-Uçar Z. Teachers' definition of square, rectangle, parallelogram and trapezoid. In: Ubuz B, editor. The proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol. 1. Ankara: PME; 2011. p. 254.
   Google Scholar