The mathematics textbook at tertiary level as curriculum material – exploring the teacher's decision-making process

References

• Tarr JE, Reys RE, Reys BJ, et al. The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. J Res Math Educ. 2008;39:247–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Even R. Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two classes taught by the same teacher. In: Remillard JT, Herbel-Eisenmann BA, Lloyd GM, editors. Mathematics teachers at work: connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction–. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 152–170.
   Google Scholar
• Speer N, Smith JP, Horvath A. Collegiate mathematics teaching: an unexamined practice. J Math Behav. 2010;29(2):99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Weber K. Traditional instruction in advance mathematics courses: a case study of one professor's lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. J Math Behav. 2004;23:115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi K. Three styles characterising mathematicians' pedagogical perspectives on proof. Educ Stud Math. 2010;75:271–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist T, Lithner J. Mathematical reasoning in teachers' presentations. J Math Behav. 2012;31:252–269.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten C. Lectures notes – on lecturing in undergraduate mathematics. In: Bergsten C, Grevholm B, editors. Developing and researching quality in mathematics teaching and learning. Proceedings of MADIF 5. Linköping: SMDF; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard D. Where learning starts? A framework for thinking about lectures in university mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2010;41(5):609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Randahl M. First-year engineering students' use of their mathematics textbook – opportunities and constraints. Math Educ Res J. 2012;24(3):239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RA. Calculus. A complete course. Toronto: Pearson; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert J, Grouws DA. The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In: Lester FK, Jr., editor. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2007. p. 371–404.
   Google Scholar
• Love E, Pimm D. ‘This is so’: a text on texts. In: Bishop AJ, Clements K, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Laborde C, editors. International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 371–409). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke NJ, Knapp MS, Sirotnik KA. In search of the school curriculum. Rev Res Educ. 1992;18:51–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard JT. Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Rev Educ Res. 2005;75(2):211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball DL, Cohen DK. Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educ Res. 1996;25(9):6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stein MK, Remillard J, Smith MS. How curriculum influences student learning. In: Lester FK, editor. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing; 2007. p. 319–369.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In: Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kümmerer B. Trying the impossible: teaching mathematics to physicist and engineers. In: Holton D, editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• Petocz P, Reid A. Rethinking the tertiary mathematics curriculum. Cambridge J Educ. 200; 35(1):89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert J, Carpenter TP. Learning and teaching with understanding. In: Grouws DA, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning–. New York: Macmillan; 1992. p. 65–97.
   Google Scholar
• White P, Mitchelmore M. Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus. J Res Math Educ. 1996;27(1):79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. The practice of (university) mathematics teaching: Mediational inquiry in a community of practice or an activity system. Paper presented at: Proceedings of CERME 6; 2009 January 28–February 1; Lyon France; 2009. p. 1585–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Harel G. Variations in linear algebra content presentations. Learn Math. 1987;7(3)29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Raman M. Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: students behaviour and textbooks messages. J Math Behav. 2002;21:135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Vinner S. The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. Concept image and concept definition. Senior Secondary Mathematics Education. Utrecht: OW&OC; 1988. p. 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D. A sensible approach to the calculus. Paper presented at: The National and International Meeting on the Teaching of Calculus. Pueblo, Mexico; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland T. The purpose, design and use of examples in the teaching of elementary mathematics. Educ Stud Math. 2008;69(2):149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Watson A, Mason J. Mathematics as a constructive activity: learners generating examples. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zodik I, Zaslavsky O. Characteristics of teachers' choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math. 2008;69:165–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner J. Students' mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educ Stud Math. 2003;52:29–55.
   Google Scholar
• Weber K, Porter M, Housman D. Worked examples and concept example usage in understanding mathematical concepts and proofs. In: Carlson MP, Rasmussen C, editors. Making the connections. Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 2008. p. 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MS, Stein MK. Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Math Teaching Middle School 1998;3:344–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bell A. Principles for the design of teaching. Educ Stud Math. 1993;24:5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Graybeal SS, Stodolsky SS. Where's all the “good stuff ?”: an analysis of fifth-grade mathematics and social studies teachers' guides. Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; Washington, DC; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson A. The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educ Stud Math. 1984;15:105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G. Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? J Teacher Educ. 2008;59(5):389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard JT, Bryans, MB. Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: implications for teacher learning. J Res Math Educ. 2004;35(5):352–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen M, Stein M. Mathematical tasks and students cognition: classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. J Res Math Educ. 1997;28:524–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman LS. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res. 1986;15(2):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Harel G. On teacher education programs in mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 1993;25(1):113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis R, Fraser S, Leikin R. Advanced mathematical knowledge: how it is used in teaching? In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F, editors. Proceedings of CERME 6; Lyon France; 2009. p. 2365–2375.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Educ. 1999;37:57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M, Taylor P. Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Educ. 1994;27:75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Randahl M, Grevholm B. Learning opportunities offered by a classical calculus textbook to engineering students about differentiation. NOMAD. 2010;15(2):5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tall D, Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educ Stud Math. 1981;4:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KH, Lee EJ, Park MS Task modification and knowledge utilization by Korean prospective mathematics teachers. Gazi J Educ. 2013;1(1):3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo S. Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers' practices. Educ Stud Math. 2003;52(3):243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Amoah V, Laridon P. Using multiple representations to assess students' understanding of the derivative concept. Proc British Soc Res Learn Math. 2004;24(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson M. Teaching mathematics with textbooks. A classroom and curricular perspective [PhD thesis]. Luleå (Sweden): Department of Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Leapfrogs. Network. London: Hutchinson; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Orton A. Students' understanding of differentiation. Educ Stud Math. 1983;14:235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Viholainen A. Prospective mathematics teachers' informal and formal reasoning about the concepts of derivative and differentiability [PhD thesis]. Jyväskylä (Finland): University of Jyväskylä; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Apostol TM. Calculus I: one-variable calculus with an introduction to linear algebra. New York: Wiley; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Selden A, Selden J. Tertiary mathematics education research and its future. In: Holton D, editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level–. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E. The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic, and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. In: Biehler R, Scholtz RW, Strässer R, Winkelmann B, editors. Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. p. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart M, Borko H, Underhill R, et al. Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. J Res Math Educ. 1993;24(1):8–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert J, Lefevre P. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: an introductory analysis. In: Hiebert J, editor. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of mathematics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986. p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Asiala M, Cottrill J, Dubinsky E, et al. The development of students' graphical understanding of the derivative. J Math Behav. 1997;16(4):399–431.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Researching your own practice: the discipline of noticing. Oxon: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi E, Jaworski B, Hegedus S. A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergraduate mathematics: from “tricks” to “techniques.” J Res Math Educ. 2005;36(4):284–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsina C. Why the professor must be a stimulating teacher? In: Holton D, editor. The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI study–. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Davis P, Hersh R. The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhäuser; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Apple MW, editor. Global crises, social justice, and education. New York: Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Borg WR, Gall MD. Educational research: an introduction. New York: Longman; 1989.
   Google Scholar