Comparing the development of the multiplication of fractions in Turkish and American textbooks

References

• Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMSS]. 2015; Database-TIMSS 2015. [Retrieved from December 15, 2016]. http://timss.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/Timss_2015_ulusal_fen_mat_raporu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. 2015; Database-PISA 2015. [Retrieved from December 15, 2016]. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alajmi AH. How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educ Stud Math. 2012;79(2):239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son JW. A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity: The case of fraction addition and subtraction. ZDM Math Educ. 2012;44:161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Son JW, Senk S. How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educ Stud Math. 2010;74(2):117–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulm G, Capraro RM. Textbook use and student learning of number and algebra ideas in middle grades. In: Kulm G, editor. Teacher knowledge and practice in middle grades mathematics. Rotterdam: Sense. 2008. p. 255–272.
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Zhu Y, Miao Z. Textbook research in mathematics education: development status and directions. ZDM Math Educ. 2013;45:633–646. DOI:10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen X, An S. Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: The case of fraction division. ZDM Math Educ. 2009;41(6):809–826.
   Google Scholar
• Son JW, Hu Q. The initial treatment of the concept of function in the selected secondary school mathematics textbooks in the US and China. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2016;47(4):505–530. DOI:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1088084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y. A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. J Res Math Educ. 2000;31(2):234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong DS, Choi KM. A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: the case of quadratic equations. Educ Stud Math. 2014;85:241–263. DOI:10.1007/s10649-013-9512-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Sims V, Tajika H. A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educ Res J. 1995;32(2):443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son JW. A comparison of how textbooks teach multiplication of fractions and division of fractions in Korea and in the U.S. In: Chick HL, Vincent JL, editors. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; Melbourne; 2005 July 10–15. p. 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Cady JA, Collins TE, Hodges RL. A comparison of textbooks' presentation of fractions. School Sci Math. 2015;115(3):105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni YJ. The understanding of the meaning and nature of fraction of grade fifth and sixth. Psychol Dev Educ. 1999;11:26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe G, Gearhart M, Nasir NS. Enhancing students' understanding of mathematics: a study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. J Math Teach Educ. 2001;4:55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler RS, Fazio LK, Bailey DH, et al. Fractions: the new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(1):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DC, Reys RE, Wu LL. Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth- and sixth-graders' textbooks of Singapore, Taiwan, and the USA. School Sci Math. 2010;110(3):118–127. DOI:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00015.x
   Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Yang DC, Becker J, et al. Preservice teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of fraction operations: a comparative study of the United States and Taiwan. School Sci Math. 2013;113(1):41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New York (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Olanoff D, Lo JJ, Tobias JM. Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: a focus on fractions. Math Enthusiast. 2014;11(2):267–310.
   Google Scholar
• Strother S, Brendefur JL, Thiede K, et al. Five key ideas to teach fractions and decimals with understanding. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2016;3(2):132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Ünlü M, Ertekin E. Why do pre-service teachers pose multiplication problems instead of division problems in fractions? Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2012;46:490–494.
   Google Scholar
• Huang TW, Liu ST, Lin CY. Preservice teachers’ mathematical knowledge of fractions. Res High Educ J. 2009;5:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin Z. Studying textbooks in an information age-a United States perspective. ZDM Math Educ. 2013;45:713–723. DOI:10.1007/s11858-013-0514-6
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Zhu Y. Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. Math Educ. 2000;5(1/2):117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa V. Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: an empirical approach. Educ Stud Math. 2004;56:255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Reys BJ, Reys RE, Chavez O. Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educ Leadership. 2004;61(5):61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood S, Jitendra AK. A comparative analysis of number sense instruction in reform-based and traditional mathematics textbooks. J Spec Educ. 2007;41(3):145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B. Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rezat S. The utilization of mathematics textbooks as instruments of learning. In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F, editors. Proceedings of Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education 6; Lyon; 2009. p. 1260–1269.
   Google Scholar
• Erbaş AK, Alacacı C, Bulut M. A comparison of mathematics textbooks from Turkey, Singapore, and the United States of America. Educ Sci: Theory Pract. 2012;12(3):2324–2330.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş MC, Aktaş DY. Investigating explanation of relations between quadrilaterals in the 7 th grade elementary school mathematics curriculum, textbooks and students’ workbooks. E-J New World Sci Acad. 2012;7(2):848–858.
   Google Scholar
• Sağlam R. A comparative analysis of quadratics in mathematics textbooks from Turkey, Singapore, and the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ankara: Bilkent University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kar T, Işık C. Comparison of Turkish and American seventh grade mathematics textbooks in terms of addition and subtraction operations with integers. Educ Sci. 2015;40(177):75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MONE]. Middle school mathematics curriculum: grades 5–8. Ankara; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative [CCSSI]. 2014. [Retrieved from December 19, 2016] http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/4/NF/
   Google Scholar
• Cramer K, Bezuk N. Multiplication of fractions: teaching for understanding. Arith Teach. 1991;39(3):34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Azim DS. Preservice elementary teachers' understanding of multiplication with fractions [dissertation]. Pullman (WA): Washington State University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Borko H, Eisenhart M, Brown CA, et al. Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? J Res Math Educ. 1992;23:194–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon MA, Blume GW. Building and understanding multiplicative relationship: a study of prospective elementary teachers. J Res Math Educ. 1994;25(5):472–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh D. Enhancing prospective teacher’ knowledge of children's conceptions: the case of division of fractions. J Res Math Educ. 2000;31(1):5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher J. Fractions: partitioning and the part-whole concept. Set: Res Inform Teach. 2009;2:12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu M. Student performance in dealing with fractions. J Educ Res. 1997;90(6):375–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr MJ, Lesh R, Post T, et al. Rational number concepts. In: Lesh R, Landau M, editors. Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1983. p. 91–126.
   Google Scholar
• Behr MJ, Harel G, Post T, et al. Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In: Grouws DA, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York (NY): Macmillan; 1992. p. 296–333.
   Google Scholar
• Izsák A. Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition Instruct. 2008;26(1):95–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive J. From fractions to rationale numbers of arithmetic: a reorganization hypothesis. Math Think Learn. 1999;1(4):279–314.
   Google Scholar
• Olive J, Steffe L. The construction of an iterative fractional scheme: the case of Joe. J Math Behav. 2001;20(4):413–437.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe L. On the construction of learning trajectories of children: the case of commensurate fractions. Math Think Learn. 2004;6(2):129–162.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe T. Teaching multiplication: an analysis of elementary school mathematics teachers’ manual from Japan and the United States. Elem School J. 2003;104:111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns M. About teaching mathematics: a K-8 resource. Sausalito: Math Solutions Publication; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E, Deri M, Nello MS, et al. The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. J Res Math Educ. 1985;16(1):3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt S, Weiser W. Semantic structures of one-step word problems involving multiplication or division. Educ Stud Math. 1995;28(1):55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Luo F. Evaluating the effectiveness and insights of pre-service elementary teachers’ abilities to construct word problems for fraction multiplication. J Math Educ. 2009;2(1):83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Azim DS. Preservice elementary teachers' understanding of multiplication involving fractions. In: Owens DT, Reed MK, Millsaps GM, editors. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus (OH); 1995 Oct 21–24. p. 226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Mack NK. Long-term effects of building on informal knowledge in a complex content domain: the case of multiplication of fractions. J Math Behav. 2000;19(3):307–332.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle JA, Karp KS, Bay-Williams JM. Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching develop-mentally. 7th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson Education; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mack NK. Building a foundation for understanding the multiplication of fractions. Teach Children Math. 1998;5(1):34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PW, Saldanha LA. Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In: Kilpatrick J, Martin WG, Schifter D, editors. A research companion to principles and standards in school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2003. p. 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ubuz B, Erbaş AK, Çetinkaya B, et al. Exploring the quality of the mathematical tasks in the new Turkish elementary school mathematics curriculum guidebook: the case of algebra. ZDM Math Educ. 2010;42(5):483–491.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MONE]. Elementary mathematics curriculum: grades 1–4. Ankara; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın T, Gündoğdu L. Ortaokul Matematik 6 Sınıf Ders Kitabı. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Ankara: Koza Yayın Dağıtım; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Doğan M, Karakaya V. Ortaokul Matematik 6 Sınıf Ders Kitabı. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı (Birinci Baskı). Ankara: Devlet Kitapları; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kar T. Analysis of problems posed by sixth-grade middle school students for the addition of fractions in terms of semantic structures. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2015;46(3):1–16. DOI:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1021394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English LD. Problem posing in elementary curriculum. In Lester F, Charles R, editors. Teaching mathematics through problem solving. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Silver EA. On mathematical problem posing. Learn Math. 1994;14(1):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bell M, Bretzlauf J, Burns SR, et al. Everyday Mathematics Sixth Grade Student Math Journal Volume 1 (Common Core State Standards Edition). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation; 2012a.
   Google Scholar
• Bell M, Bretzlauf J, Dillard A, et al. Everyday Mathematics Fifth Grade Student Math Journal Volume 2 (Common Core State Standards Edition). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation; 2012b.
   Google Scholar
• Lappan G, Philips ED, Fey JT, et al. Let's Be Rational: Understanding Fraction Operations. In Michigan State University, editor. Connected Mathematics 3. Boston (MA): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2014a.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA. An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lappan G, Philips ED, Fey JT, et al. Teacher Resources Grade 6. In: Michigan State University, editor. Connected mathematics 3. Boston (MA): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2014b.
   Google Scholar
• Bell M, Bretzlauf J, Dillard A, et al. Everyday Mathematics Fifth Grade Teacher's Lesson Guide Volume 2 (Common Core State Standards Edition). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation; 2012c.
   Google Scholar
• Bell M, Bretzlauf J, Burns SR, et al. Everyday Mathematics Sixth Grade Student Math Journal Volume 2 (Common Core State Standards Edition). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation; 2012e.
   Google Scholar
• Bell M, Bell J, Bretzlauf J, et al. Everyday Mathematics Fifth Grade Student Reference Book (Common Core State Standards Edition). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation; 2012d.
   Google Scholar
• Ding M, Li X. A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition Instruct. 2010;28(2):146–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth S. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn Instruct. 2006;16:183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagatsis A, Shiakalli M. Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educ Psychol. 2004;24:645–657.
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Zhu Y. Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educ Stud Math. 2007;66:61–75. DOI:10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Hwang S. Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. J Math Behav. 2002;21:401–421.
   Google Scholar
• Toluk-Uçar Z. Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing. Teach Teach Educ. 2009;25:166–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. 2012; Database-PISA 2012. [Retrieved from August 24, 2014]. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cai J. Singaporean students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2003;34(5):719–737. DOI:10.1080/00207390310001595401
   Google Scholar
• Silber S, Cai C. Pre-service teachers' free and structured mathematical problem posing. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2017;48(2):163–184. DOI:10.1080/0020739X.2016.1232843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Lo JJ, Watanabe T. Intended Treatments of Arithmetic Average in U.S. and Asian School Mathematics Textbooks. School Sci Math. 2002;102(8):391–404. DOI:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17891.x
   Google Scholar
• Webb NL. An analysis of the alignment between mathematics standards and assessments for three states. Paper presented at: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting; 2002; New Orleans (LA).
   Google Scholar
• Remillard JT. Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. Elem School J. 2000;100(4):331–350. DOI:10.1086/499645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar