Intra-mathematical connections made by high school students in performing Calculus tasks

References

• Evitts T. Investigating the mathematical connections that preservice teachers use and develop while solving problems from reform curricula [dissertation]. Pennsylvania State University College of Education; 2004. Available from: https://search-proquest-com. etechconricyt.idm.oclc.org/docview/305151710?accountid=189277
   Google Scholar
• Jaijan W, Loipha S. Making mathematical connections with transformations using open approach. HRD J. 2012;3(1):91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Mwakapenda W. Understanding connections in the school mathematics curriculum. South African J Educ. 2008;28:189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGB. Cálculo diferencial. 2013a. [ cited 2015 Jun 10]. Available from: http://www.dgb.sep.gob.mx/informacion-academica/programas-de-estudio/cfp_5sem/calculo-diferencial.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DGB. Cálculo Integral. 2013b. [ cited 2015 Jun 10]. Available from: http://www.dgb.sep.gob.mx/informacion-academica/programas-de-estudio/cfp_6sem/CALCULO_INTEGRAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eli J, Mohr-Schroeder M, Lee C. Exploring mathematical connections of prospective middle-grades teachers through card-sorting tasks. Math Edc Res J. 2011;23(3):297–319.
   Google Scholar
• Mhlolo M. Mathematical connections of a higher cognitive level: a tool we may use to identify these in practice. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2012;16(2):176–191.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Marshman M. Using concept maps to show ‘connections’ in measurement: an example from the Australian curriculum. Australian Math Teach. 2014;70(4):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer A. Making connections: promoting connectedness in early mathematics education. Paper presented at: the 31st Annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia; 2008; Brisbane, Australia. Available from: https://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP512008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berry J, Nyman M. Promoting students’ graphical understanding of the calculus. J Math Behav. 2003;22(4):479–495.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins P, Mendoza J. The development and nature of problem-solving among first-semester calculus students. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45(6):839–862.
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu E, Aspinwall L, Presmeg N. Contrasting cases of calculus students' understanding of derivative graphs. Math Thinking Learn. 2010;12(2):152–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Thomas M. Graphical construction of a local perspective on differentiation and integration. Math Edc Res J. 2015;27(2):183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon K, Brenner M, Jacob B, et al. Prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ understanding and cognitive difficulties in making connections among representations. Math Thinking Learn. 2013;15(3):201–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eli J, Mohr‐Schroeder M, Lee C. Mathematical connections and their relationship to mathematics knowledge for teaching geometry. Sch Sci Math. 2013;113(3):120–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mamolo A, Zazkis R. Stuck on convention: a story of derivative relationships. Educ Stud Math. 2012;81(2):161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mhlolo M, Venkat H, Schäfer M. The nature and quality of the mathematical connections teachers make. Pythagoras. 2012;33(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood E. Student connections among counting problems: an exploration using actor-oriented transfer. Educ Stud Math. 2011;78:307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgen K. Problem çözme bağlaminda matematiksel ilişkilendirme becerisi: öğretmen adaylari örneği [Mathematical connection skill in the context of problem solving: the case of pre-service teachers]. NWSA-Educ Sci. 2013;8(3):323–345. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon C, Dreyfus T, Thomas M. How high is the tramping track? Mathematising and applying in a calculus model-eliciting activity. Math Edc Res J. 2010;22(2):141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J. Calculus: concepts and contexts. CENGAGE Learning; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert J, Carpenter TP. Learning and teaching with understanding. In: Grouws DA, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York (NY): McMillan; 1992. p. 65–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kastberg SE. Understanding mathematical concepts: the case of the logarithmic function [thesis]. Athens: University of Georgia; 2002. Available from: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Pers/Dissertations/kastberg_signe_e_200205_phd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Ding M. On mathematical understanding: perspectives of experienced Chinese mathematics teachers. J Math Teach Educ. 2015;18(5):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Businskas A. Conversations about connections: how secondary mathematics teachers conceptualize and contend with mathematical connections [dissertation]. British Columbia: Faculty of Education-Simon Fraser University; 2008. Available from: http://summit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/9245/etd4202_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Begg A. Ethnomathematics: why, and what else? ZDM. 2001;33(3):71–74.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. Principles to action: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Presmeg N. Semiotics and the “connections” standard: significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educ Stud Math. 2006;61:163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin GA. A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In: Kelly AE, Lesh RA, editors. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. p. 517–545.
   Google Scholar
• Assad DA. Task-based interviews in mathematics: understanding student strategies and representations through problem solving. Int J Educ Social Sci. 2015;2(1):17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, editor. Handbook of research methods in psychology. Vol. 2. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2012. p. 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Green TF. The activities of teaching. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu E, Aspinwall L, Presmeg N. The role of reversibility in the learning of the calculus derivative and antiderivative graphs. In: Swars SL, Stinson DW, Lemons-Smith S, editors. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 5; Sep 23–26. Atlanta (GA): Georgia State University; 2009. p. 81–88. Available from: http://www.pmena.org/pmenaproceedings/PMENA%2031%202009%20Proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick J, Hoyles C, Skovsmose O, et al. Meanings of meaning of mathematics. In: Kilpatrick J, Hoyles C, Skovsmose O, Valero P, editors. Meaning in mathematics education. New York, NY: Springer; 2005. p. 9–16. Available from: http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387240398
   Google Scholar