The impact of procedural and conceptual teaching on students' mathematical performance over time

References

• Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Roa, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. (1991). Analysis. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 167–198). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo, E., Azcárate, C., & Font, V. (2011). Analysis of mathematics teachers’ level of understanding of the objects f′(a) and f′(x). Enseñanza de las ciencias, 29(2), 191–206. doi: 10.5565/rev/ec/v29n2.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B., Cooley, L., & Trigueros, M. (2000). A calculus graphing schema. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 557–578. doi: 10.2307/749887
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögeholz, S., Böhm, M., Eggert, S., & Barkmann, J. (2014). Education for sustainable development in German science education: Past – Present – Future. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(4), 231–248. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1079a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borji, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2018). Application of the APOS-ACE theory to improve students’ graphical understanding of derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2947–2967. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/91451
   Google Scholar
• Borji, V., Font, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Sánchez, A. (2018). Application of the Complementarities of two theories, APOS and OSA, for the analysis of the university students’ understanding on the graph of the function and its derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2301–2315. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/89514
   Google Scholar
• Borji, V., Font, V., Alamolhodaei, H., Sánchez, A., & Pino-Fan, L. (2018). On students’ understanding of implicit differentiation, based on two lenses: APOS and OSA. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.). Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ( Vol. 5, p. 25). Umeå, Sweden: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Borji, V., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2019). What does 'y is defined as an implicit function of x' mean?: An application of APOS-ACE. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100739. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S. B., & Karp, K. S. (2013). Prerequisite algebra skills and associated misconceptions of middle grade students: A review. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 613–632. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Canning, M. (2017). How do New Zealand Teachers like to be supported by psychologists? (Master's thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Canobi, K. H. (2009). Concept-procedure interactions in children's addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 131–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, K. K., & Killpatrick, K. (2003). Effects of concept-based instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge of calculus. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 13(1), 17–37. doi: 10.1080/10511970308984043
   Google Scholar
• Cilli-Turner, E. (2017). Impacts of inquiry pedagogy on undergraduate students conceptions of the function of proof. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., Cordero, F., Cottrill, J., Czarnocha, B., DeVries, D. J., St. John, D., … Vidakovic, D. (1997). Constructing a schema: The case of the chain rule? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 345–364. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90012-2
   Google Scholar
• Cottrill, J. F. (1999). Students’ understanding of the concept of chain rule in first year calculus and the relation to their understanding of composition of functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. M. (2015). Teaching fractions procedurally and conceptually to pre-service elementary education teachers (Doctoral dissertation in practice). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5004. Retrieved from http://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5004
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Potgieter, M. (2005). Undergraduate students’ performance and confidence in procedural and conceptual mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 701–712. doi: 10.1080/00207390500271107
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, R. & Williams, E. M. (1998). Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain specificity and epigenesis. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 575–630). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, H., & Bateman, E. (2010). Authority in an agency-centered, inquiry-based university calculus classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(4), 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. L., Berman, J., & Bellert, A. (2015). Sustainable learning: Inclusive practices for 21st century classrooms. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasalo, L., & Kadijevich, D. (2000). Two types of mathematical knowledge and their relation. JMD-Journal for Mathematic-Didaktik, 21, 139–157. doi: 10.1007/BF03338914
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Hallet, D., Gleason, A. M., & Mccallum, W. G. (2017). Calculus: Single and multivariable (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Joffrion, K. H. (2005). Conceptual and procedural understanding of algebra concepts in the middle grades (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4271888.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. R. (2013). Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 122–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Khoule, A., Bonsu, N., & El Houari, H. (2017). Impact of conceptual and procedural knowledge on students mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(1), 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kiat, S. E. (2005). Analysis of students’ difficulties in solving integration problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Krainer, K., Zehetmeier, S., Hanfstingl, B., Rauch, F., & Tscheinig, T. (2018). Insights into scaling up a nationwide learning and teaching initiative on various levels. Educational Studies in Mathematics. doi: 10.1007/s10649-018-9826-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2019). Justifications for choices made in procedures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(3), 325–340. doi: 10.1007/s10649-019-09886-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 201–211. doi: 10.1080/00207390802213591
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Planell, R., Trigueros, M., & McGee, D. (2015). On students’ understanding of the differential calculus of functions of two variables. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 57–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus, E. (2016). Análisis Didáctico a un Proceso de Instrucción del Método de Integración por Partes [Teaching analysis to process integration method instruction by parties]. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 30(55), 559–585. doi: 10.1590/1980-4415v30n55a13
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (2012). 11th ed. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2014). Procedural fluency in mathematics: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/PositionStatements/Procedural-Fluency-in-Mathematics/
   Google Scholar
• Oaks, A. B. (1990). Writing to learn mathematics: Why do we need it and how can it help us?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teachers of New York State, Ellenville, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00704699
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2015). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do we teach it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10649-015-9601-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesek, D. D., & Kirschner, D. (2000). Interference of instrumental instruction in subsequent relational learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 524–540. doi: 10.2307/749885
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & García, R. (1983). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pino-Fan, L., Font, V., Gordillo, W., Larios, V., & Breda, A. (2018). Analysis of the meanings of the antiderivative used by students of the first engineering courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1091–1113. doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9826-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr, F. (2016). Exploring students’ learning of integral calculus using revised Bloom's taxonomy (Doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2017). Exploring students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and skills in relation to fundamental theorem of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 1043–1071. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2017.1305129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Students' mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships. Teaching Mathematics and Its Application: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(2), 85–106. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hry006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., & Omanson, S. F. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology ( Vol. 3, pp. 41–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118–1134). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 587–597. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2015). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of the derivative concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1305–1329. doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9544-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selter, C., Prediger, S., Nührenbörger, M., & Hußmann, S. (2012). Taking away and determining the difference—A longitudinal perspective on two models of subtraction and the inverse relation to addition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(3), 389–408. doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00302715
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377–397. doi:10.1037/0096–3445.127.4.377 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Southall, E. (2016). The formula triangle and other problems with procedural teaching in mathematics. School Science Review (SSR), 97(360), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2010). Calculus. Mason, OH: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., Hass, J., & Giordano, R. F. (2010). Thomas’ calculus: Early transcendentals. Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2), 229–274. doi: 10.1007/BF01273664
   Google Scholar
• Varsavsky, C. (2012). Use of CAS in secondary school: A factor influencing the transition to university-level mathematics? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(1), 33–42. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2011.582179
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., Rasmussena, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 275–287. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00051-1
   Google Scholar
• Yopp, D. (2014). Undergraduates’ use of examples in online discussions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Zandieh, M. (2000). A theoretical framework for analyzing students understanding of the concept of derivative. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education ( Vol. IV, pp. 103–127). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar