Can dynamic activities boost mathematics understanding and metacognition? A case study on the limit of rational functions

References

• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember. A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 77–165). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from text by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. H., Leung, S. W., Mui, W. K., & Kwok, P. M. (2012). New trend senior secondary mathematics—module 2: Algebra and calculus, volume 1. Chung Tai Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist Views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 107–122). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Cueto, S., León, J., Sorto, M. A., & Miranda, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics achievement of students in Peru. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9735-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2017). Mathematics education key learning area: Mathematics curriculum guide (P1–P6). Curriculum Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2002). Off-line metacognition – A domain-specific retardation in young children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem-solving in Grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favieri, A. G. (2013). General metacognitive strategies inventory (GMSI) and the metacognitive integrals strategies inventory (MISI). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(3), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/t33635-000.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem-solving. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054003363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, C. H., & Leung, C. K. (2018). Pilot study on the validity and reliability of MIM: An alternative assessment for measuring metacognition in mathematics among college student. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 7(4), 11--22.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
   Google Scholar
• Guven, B., Baki, A., & Cekmez, E. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software to develop problem-solving skills. Mathematics and Computer Education, 46(1), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N., & Güzel, E. B. (2015). Metacognitive structures occurring in mathematical within a technology enhanced environment. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 6(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.00708
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, M. (2002). Geogebra—Ein Softwaresystem für dynamische Geometrie und Algebra der Ebene. [Diplomarbeit, Universität Salzburg]. http://www.geogebra.org/publications/diplomarbeit_geogebra.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hölzl, R. (2001). Using dynamic geometry software to add contrast to geometric situations – A case study. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011464425023
   Google Scholar
• Isiksal, M., & Askar, P. (2005). The effect of spreadsheet and dynamic geometry software on the achievement and self-efficacy of 7th-grade students. Educational Research, 47(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500287815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzle, A. (2017). Delving into the nature of problem-solving processes in a dynamic geometry environment: Different technological effects on cognitive processing. Technology Knowledge & Learning, 22(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9284-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslehpour, M. (1995). Metacognition and problem-solving of college students in technology, engineering, mathematics and humanities [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri. http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw.ezproxy.eduhk.hk/doc/9705643
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2005). Technology-supported mathematics learning environments.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 7–18). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Polášek, V., & Sedláček, L. (2015). Dynamic geometry environments as cognitive tool in mathematics education. Journal of Technology and Information Education, 7(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5507/jtie.2015.017
   Google Scholar
• Poon, K. K., & Wong, K. L. (2017). Pre-constructed dynamic geometry materials in the classroom – How do they facilitate the learning of ‘Similar Triangles’? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(5), 735--755.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345900010106
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem-solving. In R. Lesh, & M. Laudau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–395). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985a). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem-solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 361–379). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985b). Mathematical problem-solving. Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, L. M. (1995). Teachers’ perceptions of the concept of limit, the role of limits, and the teaching of limits in advanced placement calculus [Doctoral dissertation]. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.eduhk.hk/docview/304228121?accountid=11441
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem-solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L. (1999). Realistic mathematical modelling and problem-solving in the upper elementary school: Analysis and improvement. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. Van Luit, & B. Csapo (Eds.), Teaching and learning thinking skills: Contexts of learning (pp. 215–240). Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem-solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 57–78). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y., & Tatar, E. (2017). Integrating dynamic mathematics software into cooperative learning environments in mathematics. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar