Fun with flags – a problem set for dynamic geometry environments

References

• Arzarello F., Olivero F., Paola D., & Robutti O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. Zentralblatt für Mathematikdidaktik, 34(3), 66–S.72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655708
   Google Scholar
• Boero P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof , 4. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html
   Google Scholar
• Brunner E. (2013). Innermathematisches Beweisen und Argumentieren in der Sekundarstufe I: Mögliche Erklärungen für systematische Bearbeitungsunterschiede und leistungsförderliche Aspekte [Mathematical arguing, reasoning and proving: Possible explanations for systematic processing differences and performance-enhancing aspects]. Waxmann
   Google Scholar
• Brunner E. (2014). Mathematisches Argumentieren, Begründen und Beweisen: Grundlagen, Befunde und Konzepte [Mathematical arguing, reasoning and proving: Basics, findings and concepts]. Springer
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal VS 2047. (1991). Himalayan Research Bulletin, 11(1), 19–68. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1272&context=himalaya
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer R., & Malle G. (2004). Mensch und Mathematik – Eine Einführung in didaktisches Denken und Handeln [Man and mathematics – An introduction to didactical thinking and acting]. BI-Wiss.-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harel G., & Sowder L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results form exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (pp. 234–283). American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Healy L., & Hoyles C. (1998). Justifying and proving in school mathematics. Technical report on the nationwide survey. Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert T., Renkl A., Kessler S., & Reiss K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humenberger H. (2018). Flächenausgleich bei Weiß und Grau – Regelmäßige Vielecke und ver- zerrte Schachbretter [Area equilibria with white and black – regular polygons and distorted chessboards]. Der Mathematikunterricht, 64(4), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kanellos I., Nardi E., & Biza I. (2018). Proof schemes combined: Mapping secondary students' multi-faceted and evolving first encounters with mathematical proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(4), 277–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1509420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieme E., Reiss K., & Heinze A. (2003). Geometrical competence and understanding of proof. A study based on TIMSS items. In F. L. Lin & J. Guo (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Mathematics Learning 2003 (pp. 60–80). National Taiwan Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Olivero F. (2002). The proving process within a dynamic geometry environment [Dissertation, University of Bristol]. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190412/document
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K., Heinze A., & Klieme E. (2002). Argumentation, proof and the understanding of proof. In H.-G. Weigand, N. Neill, A. Peter-Koop, K. Reiss, G. Törner, & B. Wollring (Eds.), Developments in mathematics education in Germany. Selected papers from the annual conference on didactics of mathematics, Potsdam 2000 (pp. 109–120). Franzbecker.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K., Heinze A, Renkl A., & Groß C. (2008). Reasoning and proof in geometry: Effects of a learning environment based on heuristic worked-out examples. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0105-0
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K., Hellmich F., & Reiss M. (2002). Reasoning and proof in geometry: Prerequisites of knowledge acquisition in secondary school students. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 113–120). University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K., Klieme E., & Heinze A. (2001). Prerequisites for the understanding of proofs in the geometry classroom. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 97–104). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ufer S., & Heinze A. (2008). Development of geometrical proof competency from grade 7 to 9: A longitudinal study [Paper presentation]. 11th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Monterrey, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent J. L. (2002). Mechanical linkages, dynamic geometry software, and argumentation: Supporting a classroom culture of mathematical proof [Dissertation, University of Melbourne]. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/38998
   Google Scholar
• Wares A. (2019). An unexpected property of quadrilaterals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 315–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1472820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter H. (1983). Zur Problematik des Beweisbedürfnisses [On the issue of the need for proof]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 4(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339229
   Google Scholar
• Yackel E., & Cobb P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar