1,410
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Clash of cultures? Exploring students’ perceptions of differences between secondary and tertiary mathematics education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1567-1596 | Received 01 Jul 2021, Published online: 12 May 2022

References

  • Anastasakis, M., Zakynthinaki, M., Trujillo-González, R., García-Alonso, I., & Petridis, K. (2020). An activity theory approach in explaining engineering students’ difficulties with university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1834156
  • Anthony, G. (2000). Factors influencing first-year students’ success in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073900287336
  • Artigue, M., & Winsløw, C. (2010). International comparative studies on mathematics education: A viewpoint from the Anthropological theory of didactics. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 31(1), 47–82. https://revue-rdm.com/2010/international-comparative-studies/
  • Ashby, J., Sadera, W., & McNary, S. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128–140. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/10.3.2.pdf
  • Bengmark, S., Thunberg, H., & Winberg, T. M. (2017). Success-factors in transition to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1310311
  • Bergsten, C., Jablonka, E., & Ashjari, H. (2015). Övergången från skolans till högskolans matematik: En integrerad studie av en kulturkrock [The transition from school mathematics to university mathematics: An integrated study of a cultural gap]. In Swedish Research Council (Eds.), Resultatdialog 2015 [Results dialog 2015], p. 29-41. https://www.vr.se/download/18.2412c5311624176023d25b8f/1555424854896/Resultatdialog_VR_2015.pdf.
  • Brandell, G., Hemmi, K., & Thunberg, H. (2008). The widening gap: A Swedish perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217476
  • Chemers, M. M., Hu, L.-t., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55
  • Clark, M., & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestion for a theoretical model for secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217475
  • Code, W., Merchant, S., Maciejewski, W., Thomas, M., & Lo, J. (2016). The mathematics attitudes and perceptions survey: An instrument to assess expert-like views and dispositions among undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(6), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1133854
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  • DeCoster, J. (2005). Scale construction notes. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html.
  • de Guzmán, M., Hodgson, B., Robert, A., & Villani, V. (1998). Difficulties in the passage from secondary to tertiary education. Documenta Mathematica, Extra Vol. ICMI, III, 747–762.
  • de Winter, J. C. F. (2013). Using the student's t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7275/e4r6-dj05.
  • Edgell, S. E., & Noon, S. M. (1984). Effect of violation of normality on the t test of the correlation coefficient. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.576
  • Engelbrecht, J. C. (1997). Academic support in mathematics in a third world environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2), 323–333.
  • Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2009). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the internet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-6457-2
  • Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & Loch, B. (2012). Tablet technology to facilitate improved interaction and communication with students studying mathematics at a distance. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(4), 363–385.
  • Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary–tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9100-6
  • Gueudet, G., Bosch, M., diSessa, A. A., Kwon, O. N., & Verschaffel, L. (2016). Transitions in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31622-2.
  • Greefrath, G., Koepf, W., & Neugebauer, C. (2017). Is there a link between preparatory course attendance and academic success? A case study of degree programmes in electrical engineering and computer science. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0047-9
  • Jablonka, E., Ashjari, H., & Bergsten, C. (2017). “Much palaver about greater than zero and such stuff”: first year engineering students’ recognition of university mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 69–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0037-y
  • Jones, J., & Long, V. M. (2013). Learning equity between online and on-site mathematics courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1–12. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/jones_0313.pdf
  • Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2005). Transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics: McCaster university experience. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2–3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207340412317040
  • Kizito, R., Munyakazi, J., & Basuayi, C. (2016). Factors affecting student success in a first-year mathematics course: A South African experience. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1057247
  • Lagerlöf, J. N. M., & Seltzer, A. J. (2009). The effects of remedial mathematics on the learning of economics: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Journal of Economic Education, 40(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.40.2.115-137
  • Laging, A., & Voßkamp, R. (2017). Determinants of maths performance of first-year business administration and economics students. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0048-8
  • Lee, J. (2014). An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1638
  • Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(6), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655854
  • Leviatan, T. (2008). Bridging a cultural gap. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217480
  • Liston, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Factors influencing the transition to university service mathematics: Part 1 a quantitative study. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 28(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrp006
  • Loch, B., Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & McDonald, C. (2011). Learner-centred mathematics and statistics education using netbook tablet PCs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.611910
  • Maciejewski, W., & Merchant, S. (2016). Mathematical tasks, study approaches, and course grades in undergraduate mathematics: A year-by-year analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072881
  • Maciejewski, W., Tortora, C., & Bragelman, J. (2021). Beyond skill: students' dispositions towards math. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(2), 18–25.
  • Nardi, E. (1996). The novice mathematician's encounter with mathematical abstraction: tensions in concept-image construction and formalisation. Doctoral thesis, Linacre College, Trinity Term. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:19d55975-7af9-4ed4-ab98-3be18da31e16.
  • OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.
  • OECD/UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264102873-en.
  • Pampaka, M., Williams, J., & Hutcheson, G. (2012). Measuring students’ transition into university and its association with learning outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1041–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.613453
  • Rach, S., & Heinze, A. (2017). The transition from school to university in mathematics: Which influence do school-related variables have? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9744-8
  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
  • Reju, C. O., & Jita, L. (2018). Instructional delivery and students’ experiences with distance and online learning of undergraduate mathematics in Nigeria. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3196
  • Sierpinska, A., Bobos, G., & Knipping, C. (2008). Sources of students’ frustration in pre-university level, prerequisite mathematics courses. Instructional Science, 36(4), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9033-6
  • Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1987). Introduction to biostatistics (2nd ed). Freeman.
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Mathematics for upper secondary school. https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.4fc05a3f164131a74181063/1535372298267/Mathematics-swedish-school.pdf.
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2012). The school–tertiary interface in mathematics: Teaching style and assessment practice. Mathematical Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0051-6
  • Thompson, V. L., & McDowell, Y. L. (2019). A case study comparing student experiences and success in an undergraduate course offered through online, blended, and face-to-face instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.552411
  • Tossavainen, T., Rensaa, R. J., & Johansson, M. (2019). Swedish first-year engineering students’ views of mathematics, self-efficacy and motivation and their effect on task performance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656827
  • Vilardi, R., & Rice, M. L. (2014). Mathematics achievement: Traditional instruction and technology-assisted course delivery methods. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 16–28. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/13.1.2.pdf
  • Wingate, U. (2007). A framework for transition: Supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(3), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00361.x