Different intuitive rules in mathematical thinking

References

• Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077
   Google Scholar
• Babai, R. (2010). Piagetian cognitive level and the tendency to use intuitive rules when solving comparison tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9170-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babai, R., Nattiv, L., & Stavy, R. (2016). Comparison of perimeters: Improving students’ performance by increasing the salience of the relevant variable. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48(3), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0766-z
   Google Scholar
• Barahmand, A. (2019). Exploring main obstacles of inflexibility in mathematics teachers’ behaviour in accepting new ideas: The case of equivalence between infinite sets. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1489074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions: The case of arithmetic, the year in cognitive neuroscience, Annals, New York, Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 232–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duval, R. (1983). L’Obstacle du dedoublement des objets mathematiques. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(4), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368236
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and Proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1/3), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003488222875
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (2001). Tacit models and infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(2), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016088708705
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D., & Hess, P. (1979). The intuition of infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311173
   Google Scholar
• Kattou, M., Michael, T., Kontoyianni, K., Christou, C., & Philippou, G. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions about infinity: A process or an object? In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury- Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME6 (pp. 1771–1780). ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Poincare, H. (1969). Classics in mathematics education: Intuition and logic in mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 62(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.62.3.0205
   Google Scholar
• Rolka, K., Rösken, B., & Liljedahl, P. (2007). The role of cognitive conflict in belief change. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 121–128). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (1996). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: The case of ‘more of A -- more of B’. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D. (1991). The role of students' intuitions of infinity in teaching the Cantorian theory. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 199–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Stavy, R. (1999a). Intuitive rules: A way to explain and predict students’ reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1/3), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003436313032
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Stavy, R. (1999b). Intuitive rules and comparison tasks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_1
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Cohen, S. (1998). Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1257–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (1996). The role of representations in students’ intuitive thinking about infinity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 27(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739960270105
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P. (2001). When ‘the same’ is not perceived as such: The case of infinite sets. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016034917992
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2002). Comparing infinite sets – a process of abstraction the case of Ben. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00100-1
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Ronen, I. (2001). Intuitive rules: A theory and its implications to mathematics and science teacher education. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, M. Komorek, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education – past, present, and future (pp. 167–175). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
   Google Scholar