Formulating a conjecture through an identification of robust invariants with a dynamic geometry system

References

• Abadi, & Chairani, Z. (2020). Indonesia: The development of mathematics teacher education in Indonesia. In B. R. Vogeli & M. E. A. el Tom (Eds.), Mathematics and its teaching in the Muslim world (pp. 75–95). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, L., Mali, A., & Goedhart, M. J. (2021). The effect of proof format on reading comprehension of geometry proof: The case of Indonesian prospective mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782
   Google Scholar
• Arzarello, F., Bussi, M. G. B., Leung, A. Y. L., Mariotti, M. A., & Stevenson, I. (2011). Experimental approaches to theoretical thinking: Artefacts and proofs. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), New ICMI study series (Vol. 15, pp. 97–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_5
   Google Scholar
• Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2012). Dragging and making sense of invariants in dynamic geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(8), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.105.8.0616
   Google Scholar
• Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2010). Generating conjectures in dynamic geometry: The maintaining dragging model. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(3), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9169-3
   Google Scholar
• Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2011). Conjecture-generation through dragging and abduction in dynamic geometry. In A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: Communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (pp. 100–107). Formatex.
   Google Scholar
• Boero, P., Garuti, R., & Lemut, E. (2007). Approaching theorems in grade VIII. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 249–264). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901691_015
   Google Scholar
• Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: A hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems. In L. P. y. A. Gutiérrez (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th PME Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, Universitat de València (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Botana, F., Hohenwarter, M., Janičić, P., Kovács, Z., Petrović, I., Recio, T., & Weitzhofer, S. (2015). Automated theorem proving in GeoGebra: Current achievements. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 55(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-015-9326-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., Pitta-pantazi, D., Gap, T., & Proof, B. (2004). Proofs through exploration in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6785-1
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, M., & Heidemen, N. (2014). Conjecturing, refuting and proving within the context of dynamic geometry. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 17, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Examining the role of logic in teaching proof. In V. M. G. de Hanna (Ed.), Proof and proving in mathematics education: New ICMI study series (Vol. 15, pp. 369–389). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_16
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-León, A., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., & Toscano, R. (2020). A case study of the practices of conjecturing and proving of research mathematicians. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1717658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (1997). Chapter 4: Observing mathematical problem solving through task-based interviews. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 9, 40–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/749946
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0073-4
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L. (2000). Identifying and explaining geometrical relationship: Interactions with robust and soft Cabri constructions. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 103–117). PME. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452031.pdf#page=138
   Google Scholar
• Lannin, J., Ellis, A. B., & Elliott, R. (2011). Developing essential understanding of mathematical reasoning for teaching mathematics in prekindergarten-grade 8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9492-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F. L., Yang, K. L., Lee, K. H., Tabach, M., & Stylianides, G. J. (2012). Principles of task design for conjecturing and proving. In G. Hanna & M. D. Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education: The 19th ICMI study (Vol. 15, pp. 305–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_13
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, A. G., & Lockwood, E. (2019). A comparison between mathematicians’ and students’ use of examples for conjecturing and proving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 579–629). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (2012). Proof and proving in the classroom: Dynamic geometry systems as tools of semiotic mediation. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694282
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (2014). Transforming images in a DGS: The semiotic potential of the dragging tool for introducing the notion of conditional statement. In S. Rezat, M. Hattermann, & A. Peter-Koop (Eds.), Transformation – a fundamental idea of mathematics education (pp. 155–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3489-4_8
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A., & Pedemonte, B. (2019). Intuition and proof in the solution of conjecturing problems. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 51(5), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01059-3
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (2007). Measuring in dynamic geometry environments as a tool for conjecturing and proving. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-007-9115-1
   Google Scholar
• Pawlaschyk, T., & Wegner, S. A. (2020). Engaging students in conjecturing through homework in real analysis and differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Proof in the school mathematics curriculum: A historical perspective. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903253954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. J. (2006). How to prove it: A structured approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808234
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. L., & Lin, F. L. (2008). A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9080-6
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. L., & Lin, F. L. (2012). Effects of reading-oriented tasks on students’ reading comprehension of geometry proof. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0039-2
   Google Scholar