REFERENCES
- Banich M. T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task?. Cortex 1990; 26: 77–94
- Banich M. T., Shenker J. I. Investigation of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. Neuropsychology 1994; 8: 263–277
- Belger A., Banich M. T. Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 923–929
- Compton R. J., Mintzer D. A. Effects of worry and evaluation stress on interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychology 2001; 15: 427–433
- Coney J. Dual hemispheric processing in a letter matching task. Perception & Psychophysics 1985; 38: 331–342
- Davis R., Schmit V. Visual and verbal coding in the interhemispheric transfer of information. Acta Psychologica 1973; 37: 229–240
- Dimond D. J., Beaumont G. Processing in perceptual integration between and within the cerebral hemispheres. British Journal of Psychology 1972; 63: 509–514
- Hatta T., Kawakami A., Kogure T., Ito Y. Effects of type of cognitive demand on bilateral advantage in interhemispheric processing. Psychological Research 2002; 66: 133–142
- Hatta T., Nakatsuka Z. H.N. Handedness inventory. Papers for celebration of the 63rd birthday of Prof. Ohnishi, S. Ohno. Osaka City University Press. 1975; pp. 224–247
- Kassubek J., Schmidtke K., Kimmig H., Luecking C. H., Greenlee M. W. Changes in cortical activation during mirror reading before and after training: An fMRI study of procedural learning. Cognitive Brain Research 2001; 10: 207–217
- Koivisto M. Interhemispheric interaction in semantic categorization of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research 2000; 9: 45–51
- Liederman J., Merola J., Martinez S. Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia 1985; 23: 673–683
- Mohr B., Pulvermueller F., Mittlestaedt K., Rayman J. Multiple simultaneous stimulus presentation facilitates lexical processing. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 1003–1013
- Mohr B., Pulvermueller F., Zaidel E. Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 105–124
- Norman W. D., Jeeves M. A., Milne M., Ludwig T. Hemispheric interactions: The bilateral advantage and task difficulty. Cortex 1992; 28: 623–642
- Pulvermueller F., Mohr B. The concept of transcortical cell assemblies: A key to the understanding of cortical lateralization and interhemispheric interaction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 1996; 20: 557–566
- Tracy J. I., Faro S. S., Mohammed F., Pinus A., Christensen H., Burkland D. A comparison of “early” and “late” stage brain activation during brief practice of a simple motor task. Cognitive Brain Research 2001; 10: 303–316
- van Turennout M., Bielamowicz L., Martin A. Modulation of neural activity during object naming: Effects of time and practice. Cerebral Cortex 2003; 13: 381–391
- Weissman D. H., Banich M. T. Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999; 128: 283–308
- Yoshizaki K. Stages of functional processing and the bihemispheric recognition of Japanese Kana script. Laterality 2000; 5: 155–166
- Yoshizaki K. Effects of visual familiarity for words on interhemispheric cooperation for lexical processing. Cognitive Brain Research 2001; 12: 409–414
- Yoshizaki K., Tsuji Y. Benefits of interhemispheric integration on the Japanese Kana script-matching tasks. Perceptual & Motor Skills 2000; 90: 153–165
- Zhang W., Feng L. Interhemispheric interaction affected by identification of Chinese characters. Brain and Cognition 1999; 39: 93–99