The Effect of Response-Delay on Estimating Reachability

REFERENCES

• Bradshaw M. F., Watt S. J. A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: The effect of temporal delay. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 1766–1778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M. F., Watt S. J., Elliot K. M., Riddell P. M. The effects of pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood. Human Movement Science 2004; 23: 771–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carello C., Grosofsky A., Reichel F. D., Soloan H. Y., Turvey M. T. Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology 1989; 1: 27–54
   Google Scholar
• Coren S. The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and eardness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1993; 31: 1–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott D., Madalena J. The influence of pre-movement visual information on manual aiming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1987; 39A: 541–559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Ammar D., Rodrigues L. Handedness effects on mentally stimulated reaching. Human Movement Science 2005a; 24(4)484–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Ammar D., Rodrigues L. Perceived reach in hemispace. Brain and Cognition 2005b; 58(2)172–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Kroliczak G., Westwood D. A. Dual routes to action: Contributions of the dorsal and ventral streams to adaptive behavior. Progress in Brain Research 2005; 149: 269–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Westwood D. A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004; 14: 203–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Westwood D. A., Milner A. D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research 2004; 144: 131–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham J., Bradshaw M. F., Davis A. The effect of pre-movement delays on pointing accuracy in middle childhood. Perception 1998; 27: 1379–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath M., Westwood D. A. Does a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evidence from a variable spatial mapping paradigm. Motor Control 2003; 7: 346–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath M., Westwood D. A., Binsted G. The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Motor Control 2004; 8: 76–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft H. A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Performance 1993; 23(1)199–212
   Google Scholar
• Holmes M. C., Sholl J. Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005; 31: 1069–1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y., Eagleson R., Goodale M. A. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 1999; 126: 109–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y., Goodale M. A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 2(5)856–868
   Google Scholar
• Johnson S., Corballis P., Gazzaniga M. Within grasp but out reach: Evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 36–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn S. M., Thompson W. L., Wraga, Alpert N. M. Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms. NeuroReport 2001; 8: 2519–2525
   Google Scholar
• Krigolson O., Heath M. Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Human Movement Science 2004; 23(6)861–77
   Google Scholar
• Mark L. S., Nemeth K., Gardner D., Dainoff M. J., Paasche J., Duffy M., et al. Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23: 136–51379
   Google Scholar
• Milner A., Goodale M. A. Plans for action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 2004; 27: 37–40
   Google Scholar
• Robinovitch S. N. Perception of postural limits during reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior 1998; 30(4)352–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat P., Wraga M. An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23(1)199–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirigu A., Duhamel J. R. Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001; 13(7)910–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solodkin A., Hlustik P., Chen E. E., Small S. L. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex 2004; 14: 1246–1255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J. A. Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 2005; 95(3)329–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear C. M., Byblow W. D., Steyvers M., Levin O., Swinnem S. P. Kinesthetic, but not visual imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Experimental Brain Research 2006; 168: 157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood D. A., Heath M., Roy E. A. No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: Systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003; 35: 127–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar