Frequency-specific equivalence of brain activity on motor imagery during action observation and action execution

References

• Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage. 2001;14(1):S103–S109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(4):264–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2014;369(1644):20130185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Guillot A, Di Rienzo F, et al. Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(8):703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neu Transm. 2007;114(10):1265–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):404–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun S, Kleynen M, van Heel T, et al. The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain: J Neurol. 2011;134(5):1373–1386.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkerman HC, Ietswaart M, Johnston M, et al. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(5):538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti R, Tettamanti A, Gough PM, et al. Action observation versus motor imagery in learning a complex motor task: a short review of literature and a kinematics study. Neurosci Lett. 2013;540:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowles T, Clark A, Mares K, et al. Observation-to-imitate plus practice could add little to physical therapy benefits within 31 days of stroke: translational randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(2):173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewan LM, Kinmond K, Holmes PS. An observation-based intervention for stroke rehabilitation: experiences of eight individuals affected by stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(25):2097–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. NeuroImage. 2007;36 (Suppl 2):T164–T173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheless JW, Castillo E, Maggio V, et al. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic source imaging (MSI). Neurologist. 2004;10:138–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Luo Q, Kotecha R, et al. Accumulated source imaging of brain activity with both low and high-frequency neuromagnetic signals. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamalainen MS. Magnetoencephalography: a tool for functional brain imaging. Brain Topogr. 1992; 5:95–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riehle A, Vaadia E. Motor cortex in voluntary movements: a distributed system for distributed functions. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen P, Kringelbach M, Salmelin R. MEG: an introduction to methods, 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Burianova H, Marstaller L, Sowman P, et al. Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm. NeuroImage. 2013;71:50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araki T, Onishi M, Yanagisawa T, et al. Frequency-specific genetic influence on inferior parietal lobule activation commonly observed during action observation and execution. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17660.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauswald A, Tucciarelli R, Lingnau A. MEG adaptation reveals action representations in posterior occipitotemporal regions. Cortex. 2018;103:266–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu JD, Cheng CH, Tseng YJ, et al. Modulation of motor cortical activities by action observation and execution in patients with stroke: an MEG study. Neu Plast. 2019;2019:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Xiang J, Jiang W, et al. Altered effective connectivity network in childhood absence epilepsy: a multi-frequency MEG study. Brain Topogr. 2017;30(5):673–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger H. Uber das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Archiv f Psychiatrie. 1929;87(1):527–570.
   Google Scholar
• Buzsaki G. Rhythms of the brain. 1st ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Botcharova M, Berthouze L, Brookes MJ, et al. Resting state MEG oscillations show long-range temporal correlations of phase synchrony that break down during finger movement. Front Physiol. 2015;6:183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li F, Xiang J, Wu T, et al. Abnormal resting-state brain activity in headache-free migraine patients: A magnetoencephalography study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(8):2855–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, deGrauw X, Korostenskaja M, et al. Altered cortical activation in adolescents with acute migraine: a magnetoencephalography study. J Pain. 2013;14(12):1553–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Xiao Z. Spatiotemporal and frequency signatures of noun and verb processing: a wavelet-based beamformer study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009;31(6):648–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghuman AS, McDaniel JR, Martin A. A wavelet-based method for measuring the oscillatory dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in MEG. NeuroImage. 2011;56(1):69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Rienzo F, Joassy P, Kanthack T, et al. Effects of action observation and action observation combined with motor imagery on maximal isometric strength. Neuroscience. 2019;418:82–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ, et al. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. NeuroImage. 2007;37(4):1315–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola V, Keysers C. The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(6):1239–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandino L, Iacoboni M. Are cortical motor maps based on body parts or coordinated actions? Implications for embodied semantics. Brain Lang. 2010;112(1):44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorey B, Naumann T, Pilgramm S, et al. How equivalent are the action execution, imagery, and observation of intransitive movements? Revisiting the concept of somatotopy during action simulation. Brain Cogn. 2013;81(1):139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ma W, Zhang Y, et al. Neurocognitive impairment of mental rotation in major depressive disorder: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014;202(8):594–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca-Martinez F, Suso-Marti L, Grande-Alonso M, et al. Combining motor imagery with action observation training does not lead to a greater autonomic nervous system response than motor imagery alone during simple and functional movements: a randomized controlled trial. Peer J. 2018;6:e5142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szameitat AJ, Shen S, Conforto A, et al. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients. NeuroImage. 2012;62(1):266–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyek N, Di Rienzo F, Collet C, et al. The therapeutic role of motor imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(13):1113–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo S, Di Rienzo F, Bergeron V, et al. Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Rienzo F, Blache Y, Kanthack TF, et al. Short-term effects of integrated motor imagery practice on muscle activation and force performance. Neuroscience. 2015;305:146–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram TG, Kraeutner SN, Solomon JP, et al. Skill acquisition via motor imagery relies on both motor and perceptual learning. Behav Neurosci. 2016;130(2):252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir R, Dickstein R, Huberman M. Integration of motor imagery and physical practice in group treatment applied to subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(1):68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heremans E, Feys P, Nieuwboer A, et al. Motor imagery ability in patients with early- and mid-stage Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(2):168–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger I, Benyakov O, Erikh I, et al. Relaxation guided imagery reduces motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinson’s Dis. 2014;4(3):431–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunsky A, Dickstein R, Marcovitz E, et al. Home-based motor imagery training for gait rehabilitation of people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1580–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunsky A, Dickstein R, Ariav C, et al. Motor imagery practice in gait rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: four case studies. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29:351–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickstein R, Deutsch JE, Yoeli Y, et al. Effects of integrated motor imagery practice on gait of individuals with chronic stroke: a half-crossover randomized study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2119–2125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson WS, Lenz FA. Review of motor and phantom-related imagery. Neuroreport. 2011;22:939–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin KA, Moritz SE, Hall CR. Imagery use in sport: a literature review and applied model. Sport Psychol. 1999;13(3):245–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SM. Models of imagery in sport psychology: a review. J Ment Imag. 1990;14:153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Guillot A, Collet C. Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1(1):31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof KR, Brass M. How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works: a predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J Physiol. 2015;109(1–3):53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeon M, Guillot A, Sancho PO, et al. Rehabilitation of the elbow extension with motor imagery in a patient with quadriplegia after tendon transfer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(7):1143–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke: J Cereb Circ. 2006;37(7):1941–1952.
   Google Scholar