Conventional versus stereotactic image guided pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of a national longitudinal database

References

• Linte CA, Moore JT, Chen ECS, et al. Image-guided procedures: tools, techniques, and clinical applications. In Bioengineering for Surgery. Oxford: Chandos Publishing; 2016. p. 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• Luo M, Li N, Shen M, et al. Pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on complications and reoperations. Medicine (Baltimore. 2017;96(27):e7337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafi S, Munshi N, Abbas A, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(04):550–553.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:2040–2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenqvist UR, Link TM, Halm HF. Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1247–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykissas MG, Giannoulis D. Minimally invasive spine surgery for degenerative spine disease and deformity correction: a literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(6):99–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CYW, Kwan MK. Safety of pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Asian Spine J. 2017;11(6):998–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Jt Surg. 1995;77(8):1200–1206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, et al. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:E56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmi-Terander A, Burström G, Nachabe R, et al. Pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging: a first in-human prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(7):517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(2):247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SJ, Arun R, Bodrogi A, et al. The use of fusion mass screws in revision spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(S2):181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puvanesarajah V, Liauw JA, Lo S-F, et al. Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. WJO. 2014;5(2):112–123.
   Google Scholar
• Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, et al. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: Perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. WJO. 2017;8(7):524–530.
   Google Scholar
• Tian N-F, Xu H-Z. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop (Sicot). 2009;33(4):895–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E111–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holly LT. Image-guided spinal surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2006;2(1):7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. SPI. 2014;20(2):196–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao R, Miller JA, Sabharwal NC, et al. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(5):628–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(3):235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, et al. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. SPI. 2012;17(2):113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du JP, Fan Y, Wu QN, et al. Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 3 Image-Guided Navigation Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen K, Chen H, et al. Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease. Int Orthop. 2018;43(2):351–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian W, Zeng C, An Y, et al. Accuracy and postoperative assessment of pedicle screw placement during scoliosis surgery with computer-assisted navigation: a meta-analysis. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2017;13(1):e1732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Zhu Z, Sui T, et al. Position and complications of pedicle screw insertion with or without image-navigation techniques in the thoracolumbar spine: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Biomed Res. 2014;28:228–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan A, Parent E, Narvacan K, et al. Intraoperative image guidance compared with free-hand methods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal surgery: a systematic review on screw-related complications and breach rates. Spine J. 2017;17(9):1215–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn JM, Sakai DS. Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(S2):131– 137.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(11):E465–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staartjes VE, Klukowska AM, Schröder ML. Pedicle screw revision in robot-guided, navigated, and freehand thoracolumbar instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:433–443.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ughwanogho E, Patel NM, Baldwin KD, et al. Computed tomography–guided navigation of thoracic pedicle screws for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in more accurate placement and less screw removal. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:E473–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bydon M, Xu R, Amin AG, et al. Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography: consecutive series of 1148 pedicle screws. SPI. 2014;21(3):320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oʼdonnell C, Maertens A, Bompadre V, et al. Comparative radiation exposure using standard fluoroscopy versus cone-beam computed tomography for posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E850–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanski W, Zaluski R, Kokaveshi A, et al. Minimal invasive posterior correction of Lenke 5C idiopathic scoliosis: comparative analysis of minimal invasive vs. open surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(9):1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T-J, Kim K-T, Nakamura H, et al. The State of the Art in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villard J, Ryang Y-M, Demetriades AK, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(13):1004–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottmeier EW, Bowman C, Nelson KL. Surgeon radiation exposure in cone beam computed tomography-based, image-guided spinal surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2012;8(2):196–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dea N, Fisher CG, Batke J, et al. Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis. Spine J. 2016;16(1):23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins RG, 4th, Gupta A, Watkins RG. 3rd. Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery. TOORTHJ. 2010;4(1):228–233.
   Google Scholar
• Helm PA, Teichman R, Hartmann SL, et al. Spinal navigation and imaging: history, trends, and future. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(8):1738–1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanborn MR, Thawani JP, Whitmore RG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of confirmatory techniques for the placement of lumbar pedicle screws. FOC. 2012;33(1):E12.
   Google Scholar
• Costa F, Porazzi E, Restelli U, et al. Economic study: a cost-effectiveness analysis of an intraoperative compared with a preoperative image-guided system in lumbar pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1790–1796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Du J, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion among 4 guided technologies in spine surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:5960–5968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar