Comparison of DBR with CONWIP in an unbalanced production line with three stations

References

References

• Baker , KR , Powell , SG and Pyke , DF . 1994 . A predictive model for the throughput of unbalanced, unbuffered three-station serial line . IIE Transactions , 26 : 62 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvik , AM , Dallery , Y and Gershwin , SB . 2000 . Approximate analysis of production systems operated by a CONWIP/finite buffer hybrid control policy . International Journal of Production Research , 38 : 2845 – 2869 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravorty , SS . 1996 . Robert Bowden Inc.: a case study of cellular manufacturing and drum–buffer–rope implementation . Production and Inventory Management Journal , 37 : 15 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Chang , TM and Yih , Y . 1994 . Generic kanban systems for dynamic environments . International Journal of Production Research , 32 : 889 – 902 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook , DP . 1994 . Simulation comparison of traditional, JIT, and TOC manufacturing systems in a flow shop with bottlenecks . Production and Inventory Management Journal , 35 : 73 – 78 .
   Google Scholar
• Duenyas , I and Hopp , WJ . 1992 . CONWIP assembly with deterministic processing and random outages . IIE Transactions , 24 : 97 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duenyas , I and Keblis , MF . 1995 . Release policies for assembly systems . IIE Transactions , 27 : 507 – 518 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duri , C , Frein , Y and Lee , HS . 2000 . Performance evaluation and design of a CONWIP system with inspections . International Journal of Production Economics , 64 : 219 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Framinan , JM , Ruiz-Usano , R and Leisten , R . 2000 . Input control and dispatching rules in a dynamic CONWIP flow-shop . International Journal of Production Research , 38 : 4589 – 4598 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilland , WG . 2002 . A simulation study comparing performance of CONWIP and bottleneck-based release rules . Production Planning and Control , 13 : 211 – 219 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldratt EM Cox J 1984 The Goal New York North River
   Google Scholar
• Goldratt EM Fox RE 1986 The Race New York North River
   Google Scholar
• Gstettner , S and Kuhn , H . 1996 . Analysis of production control systems kanban and CONWIP . International Journal of Production Research , 34 : 3253 – 3273 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp , WJ and Roof , ML . 1998 . Setting WIP levels with statistical throughput control (STC) in CONWIP production lines . International Journal of Production Research , 36 : 867 – 882 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp , WJ and Spearman , ML . 1991 . Throughput of a constant work in process manufacturing line subject to failures . International Journal of Production Research , 29 : 635 – 655 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang , M , Wang , D and Ip , WH . 1998 . Simulation study of CONWIP for a cold rolling plant . International Journal of Production Economics , 54 : 257 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltenburg , J . 1997 . Comparing JIT, MRP and TOC, and embedding TOC into MRP . International Journal of Production Research , 35 : 1147 – 1169 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muckstadt , JA and Tayur , SR . 1995a . A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms. I. Background and structural results . IIE Transactions , 27 : 140 – 150 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muckstadt , JA and Tayur , SR . 1995b . A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms. II. Experimental results . IIE Transactions , 27 : 151 – 161 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , SG . 1994 . Buffer allocation in unbalanced three-station serial lines . International Journal of Production Research , 32 : 2201 – 2217 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , SG and Pyke , DF . 1996 . Allocation of buffers to serial production lines with bottlenecks . IIE Transactions , 28 : 18 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , SG and Pyke , DF . 1998 . Buffering unbalanced assembly systems . IIE Transactions , 30 : 55 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radovilsky , ZD . 1998 . A quantitative approach to estimate the size of the time buffer in the theory of constraints . International Journal of Production Economics , 55 : 113 – 119 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick , LM , Toland , J and Rodriguez , FP . 1994 . A simulation study of CONWIP versus MRP at Westinghouse . Computers and Industrial Engineering , 26 : 237 – 242 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel , GR and Fry , TD . 1997 . Order review/release and lot splitting in drum–buffer–rope . International Journal of Production Research , 35 : 827 – 845 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schragenheim , E and Ronen , B . 1990 . Drum–buffer–rope shop floor control . Production and Inventory Management Journal , 31 : 18 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Sivasubramanian , R , Selladurai , V and Rajamramasamy , N . 2000 . The effect of the drum–buffer–rope (DBR) approach on the performance of a synchronous manufacturing system (SMS) . Production Planning and Control , 11 : 820 – 824 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman , ML , Woodruff , DL and Hopp , WJ . 1990 . CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban . International Journal of Production Research , 28 : 879 – 894 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman , ML and Zazanis , MA . 1992 . Push and pull production systems: issues and comparisons . Operations Research , 40 : 521 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar