A combined QFD and integer programming framework to determine attribute levels for conjoint study

References

• Akao , Y . 1990 . QFD: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , Cambridge, MA : Productivity Press .
   Google Scholar
• Baier , D and Brusch , M . 2005a . “ Linking conjoint analysis and QFD for optimal product design ” . In Data analysis and decision support , Edited by: Baier , D , Decker , R and Schmidt-Thieme , L . 189 – 198 . Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Baier , D and Brusch , M . 2005b . Improving the predictive validity of quality function deployment by conjoint analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison . Operations Research Proceedings 2005, Selected papers of the Annual International Conference of the German Operations Research Society (GOR), Bremen, 7–9 September 2005 , : 619 – 624 .
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya , A , Sarkar , B and Mukherjee , SK . 2005 . Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective . International Journal of Production Research , 43 ( 17 ) : 3671 – 3685 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode , J and Fung , RYK . 1998 . Cost engineering with quality function deployment . Computers & Industrial Engineering , 35 ( 3–4 ) : 587 – 590 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , LH and Weng , MC . 2006 . An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models . European Journal of Operational Research , 172 ( 1 ) : 230 – 248 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y , Fung , RYK and Yang , J . 2005 . Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD . International Journal of Production Research , 43 ( 17 ) : 3583 – 3604 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson , D and Askin , RG . 1999 . Optimal New Product Design using quality function deployment with empirical value functions . Quality and Reliability Engineering International , 15 ( 1 ) : 17 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini , F and Rossetto , S . 1998 . Quality function deployment: How to improve its use . Total Quality Management , 9 ( 6 ) : 491 – 500 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung , RYK , Tang , J , Tu , Y and Wang , D . 2002 . Product design resources optimisation using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model . International Journal of Production Research , 40 ( 3 ) : 585 – 599 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green , PE and Srinivasan , V . 1990 . Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice . Journal of Marketing , 54 ( 4 ) : 3 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green , PE , Tull , DS and Albaum , G . 1994 . Research for marketing decisions , 5th , Delhi : Prentice Hall of India Private Limited .
   Google Scholar
• Iranmanesh , SH and Salimi , MH . 2003 . An investigation of rank reversal when using fuzzy importance levels in QFD analysis . International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering , 10 ( 2 ) : 195 – 203 .
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman , C , Ertay , T and Büyüközkan , G . 2006 . A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach . European Journal of Operational Research , 171 ( 2 ) : 390 – 411 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , EE . 2004 . Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritise design requirements in quality function deployment . Computers & Industrial Engineering , 47 ( 2–3 ) : 149 – 163 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , EE , Sozer , S and Alptekin , SE . 2003 . Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach . Computers & Industrial Engineering , 44 ( 1 ) : 171 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz , GM . 2004 . Practioner Note: a response to Pullman et al.'s (2002) Comparison of quality function deployment versus conjoint analysis . The Journal of Product Innovation and Management , 21 ( 1 ) : 61 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo , LP and Ho , NC . 1996 . Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system . International Journal of Production Research , 34 ( 2 ) : 299 – 311 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , K . 2000 . Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment . European Journal of Operational Research , 121 ( 3 ) : 504 – 518 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai , X , Tan , KC and Xie , M . 2007 . Optimizing product design using quantitative quality function deployment: a case study . Quality and Reliability Engineering International , 23 ( 1 ) : 45 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , ST . 2005 . Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach . International Journal of Production Research , 43 ( 3 ) : 497 – 513 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park , T and Kim , K . 1998 . Designing an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality . Journal of Operations Management , 16 ( 5 ) : 569 – 581 .
   Google Scholar
• Pullman , ME , Moore , WL and Wardell , DG . 2002 . A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design . The Journal of Product Innovation and Management , 19 ( 5 ) : 354 – 365 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raharjo , H , Xie , M and Brombacher , AC . 2006 . Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic Quality Function Deployment . International Journal of Production Research , 44 ( 23 ) : 5005 – 5018 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanegas , LV and Labib , AW . 2001 . Fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets . International Journal of Production Research , 39 ( 1 ) : 99 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman , GS . 1993 . On how to prioritise design requirements during the QFD planning process . IIE Transactions , 25 ( 3 ) : 59 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel , I . 2007 . Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development . Research in Engineering Design , 18 ( 1 ) : 21 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar