A simulation based approach to analyse the effects of job release on the performance of a multi-stage job-shop with processing flexibility

References

• Al-Turki , U , Andijani , A and Arifulsalam , S . 2004 . A new dispatching rule for the stochastic single-machine scheduling problem . Simulation-Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International , 80 ( 3 ) : 165 – 170 .
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu, A., Göçken, M., and Özbakır, L., 2007. A data mining approach to dispatching rule selection in a simulated job shop. In: M.J. Geiger and W. Habenicht, eds Proceedings of EU/ME 2007: ‘Metaheuristics in the service industry’, 8th workshop of the EURO working group ‘EU/ME, the European chapter on metaheuristics’, 4–5 October 2007 Stuttgart, Germany, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu , A , Göçken , M and Unutmaz , ZD . 2008 . New approaches to due date assignment in job shops . European Journal of Operational Research , 187 : 31 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breipthaupt , JW , Land , M and Nyhuis , P . 2002 . The workload control concept: theory and practical extensions of load oriented order release . Production Planning & Control , 13 ( 7 ) : 625 – 638 .
   Google Scholar
• Eilon , S and Chowdhury , IG . 1976 . Due-dates in job shop scheduling . International Journal of Production Research , 14 ( 2 ) : 223 – 237 .
   Google Scholar
• Enns , TS . 2000 . Evaluating shop-floor input control using rapid modeling . International Journal of Production Economics , 63 ( 3 ) : 229 – 241 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns , ST and Costa , MP . 2002 . The effectiveness of input control based on aggregate versus bottleneck work loads . Production Planning & Control , 13 ( 7 ) : 614 – 624 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göçken, M., 2009. A simulation based approach to develop new approaches for ‘due date assignment’ and ‘job release’ in multi-stage job shops. Thesis (PhD). Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, J.D., 1969. Controlling production capacity. In: Proceedings of the American Production and Inventory Control Society 12th annual conference. Chicago: APICS Press, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry , LC , Kingsman , BG and Cheung , P . 1998 . The effect of workload control (WLC) on performance in make-to-order companies . Journal of Operations Management , 16 ( 1 ) : 63 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Kingsman , B . 2000 . Modelling input-output workload control for dynamic capacity planning in production planning systems . International Journal of Production Economics , 68 ( 1 ) : 73 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsman , BG , Tatsiopoulus , IP and Hendry , LC . 1989 . A structural methodology for managing manufacturing lead times in make-to-order companies . European Journal of Operational Research , 40 ( 1 ) : 196 – 209 .
   Google Scholar
• Land, M. and Gaalman, G., 1996. Workload control concepts in job shops: a critical assessment. International Journal of Production Economics, 46–47, 535–548. [Proceedings of the 8th International working seminar on production economics].
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk , SA and Ragatz , GL . 1988 . Order review/release and its impact on the shop floor . Production and Inventory Management Journal , 29 ( 2 ) : 13 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk , SA and Ragatz , GL . 1989 . Order review/release: research issues and perspectives . International Journal of Production Research , 27 ( 7 ) : 1081 – 1096 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk , SA , Ragatz , GL and Fredendall , L . 1991 . Load smoothing by the planning and order review/release systems: a simulation experiment . Journal of Operations Management , 10 ( 4 ) : 512 – 523 .
   Google Scholar
• Moses , S . 2004 . Real-time due-date promising by build to order environments . International Journal of Production Research , 42 ( 20 ) : 4353 – 4375 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi , A and Rogers , P . Behavior of an order release mechanism in a make-to-order manufacturing system with selected order acceptance . In: Proceeding of the 2003 winter simulation conference . 7–10 December 2003 , New Orleans. pp. 1251 – 1259 .
   Google Scholar
• Nandi , A and Rogers , P . 2004 . Using simulation to make-to-order acceptance/rejection decision . Simulation , 80 ( 3 ) : 131 – 142 .
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson , TAJ and Pullen , RD . 1972 . A practical control system for optimizing production schedules . International Journal of Production Research , 16 ( 3 ) : 219 – 227 .
   Google Scholar
• Philipoom , PR and Fry , TD . 1992 . Capacity-based order review/release strategies to improve manufacturing performance . International Journal of Production Research , 30 ( 11 ) : 2559 – 2572 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaymakers , WM , Bertrand , JW and Fransoo , JF . 2000a . The performance of workload rules for order acceptance in batch chemical manufacturing . Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , 11 ( 2 ) : 217 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaymakers , WM , Bertrand , JW and Fransoo , JF . 2000b . Using aggregate estimation models for order acceptance in a decentralized production control structure for batch chemical manufacturing . IIE Transactions , 32 ( 10 ) : 989 – 998 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghu , TS and Rajendran , C . 1995 . Due-date setting methodologies based on simulated annealing – an experimental study in a real-life job shop . International Journal of Production Research , 33 ( 9 ) : 2535 – 2554 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha , DY and Liu , CH . 2004 . Using data mining for due date assignment in a dynamic job shop environment . International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 25 ( 11–12 ) : 1164 – 1174 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , ML and Seidman , A . 1983 . Due date selection procedures for job-shop simulation . Computers & Industrial Engineering , 7 ( 3 ) : 199 – 207 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson , M and Hendry , L . 2006 . Aggregate load-oriented workload control: a review and a re-classification of a key approach . International Journal of Production Economics , 104 ( 2 ) : 676 – 693 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai , C-H , Chang , G-T and Li , R-K . 1997 . Integrating order release control with due-date assignment rules . International Journal of Production Research , 35 ( 12 ) : 3379 – 3392 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veral , EA . 2001 . Computer simulation of due-date setting in multi-machine job shops . Computes & Industrial Engineering , 41 ( 1 ) : 77 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Vig , MM and Dooley , KJ . 1991 . Dynamic rules for due date assignment . International Journal of Production Research , 29 ( 7 ) : 1361 – 1377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , J , Yang , JQ and Lee. , H . 1994 . Multicriteria order acceptance decision support in over demanded job-shops: a neural network approach . Mathematical and Computer Modelling , 19 ( 5 ) : 1 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks , JK and Fryer , JS . 1977 . A methodology for assigning minimum cost due-dates . Management Science , 25 ( 4 ) : 363 – 373 .
   Google Scholar
• Wester , FW , Wijngaard , J and Zijm , WM . 1992 . Order acceptance strategies in a production-to-order environment with setup times and due-dates . International Journal Production Research , 30 ( 6 ) : 1313 – 1326 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wight , O . 1970 . Input/output control: a real handle on lead time . Production and Inventory Management , 3 ( 3 ) : 9 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Wouters , MJ . 1997 . Relevant cost information for order acceptance decisions . Production Planning & Control , 8 ( 1 ) : 2 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapfel , G and Missbauer , H . 1993 . New concepts for production planning and control . European Journal of Operational Research , 67 ( 3 ) : 297 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar