Allocation of emission permits using DEA: centralised and individual points of view

References

• Ackerman, F., and W. Moomaw. 1997. “SO2 Emissions Trading Does it Work?” Electricity Journal 10(7): 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ahman, M., D. Burtraw, J. Kruger, and L. Zetterberg. 2007. “A Ten-year Rule to Guide the Allocation of EU Emission Allowances.” Energy Policy 35(3): 1718–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. C., and S. Talluri. 1997. “Closer Look at the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Technology Selection.” Computers and Industrial Engineering 32(1): 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg S. A., F. R. Forsund, and E.S. Jansen. 1992. Malmquist indices of Productivity Growth During The Deregulation of Norwegian banking 1980–1989. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94 (0):211–228 (Supplement).
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., and M. Braglia. 2002. “Environmental Efficiency Analysis for ENI Oil Refineries.” Journal of Cleaner Production 10(1): 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohringer, C., and A. Lange. 2005. “On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances.” European Economic Review 49(8): 2041–2055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, S. 1988. “On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Operating Licenses.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(2): 357–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D., K. L. Palmer, R. Bharvurkar, and A. Paul. 2001. The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emissions Trading. Discussion Paper 01–30, Resources for the Future, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Cason, T. N., and L. Gangadharan. 2003. “Transactions Costs in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 23(2): 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(4): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. H., R. Färe, and S. Grosskopf. 1997. “Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach.” Journal of Environmental Management 51(3): 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, P., and S. Kerr. 2002. “Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions. How and Why to Auction and not Grandfather.” Energy Policy 30(4): 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyckhoff, H., and K. Allen. 2001. “Measuring Ecological Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).” European Journal of Operational Research 132(2): 312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., A. L. Anouze, and E. Thanassoulis. 2010. “A Semi-oriented Radial Measure for Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units with Negative Data, Using DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research 200(1): 297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshel, D. 2005. “Optimal Allocation of Tradable Pollution Rights and Market Structures.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 28(2): 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., and A. Fox. 2004. Output-based Allocations of Emissions Permits: Efficiency and Distributional Effects in a General Equilibrium Setting with Taxes and Trade. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, RFF Discussion Paper 04–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., and A. K. Fox. 2007. “Output-based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions.” Land Economics 83(4): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., I. Parry, and D. Burtaw. 1997. “Revenue-raising Versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Preexisting Tax Distortions.” The RAND Journal of Economics 28(4): 708–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., I. A. W. Parry, R. C. Williams III, and D. Burtraw. 1999. “The Cost-effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-best Setting.” Journal of Public Economics 72(3): 329–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, A., and T. S. Veeman. 2001. “Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3): 805–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haites, E. 2003. “Output-based Allocation as a Form of Protection for Internationally Competitive Industries.” Climate Policy 3(2): S29–S41.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J., and T. N. Rasmussen. 2000. “Allocation of CO2 Emissions Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40(2): 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, R. J. 2007. “Allowance Allocation.” In Assessing U.S. Climate Policy Options: A Report Summarizing Work at RFF as part of the Inter-industry U.S. Climate Policy Forum, edited by R. J. Kopp, and W. A. Pizer, 87–93. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, P. J., and M. Luptacik. 2004. “Eco-efficiency Analysis of Power Plants: An Extension of Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 154(2): 437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., G. Villa, and R. Brannlund. 2009. “Centralised Reallocation of Emission Permits using DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research 193(3): 752–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, I. A., N. Hanley, and T. Kornienko. 2008. “The Optimal Initial Allocation of Pollution Permits: A Relative Performance Approach.” Environ Resource Economic 39(3): 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mária, B. L., and P. Gabriella. 2005. The Polluter Profits Principle: A Note on The Grandfathering of CO2 Emissions Rights in Lax-Cap Trading Regimes. Budapest: Regional Centre for Energy Policy Research, Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., K. Keats Martinez, and M. Sato. 2006. “Allocation, Incentives and Distortions: The Impact of EU ETS Emissions Allowance Allocations to the Electricity Sector.” Climate Policy 6(1): 73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, T. 2001. “The Effects of Emission Permits on Growth and the Environment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 21(1): 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. W., C. U. Kim, and W. Isard. 2012. “Permit Allocation in Emissions Trading using the Boltzmann Distribution.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391(20): 4883–4890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzy, J. C. V., and A. Park. 1998. “Reflections on the Double Dividend Debate.” Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3): 539–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., E. Reig-Martinez, and F. Hernandez-Sancho. 2005. “Directional Distance Functions and Environmental Regulation.” Resource and Energy Economics 27(2): 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela, M. C. A. S., E. Thanassoulis, and G. Simpson. 2004. “Negative Data in DEA: A Directional Distance Approach Applied to Bank Branches.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 55: 1111–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. 2002. “Combing Indicators of Energy Consumption and CO2 emissions: A Cross-country Comparison.” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 17(3): 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Requate, T., and W. Unold. 2003. “Environmental Policy Incentives to Adopt Advanced Abatement Technology: Will the True Ranking Please Stand Up?” European Economic Review 47(1): 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., and J. Zhu. 2002. “Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation.” European Journal of Operational Research 142(1): 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. A., W. Meng, and W. Liu. 2007. “A Modified Slacks-based Measure Model for Data Envelopment Analysis with ‘Natural’ Negative Outputs and Inputs.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 1672–1677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. N. 1998. “What can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 9–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda, S., T. H. Arimura, H. Tamechika, C. Fischer, and A. K. Fox. 2011. Output-based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating the Leakage and Competitiveness Issues for the Japanese Economy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, RFF Discussion Paper 11–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., S. Du, L. Liang, Y. Zhou. 2012. “A DEA Based Approach for Fair Reduction and Reallocation of Emission Permits.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 58 (5–6): 1095–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., D. D. Wu, L. Liang, and L. O’Neill. 2011. “Competition Strategy and Efficiency Evaluation for Decision Making Units with Fixed-sum Outputs.” European Journal of Operational Research 212(3): 560–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., and B. W. Ang. 2008. “Linear Programming Models for Measuring Economy Wide Energy Efficiency Performance.” Energy Policy 36(8): 2911–2916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., B. W. Ang, and K. L. Poh. 2008. “A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies.” European Journal of Operational Research 189(1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar