Optimisation of the concurrent product and process configuration: an approach to reduce computation time with an experimental evaluation

References

• Aldanondo, M., and E. Vareilles. 2008. “Configuration for Mass Customization: How to Extend Product Configuration towards Requirements and Process Configuration.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19 (5): 521–535. doi: 10.1007/s10845-008-0135-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascione, F., N. Bianco, C. De Stasio, G. Mauro, and G. Vanoli. 2016. “Multi-stage and Multi-objective Optimization for Energy Retrofitting a Developed Hospital Reference Building: A New Approach to Assess Cost-optimality.” Applied Energy 174: 37–68. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartak, R., M. A. Salido, and F. Rossi. 2010. “Constraint Satisfaction Techniques in Planning and Scheduling.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.1007/s10845-008-0203-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechikh, S., M. Kessentini, L. B. Said, and K. Ghedira. 2015. “Preference Incorporation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Survey of the State-of-the-art.” Advances in Computers 98: 141–207. doi: 10.1016/bs.adcom.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessiere, C. 2006. “Constraint Propagation.” Chap. 3 in Handbook of Constraint Programming, edited by Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, and Toby Walsh, 29–70. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Blot, A., M. Kessaci, and L. Jourdan. 2018. “Survey and Unification of Local Search Techniques in Metaheuristics for Multi-objective Combinatorial Optimization.” Journal of Heuristics 24 (6): 853–877. doi: 10.1007/s10732-018-9381-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagna, D., and A. Formisano. 2013. “Product and Production Process Modeling and Configuration.” Fundamenta Informaticae 124 (4): 403–425.
   Google Scholar
• Coello Coello, Carlos A., Gary B. Lamont, and David A. Van Veldhuizen. 2007. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Series). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, R., C. Zong, and M. Li. 2016. “An Interactive Genetic Algorithm with the Interval Arithmetic Based on Hesitation and its Application to Achieve Customer Collaborative Product Configuration Design.” Applied Soft Computing Journal 38 (1): 384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Gang, Jiao Roger J., and Chen Mo. 2014. “Joint Optimization of Product Family Configuration and Scaling Design by Stackelberg Game.” European Journal of Operational Research 232 (2): 330–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfernig, A., L. Hotz, C. Baglay, and J. Tiihonen. 2014. Knowledge-based Configuration from Research to Business Cases. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischanderl, G., G. Friedrich, A. Haselböck, H. Schreiner, and M. Stumptner. 1998. “Configuring Large Systems Using Generative Constraint Satisfaction.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 13 (4): 59–68. doi: 10.1109/5254.708434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdy, M., A. Hasan, and K. Siren. 2013. “A Multi-stage Optimization Method for Cost-optimal and Nearly-zero-energy Building Solutions in Line with the EPBD-recast 2010.” Energy and Buildings 56: 189–203. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoos, H., and T. Stützle. 2004. Stochastic Local Search-foundations and Applications. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hotz, L., A. Felfernig, M. Stumptner, A. Ryabokon, C. Bagley, and K. Wolter. 2014. “Configuration Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.” Chap. 6 in Knowledge-based Configuration from Research to Business Cases, edited by Alexander Felfernig, Lothar Hotz, Claire Bagley, and Juha Tiihonen, 41–72. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, J. Y., W. J. Yu, and J. Zhang. 2017. “A Two-stage Coevolution Approach for Constrained Optimization.” Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO'17, Berlin, Germany, July 15–19, 167–168.
   Google Scholar
• Junker, U. 2006. “Configuration.” Chap. 24 in Handbook of Constraint Programming, edited by Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, and Toby Walsh, 835–875. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H., K. Seppänenand, and J. Huiskonen. 2014. “Identifying Product and Process Configuration Requirements in a Decentralised Service Delivery System.” International Journal of Services and Operations Management 17 (3): 294–310. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.059561
   Google Scholar
• Konstantas, D., S. Ioannidis, V. S. Kouikoglou, and E. Grigoroudis. 2018. “Linking Product Quality and Customer Behavior for Performance Analysis and Optimization of Make-to-order Manufacturing Systems.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 95 (1–4): 587–596. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-1225-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koubarakis, M. 2006. “Temporal CSPs.” Chap. 19 in Handbook of Constraint Programming, edited by Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, and Toby Walsh, 663–697. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lhomme, O. 1993. “Consistency Techniques for Numerical CSPs.” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI 93: 232–238.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, J., S. Lindkvist, and J. Sjoberg. 2012. “Two Step Framework for Interactive Multi-objective Optimization.” Technical Report LiTH-ISY-R-3043, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linkoping University.
   Google Scholar
• López Jaimes, A., and C. Coello Coello. 2013. “Interactive Approaches Applied to Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms.” Chap. 8 in Multicriteria Decision Aid and Artificial Intelligence: Links, Theory and Applications, edited by Michael Doumpos and Evangelos Grigoroudis, 191–208. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mailharro, D. 1998. “A Classification and Constraint-based Framework for Configuration.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12 (4): 383–397. doi: 10.1017/S0890060498124101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, W., M. Stumptner, P. Killisperger, and G. Grossmann. 2011. “A Declarative Framework for Work Process Configuration.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 25 (2): 143–162. doi: 10.1017/S0890060410000594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezura-Montes, E., and C. Coello Coello. 2011. “Constraint-handling in Nature-inspired Numerical Optimization: Past, Present and Future.” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1 (4): 173–194. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K., F. Ruiz, and A. P. Wierzbicki. 2008. “Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive Approaches.” In Multiobjective Optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5252, edited by J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen, and R. Słowiński, 27–57. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, S., and F. Frayman. 1989. “Towards a Generic Model of Configuration Tasks.” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2: 1395–1401.
   Google Scholar
• Montanari, U. 1974. “Networks of Constraints: Fundamental Properties and Application to Picture Processing.” Information Sciences 7: 95–132. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(74)90008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monz, M., K. Küfer, T. Bortfeld, and C. Thieke. 2008. “Pareto Navigation: Algorithmic Foundation of Interactive Multi-criteria IMRT Planning.” Physics in Medicine and Biology 53: 985–998. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Ramon E. 1966. Interval Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pitiot, P., M. Aldanondo, and E. Vareilles. 2014. “Concurrent Product Configuration and Process Planning: Some Optimization Experimental Results.” Computers in Industry 65 (4): 610–621. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2014.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitiot, P., M. Aldanondo, E. Vareilles, P. Gaborit, M. Djefel, and S. Carbonnel. 2013. “Concurrent Product Configuration and Process Planning, towards an Approach Combining Interactivity and Optimality.” International Journal of Production Research 51 (2): 524–541. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.653449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitiot, P., L. Garcés Monge, E. Vareilles, and M. Aldanondo. 2016. “Benchmark for Configuration and Planning Optimization Problems: Proposition of a Generic Model.” Proceedings of the 18th International Configuration Workshop (within CP 2016 Conference), Toulouse, France, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sabin, D., and E. Freuder. 1996. “Configuration as Composite Constraint Satisfaction.” Proceedings of the AAAI 1996 Workshop on Configuration, 28–36. AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabin, D., and R. Weigel. 1998. “Product Configuration Frameworks – a Survey.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 13 (4): 42–49. doi: 10.1109/5254.708432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schierholt, K. 2001. “Process Configuration: Combining the Principles of Product Configuration and Process Planning.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 15 (5): 411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., P. Korhonen, J. Wallenius, and K. Deb. 2014. “An Interactive Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm with a Limited Number of Decision Maker Calls.” European Journal of Operational Research 233 (3): 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, D., Q. Wang, and I. Ullah. 2017. “Optimisation of Product Configuration in Consideration of Customer Satisfaction and Low Carbon.” International Journal of Production Research 55 (12): 3349–3373. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1231430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, H., C. Chang, and S. Chang. 2005. “Applying Case-based Reasoning for Product Configuration in Mass Customization Environments.” Expert Systems with Applications 29 (4): 913–925. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beek, P. 2006. “Backtracking Search Algorithms.” Chap. 4 in Handbook of Constraint Programming, edited by Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, and Toby Walsh, 85–134. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., S. S. Zhong, and Y. J. Zhang. 2017. “Process Configuration Based on Generative Constraint Satisfaction Problem.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28: 945–957. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-1031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W., W. Fan, and Z. Li. 2014. “Multi-objective Optimization and Evaluation Method of Modular Product Configuration Design Scheme.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 75 (9–12): 1527–1536. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6240-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, S. R., Y. Dashora, R. Shankar, F. Chan, and M. Tiwari. 2008. “An Interactive Particle Swarm Optimisation for Selecting a Product Family and Designing its Supply Chain.” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 31 (3/4): 168–186. doi: 10.1504/IJCAT.2008.018155
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., E. Vareilles, and M. Aldanondo. 2013. “Generic Bill of Functions, Materials, and Operations for SAP 2 Configuration.” International Journal of Production Research 51 (2): 465–478. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.652745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L. Y., H. F. Dong, P. Vichare, A. Nassehi, and S. T. Newman. 2008. “Systematic Modeling and Reusing of Process Knowledge for Rapid Process Configuration.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 (6): 763–772. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., X. Xu, S. Yu, and C. Liu. 2017. “Personalized Product Configuration Framework in an Adaptable Open Architecture Product Platform.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 43: 422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. 2001. “SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm.” Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Communication Networks Lab (TIK). Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., and L. Thiele. 1998. “Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms – A Comparative Case Study.” In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1498, edited by A. E. Eiben, T. Bäck, M. Schoenauer, and H. P. Schwefel, 292–301. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar