Industry 5.0 use cases development framework

References

• Abdous, M.-A., X. Delorme, D. Battini, and S. Berger-Douce. 2022. “Multi-objective Collaborative Assembly Line Design Problem with the Optimisation of Ergonomics and Economics.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (22): 7830–7845. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2153185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attaran, M., and B. G. Celik. 2023. “Digital Twin: Benefits, Use Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities.” Decision Analytics Journal 6: 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H., D. A. Mindell, E. Reynolds, and R. M. Solow. 2022. The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila-Gutiérrez, M. J., F. Aguayo-González, and J. R. Lama-Ruiz. 2021. “Framework for the Development of Affective and Smart Manufacturing Systems Using Sensorised Surrogate Models.” Sensors 21 (7): Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betella, A., and P. F. Verschure. 2016. “The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions.” PLoS One 11 (2): e0148037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdu, É, M.-M. Péretié, and M. Richer. 2016. La qualité de vie au travail: Un levier de compétitivité refonder les organisations du travail (1–1). Paris (France): Presses des mines-Transvalor La Fabrique de l’industrie.
   Google Scholar
• Brey, P. 1999. “Worker Autonomy and the Drama of Digital Networks in Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006199816737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, A., M. Godinho Filho, and A. G. Frank. 2020. “Smart Production Planning and Control in the Industry 4.0 Context: A Systematic Literature Review.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 149: 106774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagliano, R., F. Canterino, A. Longoni, and E. Bartezzaghi. 2019. “The Interplay Between Smart Manufacturing Technologies and Work Organization: The Role of Technological Complexity.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 39 (6/7/8): 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzavara, M., D. Battini, D. Bogataj, F. Sgarbossa, and I. Zennaro. 2020. “Ageing Workforce Management in Manufacturing Systems: State of the art and Future Research Agenda.” International Journal of Production Research 58 (3): 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1600759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzavara, M., M. Faccio, and I. Granata. 2023. “Multi-objective Task Allocation for Collaborative Robot Systems with an Industry 5.0 Human-Centered Perspective.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 128 (1): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11673-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo, V., M. Rinaldini, J. Staccioli, and M. E. Virgillito. 2021. “Technology vs. Workers: The Case of Italy’s Industry 4.0 Factories.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 56: 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danjou, C., R. Pellerin, and L. Rivest. 2017. Le passage au numérique: Industrie 4.0: des pistes pour aborder l’ère du numérique et de la connectivité, 26. Québec (Canada): Centre francophone d’informatisation des organisations (CEFRIO). https://espace2.etsmtl.ca/id/eprint/14934/1/le-passage-au-num%C3%A9rique.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. “The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-Determination in Personality.” Journal of Research in Personality 19 (2): 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, J. 1995. Job autonomy, well-being, and health: A study among Dutch health care workers. Maastricht (Netherlands): Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• De Pace, F., F. Manuri, A. Sanna, and C. Fornaro. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Interfaces for Collaborative Industrial Robots.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 149: 106806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paula Ferreira, W., F. Armellini, L. A. de Santa-Eulalia, and V. Thomasset-Laperrière. 2022. “A Framework for Identifying and Analysing Industry 4.0 Scenarios.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 65: 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Terssac, G. 2012. “Autonomie et travail.” In Dictionnaire du travail, edited by PUF, 47–53. Toulouse (France): PUF. https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-00846542.
   Google Scholar
• Doellken, M., J. Zapata, N. Thomas, and S. Matthiesen. 2021. “Implementing Innovative Gaze Analytic Methods in Design for Manufacturing: A Study on eye Movements in Exploiting Design Guidelines.” Procedia CIRP 100: 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.097.
   Google Scholar
• Dornelles, J., A. de, N. F. Ayala, and A. G. Frank. 2022. “Smart Working in Industry 4.0: How Digital Technologies Enhance Manufacturing Workers’ Activities.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 163: 107804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle-Kent, M., and P. Kopacek. 2021. “Adoption of Collaborative Robotics in Industry 5.0. An Irish Industry Case Study.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 54 (13): 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.483.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle-Kent, M., and B. W. Shanahan. 2022. “The Development of a Novel Educational Model to Successfully Upskill Technical Workers for Industry 5.0: Ireland a Case Study.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (39): 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.12.072.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, D. 2017. “Field Experiments in Organizations.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 4: 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062400.
   Google Scholar
• Enang, E., M. Bashiri, and D. Jarvis. 2023. “Exploring the Transition from Techno Centric Industry 4.0 Towards Value Centric Industry 5.0: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (22): 7866–7902. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2221344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, M. H., H. Jafari, L. Achtenhagen, J. Carlbäck, and A. Wong. 2021. “Financial Performance and Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities: The Moderating Role of Industry 4.0 Technologies.” International Journal of Production Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1966850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. 2021. Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human Centric and Resilient European Industry. Brussels (Belgium): Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Everaere, C. 2007. “Proposition d’un outil d’évaluation de l’autonomie dans le travail.” Revue française de gestion 34 (11): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.180.45-59.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda, E., and A. Meneghetti. 2022. “The Human-Centric SMED.” Sustainability 14 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazzon, E. M., J. Hartmann, T. Makuschewitz, and B. Scholz-Reiter. 2013. “Towards Socio-Cyber-Physical Systems in Production Networks.” Procedia CIRP 7: 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.009.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., and E. L. Deci. 2005. “Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 26: 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., M. Li, and S. Sun. 2022. “Field Experiments in Operations Management.” Journal of Operations Management, 676–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, N., W. Shao, M. S. Rahaman, and F. D. Salim. 2020. “N-gage: Predicting in-Class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild.” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4 (3): 1–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia, A., M. Quartulli, I. G. Olaizola, and I. Barandiaran. 2022. Relevance of Visualization and Interaction Technologies for Industry 5.0. 3214. Valencia (Spain): Scopus.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, M., Y. Cohen, and G. Singer. 2020. “A Framework for Operator – Workstation Interaction in Industry 4.0.” International Journal of Production Research 58 (8): 2421–2432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1639842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse, E. H. 2023. “Application of Supportive and Substitutive Technologies in Manual Warehouse Order Picking: A Content Analysis.” International Journal of Production Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2169383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., R. J. Vallerand, and C. Blanchard. 2000. “On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS).” Motivation and Emotion 24: 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, D., P. Lin, Z. Lyu, S. Ling, M. Li, G. Q. Huang, and Y. Rong. 2019. “Towards Assembly 4.0: Graduation Intelligent Manufacturing System for Fixed-Position Assembly Islands.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (13): 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.414.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., and G. R. Oldham. 1976. “Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., and L. E. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research.” In Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52, edited by P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, 139–183. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, M., A. Malikova, and J. Kembro. 2023. “Rooting out the Root Causes of Order Fulfilment Errors: A Multiple Case Study.” International Journal of Production Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2251060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S. 2009. “Designing Experiments That Generalize.” Organizational Research Methods 12 (3): 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. 2022. “The Industry 5.0 Framework: Viability-Based Integration of the Resilience, Sustainability, and Human-Centricity Perspectives.” International Journal of Production Research 61: 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, I., I. Spence, and K. Bittner. 2011. Use-Case 2.0, The Guide to Succeeding with Use Cases. Ivar Jacobson International.
   Google Scholar
• Joblot, L., F. Magnani, F. Rosin, M. Passalacqua, and R. Pellerin. 2023. Protocole expérimental visant l’étude de l’IA centrée sur l’humain dans le contexte de l’Industrie 5.0: Application en réalité augmentée.
   Google Scholar
• Kaasinen, E., F. Schmalfuß, C. Özturk, S. Aromaa, M. Boubekeur, J. Heilala, P. Heikkilä, et al. 2020. “Empowering and Engaging Industrial Workers with Operator 4.0 Solutions.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 139: 105678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katok, E. 2011. “Laboratory Experiments in Operations Management.” In Transforming Research Into Action, edited by Informs, 15–35. Catonsville (Maryland): INFORMS.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-G., E.-J. Cheon, D.-S. Bai, Y. H. Lee, and B.-H. Koo. 2018. “Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.” Psychiatry Investigation 15 (3): 235. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.08.17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G. 2008. “Naturalistic Decision Making.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50 (3): 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., P. Gupta, S. Singh, and D. Jain. 2021. “Human Empowerment by Industry 5.0 in Digital Era: Analysis of Enablers.” In Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering, edited by R. K. Phanden, K. Mathiyazhagan, R. Kumar, and J. Paulo Davim, 401–410. Singapore (Singapore): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Z.-H., W. Tao, M. C. Leu, and Z. Yin. 2020. “Smart Augmented Reality Instructional System for Mechanical Assembly Towards Worker-Centered Intelligent Manufacturing.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 55: 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesch, V., M. Züfle, A. Bauer, L. Iffländer, C. Krupitzer, and S. Kounev. 2023. “A Literature Review of IoT and CPS – What They are, and What They are not.” Journal of Systems and Software 200: 111631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenstein, S., C. Prantera, V. Varvo, M. L. Scribano, E. Berto, C. Luzi, and A. Andreoli. 1993. “Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: A new Tool for Psychosomatic Research.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 37 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(93)90120-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, H.-W. 2023. “A Data-Driven Decision Support System for Sustainable Supplier Evaluation in the Industry 5.0 Era: A Case Study for Medical Equipment Manufacturing.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, F., L. Nicoletti, and A. Padovano. 2017. “Smart Operators in Industry 4.0: A Human-Centered Approach to Enhance Operators’ Capabilities and Competencies Within the new Smart Factory Context.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 113: 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, F., A. Padovano, and S. Umbrello. 2020. “Value-oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future.” Applied Sciences 10 (12): 4182–4125. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10124182.
   Google Scholar
• Macal, C. M., and M. J. North. 2009. “Tutorial on Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation.” Journal of Simulation 4 (3): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2010.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddikunta, P. K. R., Q. V. Pham, B. Prabadevi, N. Deepa, K. Dev, T. R. Gadekallu, R. Ruby, and M. Liyanage. 2021. “Industry 5.0: A Survey on Enabling Technologies and Potential Applications.” Journal of Industrial Information Integration 26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghazei, O., M. A. Lewis, and T. H. Netland. 2022. “Emerging Technologies and the use Case: A Multi-Year Study of Drone Adoption.” Journal of Operations Management 68 (6–7): 560–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltseva Reiby, K. 2020. “Wearables in the Workplace: The Brave new World of Employee Engagement.” Business Horizons 63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margherita, E. G., and A. M. Braccini. 2021. “Managing Industry 4.0 Automation for Fair Ethical Business Development: A Single Case Study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C., J. Cegarra, and P. Averty. 2011. “Analysis of Mental Workload During En-Route Air Traffic Control Task Execution Based on Eye-Tracking Technique.” In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, edited by D. Harris, 592–597. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meindl, B., N. F. Ayala, J. Mendonça, and A. G. Frank. 2021. “The Four Smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten Years of Research and Future Perspectives.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168: 120784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. B. 2001. “A Case in Case Study Methodology.” Field Methods 13 (4): 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0101300402.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani, and A. Théorêt. 1976. “The Structure of “Unstructured” Decision Processes.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (2): 246–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, F., F. M. Monetti, A. Torayev, H. U. Rehman, J. A. Mulet Alberola, N. Rea Minango, H. N. Nguyen, A. Maffei, and J. C. Chaplin. 2023. “A Maturity Model for the Autonomy of Manufacturing Systems.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 126 (1): 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10910-7.
   Google Scholar
• Moencks, M., E. Roth, T. Bohné, D. Romero, and J. Stahre. 2022. “Augmented Workforce Canvas: A Management Tool for Guiding Human-Centric, Value-Driven Human-Technology Integration in Industry.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 163: 107803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya, A., L. Bastida, P. Aguirrezabal, M. Pantano, and P. Abril-Jiménez. 2023. “Augmented Reality for Supporting Workers in Human–Robot Collaboration.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 7 (4), https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7040040.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J. 2020. Enabling Technologies for Industry 5.0: Results of a Workshop with Europe’s Technology Leaders. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, A., X. Mahiques, J. E. Solanes, A. Martí, L. Gracia, and J. Tornero. 2019. “Mixed Reality-Based User Interface for Quality Control Inspection of car Body Surfaces.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 53: 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahavandi, S. 2019. “Industry 5.0 – A Human-Centric Solution.” Sustainability 11 (16): Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Ngoc, H., G. Lasa, and I. Iriarte. 2022. “Human-centred Design in Industry 4.0: Case Study Review and Opportunities for Future Research.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 33 (1): 35–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01796-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourmohammadi, A., M. Fathi, and A. H. C. Ng. 2022. “Balancing and Scheduling Assembly Lines with Human-Robot Collaboration Tasks.” Computers & Operations Research 140: 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. 2023. Decision Model and Notation Specification. Milford, MA: Object Management Group. https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/1.4/PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., and A. Cummings. 1996. “Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (3): 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olhager, J., and A. Feldmann. 2022. “Linking Plant Roles and Operations Strategy Decision-Making Autonomy in International Manufacturing Networks.” International Journal of Production Research 60 (1): 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1991026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordieres-Meré, J., M. Gutierrez, and J. Villalba-Díez. 2023. “Toward the Industry 5.0 Paradigm: Increasing Value Creation Through the Robust Integration of Humans and Machines.” Computers in Industry 150: 103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orso, V., R. Ziviani, G. Bacchiega, G. Bondani, A. Spagnolli, and L. Gamberini. 2022. “Employee-centric Innovation: Integrating Participatory Design and Video-Analysis to Foster the Transition to Industry 5.0.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 173: 108661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagou, S., W. P. Neumann, and F. Fruggiero. 2023. “A Scoping Review of Human Robot Interaction Research Towards Industry 5.0 Human-Centric Workplaces.” International Journal of Production Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2172473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. W., and J. Shintaku. 2022. “Sustainable Human–Machine Collaborations in Digital Transformation Technologies Adoption: A Comparative Case Study of Japan and Germany.” Sustainability 14 (17): Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., and C. G. Collins. 2010. “Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors.” Journal of Management 36 (3): 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., H. M. Williams, and N. Turner. 2006. “Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (3): 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, M., R. Pellerin, P. Doyon-Poulin, L. Del-Aguila, J. Boasen, and P.-M. Léger. 2022. “Human-Centred AI in the Age of Industry 5.0: A Systematic Review Protocol.” HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Papers: Interacting with eXtended Reality and Artificial Intelligence: 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26 – July 1, 2022, Proceedings, 483–492.
   Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, M., R. Pellerin, F. Magnani, L. Joblot, E. Yahia, F. Rosin, and P.-M. Léger. 2023. L’origine de l’objectif est-elle importante? Effets motivationnels d’objectifs autodéfinis en production.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. C., A. C. Alves, and P. Arezes. 2023. “Augmented Reality in a Lean Workplace at Smart Factories: A Case Study.” Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 13 (16), https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169120.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., F. Grandi, and M. Pellicciari. 2017. “Benchmarking of Tools for User Experience Analysis in Industry 4.0.” Procedia Manufacturing 11: 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.182.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., F. Grandi, and M. Pellicciari. 2020. “Exploring the Potential of Operator 4.0 Interface and Monitoring.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 139: 105600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzone, M., F. Albè, D. Orlandelli, I. Barletta, C. Berlin, B. Johansson, and M. Taisch. 2020. “A Framework for Operative and Social Sustainability Functionalities in Human-Centric Cyber-Physical Production Systems.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 139: 105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquet, A. 2009. Guide pratique du travail collaboratif: Théories, méthodes et outils au service de la collaboration. https://www.a-brest.net/IMG/pdf/Guide_pratique_du_travail_collaboratif.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, P. H., and J. B. Atwater. 2022. ASCM Supply Chain Dictionary, 17th Edition: Vol. Seventeenth edition. https://learn.ascm.org/apex/scormanywhere__SCORM_Player?FAqGV66Nj7RqVQmX7Q%2FQyfyTRwQfpbMavclgeCw9ORdUeifhwoVy%2FLhLIEz9U%2B2w%2BqsyzlVgMphlGtJbKdZZvQ%3D%3D.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N. A., J. Muda, M. F. Mohammad, F. Ahmad, S. A. Rahim, and F. Mayor-Vitoria. 2019. “Digitalization and Leap Frogging Strategy Among the Supply Chain Member: Facing GIG Economy and Why Should Logistics Players Care?” International Journal of Supply Chain Management 8: 1042–1048. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Digitalization-and-Leap-Frogging-Strategy-Among-the-Rahman-Muda/99b42269db1918186103bb742118604608ec8593.
   Google Scholar
• Roblek, V., M. Meško, and A. Krapež. 2016. “A Complex View of Industry 4.0.” SAGE Open 6 (2): 2158244016653987. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin, F., P. Forget, S. Lamouri, and R. Pellerin. 2021. “Impact of Industry 4.0 on Decision-Making in an Operational Context.” Advances in Production Engineering & Management 16 (4): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2021.4.416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin, F., P. Forget, S. Lamouri, and R. Pellerin. 2022. “Enhancing the Decision-Making Process Through Industry 4.0 Technologies.” Sustainability 14 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rožanec, J. M., I. Novalija, P. Zajec, K. Kenda, H. Tavakoli Ghinani, S. Suh, E. Veliou, et al. 2022. “Human-centric Artificial Intelligence Architecture for Industry 5.0 Applications.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (0): 6847–6872. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2138611.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Zúñiga, E., C. Barrera Diaz, A. Navarro, A. Ng, T. Hirose, and H. Nomoto. 2022. Reconfiguration Assessment for Production Volume Changes Using Discrete-Event Simulation: A Large-Size Highly-Customized Product Case Study.
   Google Scholar
• Rüßmann, M., M. Lorenz, P. Gerbert, M. Waldner, J. Justus, P. Engel, and M. Harnisch. 2015. “Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries.” Boston Consult. Group 9: 54–89.
   Google Scholar
• Saihi, A., M. Awad, and M. Ben-Daya. 2021. “Quality 4.0: Leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies to improve quality management practices – a systematic review.” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 40 (2): 628–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2021-0305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., A. B. Bakker, and M. Salanova. 2003. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9. Utrecht (Netherlands): Educational and Psychological Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, W. 1971. Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed092145.
   Google Scholar
• Schuh, G., T. Potente, R. Varandani, C. Hausberg, and B. Fränken. 2014. “Collaboration Moves Productivity to the Next Level.” Procedia CIRP 17: 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.037.
   Google Scholar
• Simeone, A., R. Grant, W. Ye, and A. Caggiano. 2023. “A Human-Cyber-Physical System for Operator 5.0 Smart Risk Assessment.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 129 (5–6): 2763–2782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12481-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1960. The new Science of Management Decision. 1st ed., Vol. 3. New York : Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Sit, S. K. H., and C. K. M. Lee. 2023. “Design of a Digital Twin in Low-Volume, High-Mix Job Allocation and Scheduling for Achieving Mass Personalization.” Systems 11 (9), https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. 1995. “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (5): 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S., X. Zheng, B. Gong, J. García Paredes, and J. Ordieres-Meré. 2020. “Healthy Operator 4.0: A Human Cyber–Physical System Architecture for Smart Workplaces.” Sensors 20 (7): Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szajna, A., and M. Kostrzewski. 2022. “AR-AI Tools as a Response to High Employee Turnover and Shortages in Manufacturing During Regular, Pandemic, and War Times.” Sustainability 14 (11): Article 6729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W., Z.-H. Lai, M. C. Leu, Z. Yin, and R. Qin. 2019. “A Self-Aware and Active-Guiding Training & Assistant System for Worker-Centered Intelligent Manufacturing.” Manufacturing Letters 21: 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Ulutas, B. H., N. F. ��zkan, and R. Michalski. 2020. “Application of Hidden Markov Models to eye Tracking Data Analysis of Visual Quality Inspection Operations.” Central European Journal of Operations Research 28 (2): 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-019-00628-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uva, A. E., M. Gattullo, V. M. Manghisi, D. Spagnulo, G. L. Cascella, and M. Fiorentino. 2018. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Spatial Augmented Reality in Smart Manufacturing: A Solution for Manual Working Stations.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 94 (1): 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven, B., P. Van de Calseyde, R. Basten, and E. Demerouti. 2022. “Predictive Maintenance for Industry 5.0: Behavioural Inquiries from a Work System Perspective.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (22): 7846–7865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2154403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrier, G., and N. Bourgeois. 2016. Faut-il libérer l’entreprise?: Confiance, responsabilité et autonomie au travail. Malakoff (France): Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. D., E. L. Xu, and L. Li. 2018. “Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends.” International Journal of Production Research 56 (8): 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1981a. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy.” Knowledge 3 (1): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1981b. “The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (1): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zeisel, S. 2020. “A Framework and Use Cases for Big Data in Procurement.” International Journal of Procurement Management 13 (6): 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2020.111346.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, T., C. H. Glock, and E. H. Grosse. 2022. “Opportunities for Using Eye Tracking Technology in Manufacturing and Logistics: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 171: 108444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar