Incommensurability between paradigms, revolutions and common ground in the development of psychoanalysisFootnote^*

* Translated by Lasse Ullven.

References

• Abram, J. 2012. Annual Freud Memorial Lecture 2012 at the University of Essex. https://youtu.be/rOIDAmI99wo.
   Google Scholar
• Abram, J., ed. 2012. Donald Winnicott Today. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann de Litvan, M. ed. 2014. Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis – the Three-Level Model. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• André, J. A., P. Green, D. Fédida, C. Widlöcher, J. L. Chabert, and J.-L. Donnet. 1999. Les états limites. Nouveaux paradigm pour la psychanalyse? Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciagaluppi, M. 2012. Paradigms in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Barretta, J. P. 2016. “ A noção de paradigma(s) na psicanálise: Winnicott e Freud.” [The Notion of Paradigm(s) in Psychoanalysis: Winnicott and Freud.] Unpublished, cited with author’s permission.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 1989. “The Power of Theories: The Role of Paradigmatic Determinants in Psychoanalytic Understanding.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 70: 341–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2002. “The Need for True Controversies in Psychoanalysis: The Debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Río de la Plata.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 83 (4): 851–873. doi: 10.1516/P2WF-57VJ-25MY-3RM4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2014a. “The Assessment of Changes: Diagnostic Aspects.” In Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis – the Three-Level Model, edited by M. Altmann de Litvan, 263–278. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2014b. “The Three-Level Model (3-LM) for Observing Patient Transformations.” In Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis – the Three-Level Model, edited by M. Altmann de Litvan, 3–34. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2015. “What Kind of Discipline is Psychoanalysis?” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 96 (3): 731–754. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2017. “A Common Ground in Clinical Discussion Groups: Intersubjective Resonance and Implicit Operational Theories.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98: 1291–1309. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, S. 1971. Diary of My Analysis with Sigmund Freud. New York: Hawthorn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W. P., J. P. Fonagy, D. Jiménez, S. Scarfone, S. Varvin, and S. Zysman. 2013. “Towards a Better Use of Psychoanalytic Concepts: A Model Illustrated Using the Concept of Enactment.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 94 (3): 501–530. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1988. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. London: BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1893. Charcot. SE 3.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1900. The Interpretation of Dreams. SE 4, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1905. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE 7.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1912. “Totém et tabú.” In Sigmund Freud. Oeuvres completes (OCF.P), edited by Directeurs de la Publication André Bourguignon – Pierre Cotet Directeur Scientifiques Jean Laplanche, vol. 11, 189–385. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1914. On the History of the Psycho-analytic Movement. SE 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1923a. Two Encyclopedia Articles. SE 18.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1923b. The Ego and the Id. SE 19.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1933. New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. SE 22, 3–182.
   Google Scholar
• Fulgencio, L. 2005. “Freud’s Metapsychological Speculations.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86: 99–123. doi: 10.1516/TNY1-6YT7-V37T-16LD
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2005. “Winnicott en Transition, Entre Freud et Melanie Klein.” In Jouer avec Winnicott, edited by J. Green, 43–66. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. R., and S. A. Mitchell. 1983. Objet Relations and Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. P. 2006. “After Pluralism: Towards a new, Integrated Psychoanalytic Paradigm.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87: 1487–1507. doi: 10.1516/AEBF-QQC1-E0EH-68WN
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1974. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, edited by T. Khun, 293–319. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000. The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebrun, G. 1977. ‘L’idée d’épistemologie’. Manuscrito, n. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Loparic, Z. 2001. “Winnicott´s Paradigm Outlined.” Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental 5: 61–98. doi: 10.1590/1415-47142002001006
   Google Scholar
• Loparic, Z. 2006. “De Freud a Winnicott: Aspectos de uma mudança paradigmática.” [From Freud to Winnicott: Aspects of a Paradigm Change.] Revista de Filosofia e Psicanálise Natureza Humana 8 (Especial 1): 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Loparic, Z. 2012. “From Freud to Winnicott: Aspects of a Paradigm Change.” In Donald Winnicott Today, edited by J. Abram. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loparic, Zeljko. 2018. “Winnicott's Paradigm Shift in Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice.” In Donald W. Winnicott and the History of the Present: Understanding the Man and his Work, edited by A. Joyce, 132–141. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Lubimoff, A. 1894. Le Professeur Charcot: Étude Scientifique et Biologique. Saint Petersburg: Typographie A. S. Souvorine.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J. 1995. “Au-delà des sectes psychanalytiques: en quête d'un nouveau paradigme.” In Éros aux mille et un visages, edited by J. McDougall, 289–302. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Mezan, R. 1990. “Existem paradigmas na psicanálise?” [Paradigms Exist in Psychoanalysis?] Percurso 4: 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mezan, R. 2002. “Sobre a epistemologia da psicanálise.” [About Epistemology in Psychoanalysis.] In Interfaces da psicanálise, edited by R. Mezan. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Mezan, R. 2006. “Paradigmas em psicanálise.” [Paradigms in Psychoanalysis.] Revista de Filosofia e Psicanálsie Natureza Humana, Livro de Conferências do I Congresso Internacional de Filosofia da Psicanálise 8 (especial 1): 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. 1988. Winnicott. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pontalis, J. B. 2001. “C’étair un vrai comédien.” Libération. Lacan, y es-tu? 13th April 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1972. Conjectures et réfutations. La croissance du savoir scientifique. Paris: Payot, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. 1987. A metáfora freudiana: Para uma mudança paradigmática na psicanálise [A Freudian Metaphor: For a Paradigm Change in Psychoanalysis]. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. 1986. “Psychoanalysis and Science: Friends or Relations?” In The Collect Works of D. W. Winnicott, edited by Lesley Caldwell and Henry Taylor Robson, Vol: 6, item 9, 217–222. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. 2017. The Collect Works of D. W. Winnicott , 12 Vols. Cladwell Lesley and Helen Taylor Robinson, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar