Enactment: A necessary conceptual review

References

• Altmann de Litvan, M., ed. 2014. Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalyses – the Three-Level Model. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, V. M. 2005. “Affect and Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86 (3): 677–697. doi: 10.1516/YHJK-63WN-QX6X-KYP2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbiser, S. 2003a. “A Brief History of Psychoanalysis in Argentina.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51 (Supplement): 323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbiser, S. 2003b. “Psicoanálisis en Argentina [Psychoanalysis in Argentina].” Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis [Uruguayan Journal of Psychoanalysis] 97: 159–181. http://www.apuruguay.org/revista_pdf/rup97/rup97-arbiser.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [(1986). Problemas de la póetica de Dostoievski. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica].
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1989. Teoría y estética de la novela [Theory and Aesthetics of the Novel]. Madrid: Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., and W. Baranger. 2008. “The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89: 795–826. [(1969). Problemas del campo psicoanalítico. 2nd ed. Buenos Aires: Kargieman]. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, A. 1998. “Thick-and Thin-Skinned Organisations and Enactment in Borderline and Narcissistic Disorders.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79 (1): 13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2015. “What Kind of Discipline is Psychoanalysis?” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 96 (3): 731–754. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeker, H., A. Richter, H. Himmighoffen, J. Ernst, L. Bohleber, E. Hofmann, et al. 2014. “Essentials of Psychoanalytic Process and Change: How Can We Investigate the Neural Effects of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Individualized Neuro-Imaging?” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 7–24. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. 1982. “Acting Out: A Reconsideration of the Concept.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 63 (1): 39–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohleber, W., P. Fonagy, J. P. Jiménez, D. Scarfone, S. Varvin, and S. Zysman. 2013. “Towards a Better Use of Psychoanalytic Concepts: A Model Illustrated Using the Concept of Enactment.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 94 (3): 501–530. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borensztejn, C. L. 2009. “El enactment como concepto clínico convergente de teorías divergentes [Enactment as a Clinical Concept Bringing Together Divergent Theories].” Revista de Psicoanálisis 66 (1): 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. 2001. “Pathways of Emotional Communication.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 21 (1): 40–70. doi:10.1080/07351692109348923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. 2005. “From Bastion to Enactment: The ‘Non-Dream’ in the Theatre of Analysis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86 (3): 699–719. doi:10.1516/rr33-a8fh-v4rb-cdxj.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. 2012. “What Happens Before and After Acute Enactments? An Exercise in Clinical Validation and the Broadening of Hypotheses.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93 (1): 53–80. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00506.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. 2017. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Chused, J. F. 1991. “The Evocative Power of Enactments.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39 (3): 615–640. doi:10.1177/000306519103900302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chused, J. F. 1998. “The Evocative Power of Enactments.” In Enactment: Toward a New Approach to the Therapeutic Relationship, edited by S. J. Ellman, and M. Moskowitz, 93–109. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Corbella, V. 2017. Enactment: A Necessary Conceptual Review. https://redbus.usal.edu.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=164188.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [(1980). Mil mesetas: capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pretextos].
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, A. U. 2005. “Conceptual Research.” In Textbook of Psychoanalysis, edited by E. S. Person, A. M. Cooper, and G. O. Gabbard, 361–372. https://www.scribd.com/document/167429885/Textbook-of-Psychoanalysis.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen, H. 1986. Los Fundamentos De La Técnica Psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. 1994. “Projective Identification in Phantasy and Enactment.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 14 (3): 423–440. doi:10.1080/07351699409533995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1905. Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. SE 7.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1920. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. SE 18.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O. 1995. “Countertransference: The Emerging Common Ground.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 76: 475–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. 2011. Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. New York, NY: HarperCollins. https://www.scribd.com/read/163581543/Who-s-in-Charge-Free-Will-and-the-Science-of-the-Brain.
   Google Scholar
• Gálvez, M. J. 2001. Acting Out y Enactment: ¿Conceptos o Slogans? [Acting Out and Enactment: Concepts or Slogans?] Paper presented at the Symposium of the Psychoanalytic Association of Buenos Aires, November 2001, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. 2002. “Enactment as Understanding and as Misunderstanding.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 50 (3): 869–883. doi:10.1177/00030651020500030701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2005a. Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm for Clinical Thinking. London: Free Association Books. [(2002). El pensamiento clínico. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu].
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2005b. Key Ideas for a Contemporary Psychoanalysis: Misrecognition and Recognition of the Unconscious. Brunner-Routledge. [(2003). Ideas directrices para un psicoanálisis contemporáneo: Desconocimiento y reconocimiento del inconsciente. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu].
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, L. 1956. “Sobre algunos problemas de técnica psicoanalítica determinadas por la identificación y la contraidentificacion proyectiva [On Some Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique Determined by Projective Identification and Projective Counteridentification].” Revista de Psicoanálisis 13 (4): 507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. 1950. “On Counter-Transference.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 31: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. 1998. “The Concept of Enactment and Theoretical Convergence.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 67 (1): 78–101. doi: 10.1080/00332828.1998.12006032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M. 2009. Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others. London, UK: Picador. [(2009). Las neuronas espejo: Empatía, neuropolítica, autismo, imitación o de cómo entendemos a los otros. Buenos Aires: Katz].
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G. 2008. “Enactment Controversies: A Critical Review of Current Debates.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89 (1): 19–38. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2007.00003.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. 1986. “On Countertransference Enactments.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 34 (2): 289–307. doi:10.1177/000306518603400203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. 2013a. The Possible Profession: The Analytic Process of Change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. 2013b. “Nonverbal Cues in Transference-Countertransference Interactions: Reflection on Their Role in the Analytic Process.” In Transference and Countertransference Today, edited by R. Oelsner. Routledge. https://play.google.com/books/reader?printsec=frontcover&output=reader&id=SiJWTaiI56QC&pg=GBS.PT11.
   Google Scholar
• Johan, M. 1992. “Panel Report: Enactments in Psychoanalysis.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 40: 827–841. doi: 10.1177/000306519204000307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. 1985. “Transference: The Total Situation.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 66 (4): 447–454.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. 1989. “Transference: The Total Situation.” In Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change, edited by M. Feldman, and E. Bott Spillius, 156–167. London: Routledge. [(1989). Transferencia: La situación total. In Equilibrio psíquico y cambio psíquico, edited by M. Feldman, and E. Bott Spillius, 217–232. Madrid: Julián Yebenes].
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. 1999. From Acting Out to Enactment. Paper presented at the Day of Commemoration of Joseph Sandler, March 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. 2003. Ethics and Enactment. Paper presented at the Congress of the European Psychoanalytical Federation, Sorrento, Italy, July 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, G. 2014. The Play Within the Play: The Enacted Dimension of Psychoanalytic Process. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. 2005. “The Influence of Joseph Sandler’s Work on Contemporary Psychoanalysis.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 25 (2): 173–183. doi:10.1080/07351692509349126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 1957. Envy and Gratitude: A Study of Unconscious Sources. Oxford, England: Basic Books. [(1975). Envidia y gratitud [Envy and gratitude]. In Obras completas: Melanie Klein [Complete works: Melanie Klein], Vol. 3, 181–240. Buenos Aires: Paidós].
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, I. 2002. “‘Enactment’ in the Lives and Treatment of Holocaust Survivors’ Offspring.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 71 (2): 251–272. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00013.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakov, H. 2010. Estudio sobre el concepto de agieren [Study on the Concept of Agieren]. Paper presented at the Congress of the Psychoanalytic Federation of Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia, September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J., and J. B. Pontalis. 1973. The Language of Psychoanalysis. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. The International Psycho-Analytical Library 94:1–497. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J., and J. B. Pontalis. 1994. Diccionario de psicoanálisis [Dictionary of Psychoanalysis]. 2nd ed. Barcelona: Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., and T. Fischmann. 2006. “What is Conceptual Research in Psychoanalysis?” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87 (5): 1355–1386. doi:10.1516/73MU-E53N-D1EE-1Q8L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldavsky, D. 2018. “Investigación empírica del enactment: operacionalización, instrumentos, ejemplos [Empirical Research on Enactment: Operationalisation, Instruments, Examples].” In Psicoanálisis latinoamericano contemporáneo [Contemporary Latin American Psychoanalysis], edited by F. M. Gómez, and J. M. Tauszik, 1083–1105. Buenos Aires: APA Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Mancia, M. 2006. “Implicit Memory and Early Unrepressed Unconscious: Their Role in the Therapeutic Process (How the Neurosciences Can Contribute to Psychoanalysis).” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87 (1): 83–103. doi:10.1516/39M7-H9CE-5LQX-YEGY.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. 1991. “Clinical and Theoretical Aspects of Enactment.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39: 595–614. doi: 10.1177/000306519103900301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. 1998. “Clinical and Theoretical Aspects of Enactment.” In Enactment: Toward a New Approach to the Therapeutic, edited by S. J. Ellman, and M. Moskowitz, 77–89. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, E. 2000. A propósito del concepto de enactment [On the Concept of Enactment]. http://www.aperturas.org/articulos.php?id=0000111&a=A-proposito-del-concepto-de-enactment.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, P. 2012. “Memoria implícita y angustias tempranas [Implicit Memory and Early Anxieties].” Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis [Uruguayan Journal of Psychoanalysis] 114: 83–92. http://www.apuruguay.org/apurevista/2010/16887247201211407.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. 1982. Projective Identification and Psychotherapeutic Technique. London: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, C. A. 2007. “Del ‘agieren’ al ‘enactment’, un siglo de cambios y avances [From ‘Agieren’ to ‘Enactment’, a Century of Changes and Advancement].” Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid [Madrid Journal of Psychoanalysis] 50: 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Perelberg, R. J. 2003. “Panel on ‘Acting Out and/or Enactment’.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84 (1): 151–155. doi:10.1516/9g6k-rnrm-b5mx-7gmk.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. 1953. “A Contribution to the Problem of Counter-Transference.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 34 (4): 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. 1957. “The Meanings and Uses of Countertransference.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 26: 303–357. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1957.11926061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. 1988. Transference and Countertransference. The International Psycho-Analytical Library 73:1–196. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. [Racker H (1973). Estudios sobre técnica psicoanalítica [Studies on psychoanalytic technique]. 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Paidós].
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. 1997. “Reactions to ‘Observing-Participation, Mutual Enactment, and the New Classical Models’ by Irwin Hirsch, Ph.D.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis 33 (2): 279–284. doi:10.1080/00107530.1997.10746987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. 1992. “On Enactment.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 40 (4): 1228–1229. doi:10.1177/000306519204000414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roughton, R. 1993. “Useful Aspects of Acting Out: Repetition, Enactment and Actualization.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41 (2): 443–472. doi:10.1177/000306519304100206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. 1976. “Countertransference and Role-Responsiveness.” International Review of Psycho-analysis 3: 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., C. Dare, and A. Holder. 1992. The Patient and the Analyst: The Basis of the Psychoanalytic Process. London: Karnac. [(1993). El analista y el paciente. Las bases del proceso psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Paidós].
   Google Scholar
• Sapisochin, G. 2007. “Variaciones post-freudianas de agieren: Sobre la escucha de lo puesto en acto [Post-Freudian Variations on Agieren: On Listening to the Enacted].” Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid [Madrid Journal of Psychoanalysis] 50: 73–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sapisochin, G. 2013. “Seconds Thoughts on Agieren: Listening to the Enacted.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 94 (5): 967–991. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapisochin, G. 2014. “Dialogando con D.W. Winnicott. Reflexiones sobre la escucha del enactment [A Dialogue with DW Winnicott: Reflections on Listening to Enactment].” Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid [Madrid Journal of Psychoanalysis] 71: 257–280.
   Google Scholar
• Smeke Cassorla, R. M. 2001. “Acute Enactment as a ‘Resource’ in Disclosing a Collusion Between the Analytical Dyad.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 82 (6): 1155–1170. doi:10.1516/k79g-fdw3-jfq3-5fcn.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. 2000. “Containment, Enactment and Communication.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81 (2): 245–255. doi: 10.1516/0020757001599735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. 2006. “Interpretative Enactment and the Analytic Setting.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87 (2): 315–328. doi:10.1516/f283-h4rj-x1dt-gf35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterba, R. 2013. The First Dictionary of Psychoanalysis: A Gift for Sigmund Freud’s 80th Birthday. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Strenger, C. 1991. Between Hermeneutics and Science: An Essay on the Epistemology of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szeczödy, I. 2001. “On Steineŕs ‘Containment, Enactment and Communication’.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 82 (1): 171–175. doi:10.1516/JH0J-B090-2JBN-JRH7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. 2013. “Misconception, Enactments and Interpretation.” In Transference and Countertransference Today, edited by R. Oelsner. https://play.google.com/books/reader?printsec=frontcover&output=reader&id=SiJWTaiI56QC&pg=GBS.PT11.
   Google Scholar
• Wimsatt, W. 1994. “The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1): 207–274.
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, A., and H. D. Zachrisson. 2005. “Validation of Psychoanalytic Theories: Towards a Conceptualization of References.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86 (5): 1373–1371. doi:10.1516/FVGK-FJN3-V3D1-JRF8 doi: 10.1516/AY9F-55RV-QGF7-E9WB
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar