Psychoanalytic identity in vivo: Permanence and change

References

• Altmann de Litvan, M. ed. 2014. Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Azcona, M., F. Muller, C. Labaronnie, J. Zurita, M. Lardizábal, and D. Tolini. 2023. “Agreements and Differences between Psychoanalysts with Regard to Changes Observed during a Treatment. A Quantitative Exploration using the Three- Level Model (3-LM).” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 104 (4): 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2023.2218928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., and W. Baranger. 2008. “The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89 (4): 795–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00074.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., W. Baranger, and J. M. Mom. 1983. “Process and non-Process in Analytic Work.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 64: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 1989. “The Role of Paradigmatic Determinants in Psychoanalytic Understanding.” Int.J.Psychoanal 70: 341–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 1992. “On Pluralism in Psychoanalysis.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 12 (4): 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699209533910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2001. “Psychoanalytic Goals: New and Old Paradoxes.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 70 (1): 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2001.tb00590.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2002. “The Need for True Controversies in Psychoanalysis: The Debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 83 (4): 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1516/P2WF-57VJ-25MY-3RM4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2003. “What Kind of Evidence Makes the Analyst Change his/her Theoretical and Technical Ideas?” In Pluralism and Unity? Methods of Research in Psychoanalysis, edited by En M. Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber, A. U. Dreher, and J. Canestri, 125–136. London: The International Psichoanalytical Asociation.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2005. “What After Pluralism? Ulysses Still on the Road.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 25 (5): 654. Rpt n:). J. Salberg, (Ed.), (2022) Psychoanalytic Credos. Personal and Professional Journeys of Psychoanalysts (pp. 31-40). London.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2513/s07351690pi1601_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2008. “Letter from Uruguay.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 89 (2): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00024.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2014. “The Three-Level Model (3-LM) for Observing Patient Transformations.” In Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis – The Three-Level Model, edited by M. Altmann de Litvan, 3–34. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2015. “What Kind of Discipline is Psychoanalysis?” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 96 (3): 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2017. “A Common Ground in Clinical Discussion Groups: Intersubjective Resonance and Implicit Operational Theories.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98 (5): 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., and B. de León de Bernardi. 2012. “The Concepts of Vinculo and Dialectical Spiral: A Bridge Between Intra-and Intersubjectivity.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 81 (3): 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2012.tb00507.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., and B. de León de Bernardi. 2013. “Does our Self-Analysis Take Into Consideration our Assumptions?” In Self-Analysis, edited by James W. Barron, 29–46. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., and L. Pérez Suquilvide with discussion by Charles Hanly. 2021. “Assessing Strengths and Limitations of Clinical Evidence in a Psychoanalytic Clinical Material.” In Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis. Transformations and Interpretations, the Three-Level Model, edited by M. A. Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan, and R. Bernardi, 281–305. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1973. “Criterios de curación y objetivos del psicoanálisis.” Revista de Psicoanálisis v. XXX (n. 2): 317–350.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 2012. “Theory and Practice in Psychoanalysis: Psychonalytic Praxis.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93 (4): 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00593.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de León de Bernardi, Beatriz. 2023. “Field Theory: The Transference-Countertransference Relationship and Second Look.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 104 (4): 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2023.2230772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 2012. “Triangulation 2.0.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (2): 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. A., M. Altmann, and R. Bernardi. 2021. Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis:Transformations and Interventions, The Three Level Model. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2005. “The Illusion of Common Ground and Mythical Pluralism.” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 86 (Pt 3): 627–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. 1939. “Criteria for Interpretation.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 20: 148–160.
   Google Scholar
• Leichsenring, F., A. Abbass, N. Heim, J. R. Keefe, S. Kisely, P. Luyten, … C. Steinert. 2023. “The Status of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy as an Empirically Supported Treatment for Common Mental Disorders–an Umbrella Review Based on Updated Criteria.” World Psychiatry 22 (2): 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring, F., C. Steinert, S. Rabung, and J. P. Ioannidis. 2022. “The Efficacy of Psychotherapies and Pharmacotherapies for Mental Disorders in Adults: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Recent Meta-Analyses.” World Psychiatry 21 (1): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingiardi, V., and N. McWilliams, eds. 2017. Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual: PDM-2. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ollinheimo, A., and K. Hakkarainen. 2023. “Critical Thinking as Cooperation and its Relation to Mental Health and Social Welfare.” New Ideas in Psychology 68: 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPD Task Force, ed. 2008. Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis OPD-2. Manual of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, B., and F. Falkenström. 2021. “What Research Evidence is Valid for Psychotherapy Research?” Frontiers in Psychiatry 11: 625380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.625380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichon Rivière, E. 2017. “The Link and the Theory of the Three Ds (Depositant, Depositary, and Deposited): Role and Status.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98 (1): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, G. M., T. J. Rebello, K. M. Pike, M. E. Medina-Mora, O. Gureje, M. Zhao, Y. Dai, et al. 2015. “WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network for Mental Health.” The Lancet Psychiatry 2 (5): 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00183-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reik, T. 1948. Listening with the Third ear: The Inner Experience of a Psychoanalyst. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. 2003. “Standards and Standardization.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51 (Suppl): 43–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodríguez Quiroga, A., S. Aufenacker, A. Crawley, S. Waldron, L. Borensztein, C. Botero, S. Juan, and L. Bongiardino. 2023. “A Multicentre Study: Comparison of 3-LM Group Output and Therapeutic Outcome Measures. Adding to the Trustworthiness of the 3-LM? Part 2.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 104 (1): 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2022.2129058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Quiroga de Pereira, A., L. Borensztein, V. Corbella, and J. C. Marengo. 2018. “The Lara Case: A Group Analysis of Initial Psychoanalytic Interviews Using Systematic Clinical Observation and Empirical Tools.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 99 (6): 1327–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2018.1533374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. 1983. “Reflections on Some Relations Between Psychoanalytic Concepts and Psychoanalytic Practice.” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 64: 35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, K. 2009. “Underdetermination of Scientific Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), edited by N. Zalta and U. Nodelman.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. 1988. “One Psychoanalysis or Many?” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 69: 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. 2005. “Psychoanalytic Controversies: Will Psychoanalytic Pluralism be an Enduring State of our Discipline?” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86 (3): 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1516/VJHB-7R8A-162R-B5WN.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2021. Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneve: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar