Methodological Problems of Quantitative Comparative Social Research

REFERENCES

• Bachleitner, Reinhard, Martin Weichbold, Wolfgang Aschauer, and Markus Pausch. 2014. Methodologie und Methodik interkultureller Umfrageforschung. Zur Mehrdimensionalität der funktionalen Äquivalenz [Methodology and methods of cross cultural survey research. The multi-dimensionality of functional equivalence]. Berlin: Springer-VS.
   Google Scholar
• Boatcă, Manuela. 2015. Global Inequalities beyond Occidentalism. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. 1982 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Max with Anja Eder. 2015. Ethnic Stratification and Economic Inequality around the World: The End of Exploitation and Exclusion? Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Max, Roger Jowell, and Tom W. Smith. 2009. The International Social Survey Program: Charting the Globe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Max, Bogdan Mach, and Heinrich Zwicky. 1995. “Egalitarismus und Antiegalitarismus zwischen gesellschaftlichen Interessen und kulturellen Leitbildern [Egalitarian and anti-egalitarian attitudes between societal interests and cultural views].” Pp. 221–264 in Soziale Ungleichheit und soziale Gerechtigkeit [Social Inequality and Justice], edited by Hans-Peter Mueller and Bernd Wegener. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Max, Anja Eder, and Bernadette Müller. 2015. “Drei Wege zur Zähmung des Kapitalismus: Die Wahrnehmung und Bewertung sozialer Ungleichheit in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz [Three ways of taming capitalism: Perceptions and attitudes toward social inequality in Austria, Germany and Switzerland].” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 40:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Max, and Markus Hadler. 2004. “Happiness as an Expression of Freedom and Self-Determination: A Comparative Multilevel Analysis.” Pp. 207–231 in Challenges of Quality of Life in the Contemporary World, edited by Wolfgang Glatzer Susanne, von Below, and Matthias Stoffregen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, Janet A. 2003. “Questionnaire Translation.” Pp. 35–56 in Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, edited by Janet Harkness Fons Van de Vijver and Peter Mohler. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, Janet A. 2007. “Improving the Comparability of Translations.” Pp. 79–95 in Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, edited by Roger Jowell, Caroline Roberts, Rory Fitzgerald, and Eva Gillian Eva. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, Janet A. 2008. “Comparative Survey Research: Goals and Challenges.” Pp. 56–77 in International Handbook of Survey Methodology, edited by Edith D. de Leeuw, Joop Hox, and Don Dillman. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Herskovits, Melville J. 1972. Cultural Relativism. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Höllinger, Franz, Jürgen Fleiß, and Helmut Kuzmics. 2012. “National Pride, Patriotism and Nationalism: Methodological Reflections and Empirical Analyses.” Pp. 45–70 in Crossing Borders, Shifting Boundaries, edited by Franz Höllinger and Markus Hadler. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 2000. “Globalization and Postmodern Values.” Washington Quarterly 23(1):215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Timothy P. 1998. “Approaches to Equivalence in Cross-Cultural and Cross-National Survey Research.” ZUMA-Nachrichten spezial 3:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Melvin L. ed. 1989. Cross-National Research in Sociology. American Sociological Association Presidential Series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John. S. 1973 [1843]. A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Peter. 2012. Resilience and the City: Change, (Dis)order and Disaster. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25:1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelser, Neil. 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sniders, Tom, and Roel Boskers. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd ed.. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vijver, Fons van de, and Norbert K. Tanzer. 2004. “Bias and Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Assessment: An Overview.” European Review of Applied Psychology 54(2):119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. 1969. “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science Policy.” Pp. 49–112 in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited and translated by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, with a foreword by Edward A. Shils. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar