Social Association and Social Inequality in Poland, 1988–2013

REFERENCES

• Agresti, Alan. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Joseph, and M. Hamit Fisek. 2006. “Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 111:1038–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M., and Joseph E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centola, Damon. 2015. “The Social Origins of Network and Diffusion.” American Journal of Sociology 120:1295–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles Camille Zubrinsky. 2000. “Neighborhood Racial-Composition Preferences: Evidence from a Multiethnic Metropolis.” Social Problems 47:379–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, James S. 1964. An Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, Philip B. 1989. Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domański, Henryk. 2007. “Changes in Marital Homogamy and Mate Selection.” Pp. 107–24 in Continuity and Change in Social Life: Structural and Psychological Adjustment in Poland, edited by Kazimierz M. Słomczyński, and Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Domański, Henryk, and Dariusz Przybysz. 2007a. Homogamia Małżeńska a Hierarchie Społeczne [Marital Homogamy and Social Hierarchies]. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Domański, Henryk, and Dariusz Przybysz. 2007b. “Educational Homogamy in 22 European Countries.” European Societies 9(4): 495–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domański, Henryk, and Dariusz Przybysz. 2009. “Bariery Zawierania Małżeństw W Polsce W Latach 1977–2008” [“Barriers to Marriage in Poland, 1977 – 2007”]. Studia Socjologiczne 192:53–88.
   Google Scholar
• Domański, Henryk, and Dariusz Przybysz. 2012. “Friendship Patterns and Social Inequality.” International Journal of Sociology 42:31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Otis D., and Beverly Duncan. 1955. “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes.” American Sociological Review 20:210–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fararo, Thomas J. 1989. The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, Scott, and Bernard Grofman. 2009. “Homophily and the Focused Organization of Ties.” Pp. 521–543 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by Peter Hedström, and Peter Bearman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Leo A. 2007. “Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity: An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 33:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, Michael. 1983. Mobility Tables. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, Robert R. 1983. “Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice.” American Journal of Sociology 89:651–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpiński, Zbigniew, and John Skvoretz. 2015. “Rejected by the ‘Other’: Integrating Theory with Method in the Study of Intergroup Association.” Sociological Theory 33:20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katrňák, Tomáš, Petr Fučík, and Ruud Luijkx. 2012. “The Relationship between Educational Homogamy and Educational Mobility in 29 European Countries.” International Sociology 27:551–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, David, and Peter J. Burke. 1982. Log-Linear Models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mare, Robert D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, Peter V. 1988. “Homogeneity in Confiding Relations.” Social Networks 10:57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson J. Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:414–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2006. “Status Construction Theory.” Pp. 301–23 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by Peter J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. “Inequality, Status, and the Construction of Status Beliefs.” Pp. 323–40 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 79:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and James W. Balkwell. 1997. “Group Processes and the Diffusion of Status Beliefs.” Social Psychology Quarterly 60:14–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, David R. 2012. “Homophily Through Nonreciprocity: Results of an Experiment.” Social Forces 90:1271–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Christine R., and Robert D. Mare. 2005. “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage From 1940 to 2003.” Demography 42:621–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, John. 1983. “Salience, Heterogeneity, and Consolidation of Parameters: Civilizing Blau’s Primitive Theory.” American Sociological Review 48:370–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, John. 1991. “Theoretical and Methodological Models of Networks and Relations.” Social Networks 13:275–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, John. 2013. “Diversity, Integration, and Social Ties: Attraction Versus Repulsion as Drivers of Intra- and Intergroup Relations.” American Journal of Sociology 119:486–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, John. 2016. “All for One and One for All: Theoretical Models, Sociological Theory, and Mathematical Sociology.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 40(2):71–79. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2016.1147446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomczynski, Kazimierz M. ed. 2000. Social Patterns of Being Political: The Initial Phase of Post-Communist Transition in Poland. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Slomczynski, Kazimierz M. ed. 2002. Social Structure: Changes and Linkages. The Advanced Phase of the Post-Communist Transition in Poland. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Krystyna Janicka. 2008. “Polarized Social-Class Structure: On the Matthew Effect and Increasing Inequality.” Polish Sociological Review 4:341–57.
   Google Scholar
• Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., Krystyna Janicka, Goldie Shabad, and Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2007. “Changes in Class Structure in Poland, 1988–2003: Crystallization of the Winners–Losers’ Divide.” Pp. 24–46 in Continuity and Change in Social Life: Structural and Psychological Adjustment in Poland, edited by Kazimierz M. Słomczyński, and Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt eds. 2007. Continuity and Change in Social Life: Structural and Psychological Adjustment in Poland. Warsaw: IFiS.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jeffrey A., Miller McPherson, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 2014. “Social Distance in the United States: Sex, Race, Religion, Age, and Education Homophily among Confidants, 1985 to 2004.” American Sociological Review 79:432–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, Jeroen. 2003. “Social Closure Among the Higher Educated:Trends in Educational Homogamy in 55 Countries.” Social Science Research 32:251–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, Jeroen, Wout Ultee, and Jan Lammers. 1998. “Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables.” American Sociological Review 63:264–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tootell, Geoffrey, Alison J. Bianchi, and Paul T. Munroe. 2002. “Formalization and Inference.” Pp. 33–55 in The Growth of Social Knowledge: Theory, Simulation, and Empirical Research in Group Processes, edited by Jacek Szmatka Michael Lovaglia, and Kinga Wysieńska. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ultee, Wout C., and Ruud Luijkx. 1990. “Educational Heterogamy and Father–to–son Occupational Mobility in 23 Industrial Nations: General Societal Openness or Compensatory Strategies of Reproduction?” European Sociological Review 6:155–149.
   Google Scholar