Government Redistribution and Public Opinion: A Matter of Contention or Consensus?

REFERENCES

• Andreß, Hans‐Jürgen, and Thorsten Heien. 2001. “Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States.” European Sociological Review 17(4):337–56. doi: 10.1093/esr/17.4.337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechert, Insa, and Jonas Edlund. 2015. “Observing Unexpected Patterns in Cross-National Research: Blame Data, Theory, or Both? Attitudes toward Redistributive Taxation in Thirty-Three Countries.” International Journal of Sociology 45(4):327–47. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2015.1098272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellin, Eva. 2000. “Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late-Developing Countries.” World Politics 52(02):175–205. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100002598.
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, and Philipp Rehm. 2016. “Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 49(4):529–63. doi: 10.1177/0010414015617961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, David, and Amie Bostic. 2015. “Paradoxes of Social Policy: Welfare Transfers, Relative Poverty, and Redistribution Preferences.” American Sociological Review 80(2):268–98. doi: 10.1177/0003122415573049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Clem, and Stefan Svallfors. 2010. “Why Does Class Matter? Policy Attitudes, Mechanisms, and the Case of the Nordic Countries.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28(2):199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusack, Thomas, Torben Iversen, and Philipp Rehm. 2006. “Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3):365–89. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grj022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallinger, Ursula. 2010. “Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-National Differences?” Journal of European Social Policy 20(4):333–49. doi: 10.1177/0958928710374373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, Robert R. Kaufman, and James D. Long. 2013. “Income, Occupation, and Preferences for Redistribution in the Developing World.” Studies in Comparative International Development 48(2):113–40. doi: 10.1007/s12116-013-9129-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group. 2018. “International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government V - ISSP 2016.” Database. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6900 Data file Version 2.0.0. Retrieved March 16, 2018 (http://doi:10.4232/1.13052).
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2015. “Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 48(13):1781–813. doi: 10.1177/0010414015592643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Ee-Hwan. 2002. “Inequality in Labor Market and Inequality within Organizations: A Study of Wage Inequality in the 1990s in Korea.” Korean Journal of Sociology 36(6):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Ee-Hwan. 2006. “Industrial Relations and Wage Inequalities in East Asia.” Korean Journal of Sociology 40(2):118–48.
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson, Ira, and Barry R. Weingast, eds. 2005. Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Huck-Ju. 1997. “Beyond European Welfare Regimes: Comparative Perspectives on East Asian Welfare Systems.” Journal of Social Policy 26(4):467–84. doi: 10.1017/S004727949700514X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIS. 2018. “Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database.” Database. LIS, Luxembourg. Retrieved May 1, 2018 (http://www.lisdatacenter.org).
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45(4):595–628. doi: 10.2307/2950710.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94(02):251–67. doi: 10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piven, Frances F., and Richard A. Cloward. 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage. doi: 10.1086/ahr/83.3.841.
   Google Scholar
• Rehm, Philipp. 2011. “Social Policy by Popular Demand.” World Politics 63(02):271–99. doi: 10.1017/S0043887111000037.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, David. 2005. “Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties.” American Political Science Review 99(1):61–74. doi: 10.1017/S000305540505149X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, David. 2018. “Food Comes First, Then Morals: Redistribution Preferences, Parochial Altruism, and Immigration in Western Europe.” The Journal of Politics 80(1):225–39. doi: 10.1086/694201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, David, and Jonas Pontusson. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 52(03):350–83. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100016579.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. Eric. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of American Democracy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103(02):147–74. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090194.
   Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 52(1):48–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick. 2010. “Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis.” Political Behavior 32(2):285–301. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Ho-Keun. 1994. “Working-Class Politics in Reform Democracy in South Korea.” Korea Journal of Population and Development 23(2):157–77.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmueller, D., P. Scheepers, S. Rossteutscher, and E. de Jong. 2012. “Support for Redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the Role of Religion.” European Sociological Review 28(4):482–97. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13(3):283–304. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2018. “Statistics for Social Protection and Well-being: Income Distribution and Poverty Dataset.” Database. OECD, Paris. Retrieved May 1, 2018 (https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx/r=631499).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Jae-Jin. 2013. “Parochial Welfare Politics and the Small Welfare State in South Korea.” Comparative Politics 45(4):457–75. doi: 10.5129/001041513X13815259182938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar