It’s the Moral Economy, Stupid! Anger Toward Economic Inequality and Populist Voting

References

• Abts, K., E. Dalle Mulle, S. Kessel, and E. Michel. 2021. “The Welfare Agenda of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe: Combining Welfare Chauvinism, Producerism and Populism*.” Swiss Political Science Review 27(1):21–40. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. S. 1963. “Towards an Understanding of Inequity.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 67:422–36. doi: 10.1037/h0040968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47(9):1324–53. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2016. “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective.” Political Studies 64(1_suppl):88–104. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E., E. G. Rau, and S. Stokes. 2020. “Beyond Opportunity Costs: Campaign Messages, Anger and Turnout among the Unemployed.” British Journal of Political Science 50(4):1325–39. doi: 10.1017/S0007123418000248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., M. Rooduijn, and G. Schumacher. 2016. “The Psychological Roots of Populist Voting: Evidence from the United States, The Netherlands and Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 55(2):302–20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, A. J. 2016. “Are Group Cues Necessary? How Anger Makes Ethnocentrism among Whites a Stronger Predictor of Racial and Immigration Policy Opinions.” Political Behavior 38 (3):635–57. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9330-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R. R. 2009. “Populists, Outsiders and anti-Establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15(1):29–48. doi: 10.1177/1354068808097890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, H.-G. 2002. “Conditions Favouring the Success and Failure of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Contemporary Democracies.” Pp. 197–213 in Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Mény Y. and Surel Y. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9781403920072_11.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, D. 2017. “Towards a Renewal of the Niche Party Concept: Parties, Market Shares and Condensed Offers.” Party Politics 23(3):220–35. doi: 10.1177/1354068815588259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B. 2017. “Ethno-Nationalist Populism and the Mobilization of Collective Resentment.” The British Journal of Sociology 68(S1):S181–S213. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., C. Schemer, N. Corbu, M. Hameleers, I. Andreadis, A. Schulz, D. Schmuck, C. Reinemann, and N. Fawzi. 2020. “The Effects of Populism as a Social Identity Frame on Persuasion and Mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-Country Experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 59(1):3–24. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer, B. T., and M. I. Vail. 2011. “Economic Insecurity, the Social Market Economy, and Support for the German Left.” West European Politics 34(4):683–705. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.572387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carella, L., and R. Ford. 2020. “The Status Stratification of Radical Right Support: Reconsidering the Occupational Profile of UKIP’s Electorate.” Electoral Studies 67:102214. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazel, L., and V. Dain. 2021. “Left-Wing Populism and Nationalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Patriotic Narratives of Podemos and France insoumise.” Journal for the Study of Radicalism 15(2):73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chueri, J. 2022. “An Emerging Populist Welfare Paradigm? How Populist Radical Right-Wing Parties Are Reshaping the Welfare State.” Scandinavian Political Studies 45(4):383–409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbu, N., L. Bos, C. Schemer, et al. 2019. Cognitive Responses to Populist Communication: The Impact of Populist Message Elements on Blame Attribution and Stereotyping. Pp. 183–206 in: Communicating Populism: Comparing Actor Perceptions, Media Coverage, and Effects on Citizens in Europe, edited by Reinemann C., Stanyer J., Aalberg T., et al. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429402067-10.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. 1st ed. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. 2015. “Preference for Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties among Exclusive-Nationalists and Authoritarians.” Party Politics 21(3):367–80. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R. 2004. Contesting Capitalism?: Left Parties and European Integration. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R., and T. Bale. 2011. “The Radical Left in Coalition Government: Towards a Comparative Measurement of Success and Failure.” Party Politics 17(4):488–504. doi: 10.1177/1354068811400524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enggist, M., and M. Pinggera. 2022. “Radical Right Parties and Their Welfare State Stances – Not so Blurry after All?” West European Politics 45(1):102–28. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R., and M. J. Goodwin. 2010. “Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party.” Political Studies 58(1):1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., and S. Moylan. 1987. “After the Movies: Transient Mood and Social Judgments.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13(4):467–77. doi: 10.1177/0146167287134004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas JP, Crano WD and Fiedler K (Eds.). 2021. The Psychology of Populism: The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 2003. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N. 2022. “Many Ways to be Right: Cross-Pressured Voters in Western Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 52(1):146–61. doi: 10.1017/S0007123420000228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., and P. A. Hall. 2017. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right.” The British Journal of Sociology 68(S1):S57–S84. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giebler, H., M. Hirsch, B. Schürmann, and S. Veit. 2021. “Discontent with What? Linking Self-Centered and Society-Centered Discontent to Populist Party Support.” Political Studies 69 (4):900–20. doi: 10.1177/0032321720932115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., and A. T. Maitner. 2013. “Angry at the Unjust, Scared of the Powerful: Emotional Responses to Terrorist Threat.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 39(8):1069–82. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., L. Morales, and L. Ramiro. 2016. “Varieties of Radicalism: Examining the Diversity of Radical Left Parties and Voters in Western Europe.” West European Politics 39(2):351–79. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1064245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier, F., and T. Guerra. 2022. “From the People, like the People, or for the People? Candidate Appraisal among the French Yellow Vests.” Political Psychology 43(5):969–89. doi: 10.1111/pops.12826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2003. “The Moral Emotions.” Pp. 852–70 in Handbook of Affective Sciences, edited by Davidson R., Scherer K., and Goldsmith H. H. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., L. Bos, and C. H. de Vreese. 2017. “They Did It”: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication.” Communication Research 44(6):870–900. doi: 10.1177/0093650216644026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., L. Bos, and C. de Vreese. 2018. “Framing Blame: Toward a Better Understanding of the Effects of Populist Communication on Populist Party Preferences.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(3):380–98. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E., and F. Römer. 2023. “Contextual Welfare Chauvinism: Left-Wing Governments and Immigrant Welfare Rights in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 62(2):443–62. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., E. H. Walster, G. W. Walster, et al. 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., S. Feldman, E. Cassese, et al. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” Pp. 202–30 in The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited by Neuman R. W., Marcus G. E., and Crigler A. N. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46(3):319–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N. P., and L. Mason. 2022. Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. Chicago Studies in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved November 30, 2022 (https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo163195227.html).
   Google Scholar
• Koster, W. D., P. Achterberg, and J. V. D. Waal. 2013. “The New Right and the Welfare State: The Electoral Relevance of Welfare Chauvinism and Welfare Populism in The Netherlands.” International Political Science Review 34(1):3–20. doi: 10.1177/0192512112455443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurer, T. 2020. “The Declining Middle: Occupational Change, Social Status, and the Populist Right.” Comparative Political Studies 53(10–11):1798–835. doi: 10.1177/0010414020912283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. 1991. “Progress on a Cognitive-Motivational-Relational Theory of Emotion.” The American Psychologist 46 (8):819–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., and D. Keltner. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (1):146–59. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., and L. Z. Tiedens. 2006. “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19(2):115–37. doi: 10.1002/bdm.515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., R. M. Gonzalez, D. A. Small, and B. Fischhoff. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment.” Psychological Science 14(2):144–50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, G. 2017. “It’s the Emotions, Stupid! Anger about the Economic Crisis, Low Political Efficacy, and Support for Populist Parties.” Electoral Studies 50:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2011. Radical Left Parties in Europe. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203154878.
   Google Scholar
• March, L., and C. Mudde. 2005. “What’s Left of the Radical Left? The European Radical Left after 1989: Decline and Mutation.” Comparative European Politics 3(1):23–49. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110052.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 2000. “Emotions in Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1):221–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 2021. “The Rise of Populism: The Politics of Justice, Anger, and Grievance.” Pp. 81–104 in The Psychology of Populism: The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy, edited by Forgas J. P., Crano W. D., and Fiedler K. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., W. R. Neuman, and M. MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, P. 2020. “Anti-Elite Politics and Emotional Reactions to Socio-Economic Problems: Experimental Evidence on “Pocketbook Anger” from France, Germany, and the United States.” The British Journal of Sociology 71(4):608–24. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., and Y. Surel. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism.” Pp. 1–21 in Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Mény Y and Surel Y. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mewes, J., and S. Mau. 2013. “Globalization, Socio-Economic Status and Welfare Chauvinism: European Perspectives on Attitudes toward the Exclusion of Immigrants.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(3):228–45. doi: 10.1177/0020715213494395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morisi, D., and M. Wagner. 2020. “Bringing People Closer to the Elites: The Effect of Information on Populist Attitudes.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33(3):664–77. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edaa033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C, et al. 2017. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” Pp. 27–47 in The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Kaltwasser C. R., Taggart P., Espejo P. O. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde C and Kaltwasser CR (Eds.). 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48(2):147–74. doi: 10.1017/gov.2012.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A. 2021. “Fear and Loathing in Populist Campaigns? Comparing the Communication Style of Populists and Non-Populists in Elections Worldwide.” Journal of Political Marketing 20(2):219–50. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, R. W., G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, et al. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. G., M. Salmela, and C. von Scheve. 2022. “From Specific Worries to Generalized Anger: The Emotional Dynamics of Right-Wing Political Populism.” Pp. 145–60 in The Palgrave Handbook of Populism, edited by Oswald M. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_8.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2020. “Measuring Populism Worldwide.” Party Politics 26(6):697–717. doi: 10.1177/1354068820927686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108595841.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. 2010. “Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality.” The Journal of Politics 72(2):357–65. doi: 10.1017/S002238160999079X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramiro, L. 2016. “Support for Radical Left Parties in Western Europe: Social Background, Ideology and Political Orientations.” European Political Science Review 8(1):1–23. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, G., M. Guinjoan, and E. Anduiza. 2017. “The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4):444–61. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, G., M. Guinjoan, and E. Anduiza. 2020. “Empowered and Enraged: Political Efficacy, Anger and Support for Populism in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 59(4):797–816. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2018. “What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties.” European Political Science Review 10(3):351–68. doi: 10.1017/S1755773917000145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Akkerman. 2017. “Flank Attacks: Populism and Left-Right Radicalism in Western Europe.” Party Politics 23(3):193–204. doi: 10.1177/1354068815596514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and B. Burgoon. 2018. “The Paradox of Well-Being: Do Unfavorable Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting among the Less Well-Off?” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13):1720–53. doi: 10.1177/0010414017720707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., W. van der Brug, and S. L. de Lange. 2016. “Expressing or Fuelling Discontent? The Relationship between Populist Voting and Political Discontent.” Electoral Studies 43:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., C. Kessel S van, Froio, et al. 2019. The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. (www.popu-list.org).
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. 2013. “Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition.” European Political Science Review 5(1):1–26. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team 2021. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC. (http://www.rstudio.com/).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtke, O. 2020. “Politicizing Social Inequality: Competing Narratives from the Alternative for Germany and Left-Wing Movement Stand Up.” Frontiers in Sociology 5:13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00013 doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumacher, G., B. Vis, and K. van Kersbergen. 2013. “Political Parties’ Welfare Image, Electoral Punishment and Welfare State Retrenchment.” Comparative European Politics 11(1):1–21. doi: 10.1057/cep.2012.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., and G. Katsambekis. 2014. “Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2):119–42. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50 (1):76–136. doi: 10.1093/past/50.1.76.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., T. Brader, E. W. Groenendyk, K. Gregorowicz, and V. L. Hutchings. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73(1):156–70. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Bles, A. M., T. Postmes, B. LeKander-Kanis, and S. Otjes. 2018. “The Consequences of Collective Discontent: A New Measure of Zeitgeist Predicts Voting for Extreme Parties.” Political Psychology 39(2):381–98. doi: 10.1111/pops.12424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, S. M., and S. Van Kessel. 2018. “Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support.” European Journal of Political Research 57(1):68–92. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, S. 2013. “A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries.” Government and Opposition 48 (2):175–99. doi: 10.1017/gov.2012.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., T. Postmes, and R. Spears. 2008. “Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (4):504–35. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., T. Saguy, D. Mazzoni, and E. Cicognani. 2018. “The Curious, Context-Dependent Case of Anger: Explaining Voting Intentions in Three Different National Elections.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48(6):329–38. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, P., G. E. Marcus, and M. Foucault. 2018. “Emotional Responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Addressing the Authoritarianism Puzzle.” Political Psychology 39(3):557–75. doi: 10.1111/pops.12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., D. Halikiopoulou, and T. Exadaktylos. 2014. “Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2):388–402. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W. 2020. American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W., E. C. Connors, and B. Sinclair. 2022. “The Social Consequences of Political Anger.” The Journal of Politics 84 (3):1292–305. doi: 10.1086/718979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation: Emotions and Misperceptions.” Journal of Communication 65(4):699–719. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2021. “Populism as a Political Strategy: An Approach’s Enduring—and Increasing—Advantages.” Political Studies 69(2):185–9. doi: 10.1177/00323217211002669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz, D. S. 2018. “Persuasion through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication.” International Journal of Communication 12:25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-L. 2003. “Psycho-Political Correlates of Political Efficacy: The Case of the 1994 New Orleans Mayoral Election.” Journal of Black Studies 33 (6):729–60. doi: 10.1177/0021934703033006002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanchenko, K. 2022. “Stories about “Us” and “Them”: An Experimental Inquiry into the Relative Appeal of Populist Narratives.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 34(1)-30–64. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edac004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar