Non-preemptible last section assignment for reducing feedback latency in real-time control systems

References

• Arzen , K , Cervin , A , Eker , J and Sha , L . December 2000 . “ An Introduction to Control and Scheduling Co-design ” . In Proceedings of 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Vol. 5 , December , 4865 – 4870 .
   Google Scholar
• Audsley , N , Burns , A , Richardson , M , Tindell , K and Wellings , AJ . 1993 . Applying a New Schedulability Theory to Static Priority Preemptive Scheduling . Software Engineering Journal , 5 ( 5 ) : 284 – 292 .
   Google Scholar
• Bril , RJ , Lukkien , JJ and Verhaegh , WFJ . July 2007 . “ Worst-Case Response Time Analysis of Real-Time Tasks under Fixed-Priority Scheduling with Deferred Preemption Revisited ” . In Proceedings of the 19th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems July , 269 – 279 .
   Google Scholar
• Burns , A . 1994 . “ Preemptive Priority Based Scheduling: An Appropriate Engineering Approach ” . In Advances in Real-Time Systems , Edited by: Son , S . 225 – 248 . Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Cervin , A . June 1999 . “ Improved Scheduling of Control Tasks ” . In Proceedings of the 11th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems June , 4 – 10 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , RI , Burns , A , Bril , RJ and Lukkien , JJ . 2007 . Controller Area Network (CAN) Schedulability Analysis: Refuted, Revisited and Revised . Real-Time Systems , 35 ( 3 ) : 239 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George , L , Rivierre , N and Spuri , M . 1996 . ‘Preemptive and Non-preemptive Real-Time Uniprocessor Scheduling’ , INRIA Technical Report No. 2966
   Google Scholar
• Gerber , R , Hong , S and Saksena , M . 1995 . Guaranteeing Real-Time Requirements with Resource-based Calibration of Periodic Processes . IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , June : 579 – 592 .
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson , D , Cervin , A and Arzen , K . July 2002 . “ True Time: Simulation of Control Loops under Shared Computer Resources ” . In 15th IFAC World Congress on Automatic Control July ,
   Google Scholar
• Kim , BK . 1998 . Task Scheduling with Feedback Latency for Real-Time Control Systems . Proceedings of Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications , October : 37 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Lehoczky , J , Sha , L and Ding , Y . 1989 . The Rate Monotonic Scheduling Algorithm: Exact Characterization and Average Case Behavior . Proceedings of Real Time Systems Symposium , December : 166 – 171 .
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln , B and Cervin , A . 2002 . “ Jitterbug: A Tool for Analysis of Real-Time Control Performance ” . In Proceedings of 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Vol. 2 , 1319 – 1324 .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , L . 2000 . Real-Time Systems , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Ryu , M and Hong , S . June 1997 . “ Streamlining Real-Time Controller Design: From Performance Specifications to End-to-end Timing Constraints ” . In Proceedings of Real-Time Technology and Application Symposium June , 91 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Seto , D , Lehoczky , J and Sha , L . 1998 . Task Period Selection and Schedulability in Real-Time Systems . Proceedings of Real-Time Systems Symposium , December : 188 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Seto , D , Lehoczky , J , Sha , L and Shin , K . December 1996 . “ On Task Schedulability in Real-Time Control Systems ” . In Proceedings of Real-Time Systems Symposium December , 13 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Wang , Y and Saksena , M . December 1999 . “ Scheduling Fixed-Priority Tasks with Preemption Threshold ” . In Proceedings, International Conference on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications December , 328 – 335 .
   Google Scholar