A novel online adaptive time delay identification technique

References

• Aghasi, H., Hashemi, M., & Khalaj, B.H. (2011, May). Source localization through adaptive signal attenuation model and time delay estimation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Telecommunications (pp. 151–156). Ayia Napa, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Annaswamy, A.M., Skantze, F.P., & Loh, A.P. (1998). Adaptive control of continuous time systems with convex/concave parametrization. Automatica, 34, 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi-Sadjadi, M.R., Charleston, S., Wilbur, J., & Dobeck, G.J. (1998). A new time delay estimation in subbands for resolving multiple specular reflections. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 46(12), 3398–3403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, E.-W., & Chyung, D.H. (1993). Improving delay estimates derived from least-square algorithms and Pade approximations. International Journal of Systems Science, 24(4), 745–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyasz, Cs., & Keviczky, L. (1994). Recursive time delay estimation method. International Journal of Systems Science, 25(11), 1857–1865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastard, C.L., Baltazart, V., & Wang, Y. (2010). Modified esprit (m-esprit) algorithm for time delay estimation in both any noise and any radar pulse context by a GPR radar. Signal Processing, 90, 173–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrak, A., & Tatlicioglu, E. (2011). A novel online adaptive time delay identification technique. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 3338–3343). Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrak, A. (2013). Online time delay identification and adaptive control for general classes of nonlinear systems (doctoral dissertation). Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrak, A., & Tatlicioglu, E. (2012). Online time delay identification and control for general classes of nonlinear systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 1591–1596). Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, T.P., & Nath, R. (2010). Maximum likelihood estimation of time delays in multipath acoustic channel. Signal Processing, 90, 1750–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, S., & Ljung, L. (2003). A review of time-delay estimation techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 2502–2507). Maui, HA.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., Gao, Y., & Joseph, P. (2007). On the relationship between time and frequency domain methods in time delay estimation for leak detection in water distribution pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 304, 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Liu, Y., Kong, F., & He, N. (2011). Acoustic source localization based on generalized cross-correlation time-delay estimation. Procedia Engineering, 15, 4912–4919.
   Google Scholar
• Diop, S., Kolmanovsky, I., Moraal, P.E., & van Nieuwstadt, M. (2001). Preserving stability/performance when facing an unknown time-delay. Control Engineering Practice, 9, 1319–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dydek, Z., Annaswamy, A.M., & Lavretsky, E. (2010). Adaptive control and the NASA X–15–3 flight revisited. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 30, 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Brennan, M., & Joseph, P.F. (2009). On the effects of reflections on time delay estimation for leak detection in buried plastic water pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 325, 649–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudet, P., & Glotin, H. (2006). Real-time 3D tracking of whales by echo-robust precise TDOA estimates with a widely-spaced hydrophone array. Applied Acoustics, 67, 1106–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harva, M., & Raychaudhury, S. (2008). Bayesian estimation of time delays between unevenly sampled signals. Neurocomputing, 72, 32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Jing, X., & Karimi, H.R. (2014). Output-feedback-based H∞ control for vehicle suspension systems with control delay. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, K.W., Chan, F.K., & So, H. (2009). Accurate time delay estimation based passive localization. Signal Processing, 89, 1835–1838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J.M., Jimenez, A.R., Seco, F., Calderon, L., Pons, J.L., & Ceres, R. (2002). Estimating the 3D-position from time delay data of US-waves: Experimental analysis and a new processing algorithm. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 101, 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, N., Tatlicioglu, E., & Dawson, D.M. (2010). Range identification for nonlinear parameterizable paracatadioptric systems. Automatica, 46, 1129–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2003). A novel joint estimator of direction-of-arrival and time-delay for multiple source localization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks & Signal Processing (pp. 1294–1297).
   Google Scholar
• Quazi, A. (1981). An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, 29, 527–533.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, J.P. (2003). Time-delay systems: An overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica, 39, 1667–1694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaltaf, S. (2007). Neuro-fuzzy based time-delay estimation using DCT coefficients. ISA Transactions, 46, 21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K.K., & Joshi, S.D. (2007). Time delay estimation using fractional Fourier transform. Signal Processing, 87, 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H.C. (2002). Noisy input–output system identification approach for time delay estimation. Signal Processing, 82, 1471–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, J., Feuer, A., & Palmor, Z.J. (1994). Time delay estimation in continuous linear time-invariant systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39(4), 823–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugnait, J.K. (1996). Frequency domain adaptive filters using higher-order statistics with application to adaptive time delay estimation. International Journal of Adaptive Control & Signal Processing, 10, 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Wang, L., & Wan, J. (2006, June). A new localization technique based on network TDOA information. In Proceedings of International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (pp. 127–130) Chengdu, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, J., Li, P., & Wen, Y. (2007). A new method for unbiased time–delay estimation in noisy environments. International Journal of Adaptive Control & Signal Processing, 21, 623–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, J., Wen, Y., & Li, P. (2008, June). Time delay estimation method for leak location of buried water distribution pipes. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (pp. 3052–3056). Chongqing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, S., Ding, S.X., Haghani, A., Hao, H., & Zhang, P. (2012). A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. Journal of Process Control, 22, 1567–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., Qi, W., & Fanrong, M. (2012, June). Application of time delay estimation in stress wave test of crude oil pipeline leakage. In Proceedings of the World Automation Congress (pp. 1–4). Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., & Li, Y. (2006). A control scheme for bilateral teleoperation systems based on time–varying communication delay identification. In Proceedings of Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics (pp. 273–278). Harbin, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, D.H., & Frank, P.M. (2000). A real–time estimation approach to time–varying time delay and parameters of NARX processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23, 1763–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar