An analysis of parameter sensitivities of preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms

References

• Archer, G., Saltelli, A., & Sobol, I. (1997). Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 58(2), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, J., & Zitzler, E. (2011). HypE: An algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 19, 45–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brest, J., Greiner, S., Boskovic, B., Mernik, M., & Zumer, V. (2006). Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10, 646–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Corne, D., & Knowles, J. (2007). Techniques for highly multiobjective optimisation: Some nondominated points are better than others. In GECCO 2007: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 773–780). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Weinheim: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., & Jain, H. (2014). An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point based non-dominated sorting approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(4), 577–601. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Mohan, M., & Mishra, S. (2003). Towards a quick computation of well-spread Pareto-optimal solutions. In Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 222–236). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Mohan, M., & Mishra, S. (2005). Evaluating the epsilon-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions. Evolutionary Computation, 13, 501–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., & Saxena, D. (2006). Searching for Pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI-2006), pp. 3352–3360. Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Sindhya, K., & Okabe, T. (2007). Self-adaptive simulated binary crossover for real-parameter optimization. In GECCO 2007: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 1187–1194). London: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Derrac, J., García, S., Molina, D., & Herrera, F. (2011). A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiben, A.E., Hinterding, R., & Michalewicz, Z. (1999). Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(2), 124–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerich, M., Beume, N., & Naujoks, B. (2005). An EMO algorithm using the hypervolume measure as selection criterion. In Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 62–76). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., & Fleming, P. (1993). Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation discussion and generalization. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (pp. 416–423). New York, NY: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., & Fleming, P. (1998). Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms. I. A unified formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 28(1), 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston, MA: Addison-wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hadka, D., & Reed, P. (2012). Diagnostic assessment of search controls and failure modes in many-objective evolutionary optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 20(3), 423–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., & While, L. (2006). A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10, 477–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. (2003). Multiple single objective Pareto sampling. In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2003 IEEE Congress on (pp. 2678–2684). Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. (2005). Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: Many once or one many? In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2005 IEEE Congress on (pp. 222–227). Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., & Nojima, Y. (2008). Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2008 IEEE Congress on (pp. 2419–2426). Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., Yang, S., & Liu, X. (2014). Shift-based density estimation for Pareto-based algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(3), 348–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lygoe, R.J., Cary, M., & Fleming, P.J. (2010). A many-objective optimisation decision-making process applied to automotive diesel engine calibration. Simulated evolution and learning (pp. 638–646). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murata, T., Ishibuchi, H., & Gen, M. (2001). Specification of genetic search directions in cellular multi-objective genetic algorithms. In E. Zitzler, K. Deb, L. Thiele, C.A.C. Coello, and D. Corne (Eds.), Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 82–95). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2003a). An adaptive divide-and-conquer methodology for evolutionary multi-criterion optimisation. Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 72–72). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2003b). Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: An exploratory analysis. In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2003 IEEE Congress on (pp. 2066–2073). Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2007). On the evolutionary optimization of many conflicting objectives. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11, 770–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purshouse, R., Jalbǎ, C., & Fleming, P. (2011). Preference-driven co-evolutionary algorithms show promise for many-objective optimisation. In Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 136–150). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145(2), 280–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010). Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications, 181(2), 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, R. (2008). Alternative global goodness metrics and sensitivity analysis: Heuristics to check the robustness of conclusions from studies comparing virtual screening methods. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 48(2), 426–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and computers in simulation, 55(1-3), 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I., & Kucherenko, S. (2005). On global sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 11(1), 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, I.M. (1993). Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiment, 1(1), 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., Van Werkhoven, K. (2007). Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(2), 793–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2012). Local preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms. In GECCO 2012: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 513–520). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2013a). On finding well-spread Pareto optimal solutions by preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithm. In GECCO 2013: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 695–702). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2013b). Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithm using weights for many-objective optimisation. In GECCO 2013: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 101–102). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2013c). Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms for many-objective optimisation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 17(4), 474–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (2013d). “Whatever works best for you” – a new method for a priori and progressive multi-objective optimisation. In R.C. Purshouse, P.J. Fleming, C.M. Fonseca, S. Greco, & J. Shaw (Eds.), Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 337–351). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R.C., & Fleming, P.J. (2013e). Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithm using adaptively generated goal vectors. In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2013 IEEE Congress on (pp. 916–923). Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Purshouse, R., & Fleming, P. (in press). Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms using weight vectors. European Journal of Operational Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Li, M., Liu, X., & Zheng, J. (2013). A grid-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 17(5), 721–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6), 712–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., & Künzli, S. (2004). Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In Parallel problem solving from nature – PPSN VIII (pp. 832–842). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Thiele, L. (2002). SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Methods for Design Optimisation and Control with Application to Industrial Problems EUROGEN 2001, 3242(103), 95–100.
   Google Scholar