336
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A dynamically weight adjustment in the consensus reaching process for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations

, &
Pages 1311-1321 | Received 07 Apr 2016, Accepted 21 Oct 2016, Published online: 15 Nov 2016

References

  • Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D., & Shetty, C.M. (2013). Nonlinear programming: Theory and algorithms. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chen, X., Zhang, H.J., & Dong, Y.C. (2015). The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey. Information Fusion, 24, 72–83.
  • Chiclana, F., Mata, F., Martinez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Alonso, S. (2008). Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 16, 35–53.
  • Choudhury, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2006). Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1776–1799.
  • Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F., Li, H.Y., & Feng, B. (2010). The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 455–463.
  • Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (2016). Bridging gaps between several forms of granular computing. Granular Computing, 1, 115–126.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2007). A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15, 863–877.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 98–109.
  • Kacprzyk, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (1988). A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, 34, 316–325.
  • Mendel, J.M. (2016). A comparison of three approaches for estimating (synthesizing) an interval type-2 fuzzy set model of a linguistic term for computing with words. Granular Computing, 1, 59–69.
  • Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2014). Consensus under a fuzzy context: Taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information Fusion, 20, 252–271.
  • Parreiras, R., Ekel, P., & Bernardes, F. (2012). A dynamic consensus scheme based on a nonreciprocal fuzzy preference relation modeling. Information Sciences, 211, 1–17.
  • Pedrycz, W., & Chen, S.M. (2015). Granular computing and decision-making: Interactive and iterative approaches. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Peters, G., & Weber, R. (2016). DCC: A framework for dynamic granular clustering. Granular Computing, 1, 1–11.
  • Świtalski, Z. (2003). General transitivity conditions for fuzzy reciprocal preference matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 137, 85–100.
  • Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12, 117–131.
  • Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529–539.
  • Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2009). On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. InIEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (pp. 1378–1382). IEEE.
  • Wu, Z.B., & Xu, J.P. (2012). A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 206, 58–73.
  • Wu, Z.B., & Xu, J.P. (2016a). Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega, 65, 28–40.
  • Wu, Z.B., & Xu, J.P. (2016b). Possibility distribution-based approach for MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46, 694–705.
  • Xia, M.M., & Xu, Z.S. (2011). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, 395–407.
  • Xia, M.M., & Xu, Z.S. (2013). Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 865–897.
  • Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S., & Chen, J. (2013a). Algorithms for improving consistency or consensus of reciprocal [0, 1]-valued preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 216, 108–133.
  • Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S., & Chen, N. (2013b). Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22, 259–279.
  • Xu, J.P., & Wu, Z.B. (2013). A maximizing consensus approach for alternative selection based on uncertain linguistic preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64, 999–1008.
  • Xu, Y.J., Chen, L., Rodríguez, R.M., Herrera, F., & Wang, H.M. (2016). Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 99, 71–78.
  • Xu, Y.J., Da, Q.L., & Wang, H.M. (2011). A note on group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations. Soft Computing, 15, 1289–1300.
  • Xu, Y.J., Li, K.W., & Wang, H.M. (2013a). Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Information Sciences, 253, 56–73.
  • Xu, Y.J., Patnayakuni, R., & Wang, H.M. (2013b). Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 2139–2152.
  • Xu, Y.J., Patnayakuni, R., & Wang, H.M. (2013c). The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation. Information Sciences, 224, 152–164.
  • Xu, Y.J., & Wang, H.M. (2013). Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 5171–5183.
  • Xu, Z.S., & Xia, M.M. (2011a). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 181, 2128–2138.
  • Xu, Z.S., & Xia, M.M. (2011b). On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26, 410–425.
  • Yao, Y. (2016). A triarchic theory of granular computing. Granular Computing, 1, 145–157.
  • Yu, L.A., & Lai, K.K. (2011). A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support. Decision Support Systems, 51, 307–315.
  • Yu, L.A., Wang, S.Y., & Lai, K.K. (2009). An intelligent-agent-based fuzzy group decision making model for financial multicriteria decision support: The case of credit scoring. European Journal of Operational Research, 195, 942–959.
  • Zhang, G.Q., Dong, Y.C., & Xu, Y.F. (2012). Linear optimization modeling of consistency issues in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2415–2420.
  • Zhang, W.C., Xu, Y.J., & Wang, H.M. (2016). A consensus reaching model for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Systems Science, 47, 389–405.
  • Zhang, Z.M., Wang, C., & Tian, X.D. (2015). A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 86, 77–101.
  • Zhang, Z.M., & Wu, C. (2014). A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations. Information Sciences, 282, 136–166.
  • Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S., & Xu, J.P. (2014). Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44, 1328–1337.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.