178
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An automatic iterative decision-making method for intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preference relations

, , , &
Pages 2779-2793 | Received 22 May 2016, Accepted 26 May 2017, Published online: 30 Jun 2017

References

  • Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.
  • Chen, S. M., Lin, T. E., & Lee, L. W. (2014). Group decision-making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Information Sciences, 259, 1–15.
  • Chen, H. Y., Zhou, L. G., & Han, B. (2011). On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations and its application in the group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 816–823.
  • Chen, Z. C., Liu, P. H., & Pei, Z. (2015). An approach to multiple attribute group decision-making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8, 747–760.
  • Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2001). Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122, 277–291.
  • Dong, Y. C., Li, C. C., & Herrera, F. (2015). An optimization-based approach to adjusting unbalanced linguistic preference relations to obtain a required consistency level. Information Sciences, 292, 27–38.
  • Gong, Z. W., Li, L. S., Zhou, F. X., & Yao, T. X. (2009). Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1187–1193.
  • Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 67–82.
  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996). Direct approach processes in group decision-making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 175–190.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 98–109.
  • Hu, J. H., Zhang, X. L., Chen, X. H., & Liu, Y. M. (2016). Hesitant fuzzy information measures and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making. International Journal of Systems Science, 47, 62–76.
  • Hu, M. M., Ren, P. Y., Lan, J. B., Wang, J., & Zheng, W. M. (2014). Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations”. European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 771–773.
  • Hülya, B. (2014). Group decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 70, 33–43.
  • Jiang, Y., Xu, Z. S., & Yu, X. H. (2015). Group decision-making based on incomplete intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations. Information Sciences, 295, 33–52.
  • Lan, J. B., Hu, M. M., Ye, X. M., & Sun, S. Q. (2012). Deriving interval weights from an interval multiplicative consistent fuzzy preference relation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 26, 128–134.
  • Lee, L. W. (2012). Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 11666–11678.
  • Liao, H. C., & Xu, Z. S. (2014a). Automatic procedures for group decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(5), 2341–2353.
  • Liao, H. C., & Xu, Z. S. (2014b). Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 1669–1681.
  • Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Xia, M. M. (2014a). Multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(6), 2969–2985.
  • Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Xia, M. M. (2014b). Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision-making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13, 47–76.
  • Liu, X. W., Pan, Y. W., Xu, Y. J., & Yu, S. (2012). Least square completion and inconsistency repair methods for additively consistent fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 198, 1–19.
  • Ma, J., Fan, Z. P., Jiang, Y. P., Mao, J. Y., & Ma, L. (2006). A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 20–33.
  • Malakooti, B., & Zhou, Y. Q. (1994). Feed forward artificial neural networks for solving discrete multiple criteria decision-making problems. Management Science, 40, 1542–1561.
  • Nurmi, H. (1981). Approaches to collective decision-making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 249–259.
  • Orlovsky, S. A. (1978). Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 155–167.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision-making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12, 117–131.
  • Tao, Z. F., Chen, H. Y., Zhou, L. G., & Liu, J. P. (2014). On new operational laws of 2-tuple linguistic information using Archimedean t-norm and s-norm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 66, 156–165.
  • Tao, Z. F., Liu, X., Chen, H. Y., & Chen, Z. Q. (2015). Group decision-making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations via cooperative games method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 83, 184–192.
  • Urena, R., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Confidence-consistency driven group decision-making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 86–96.
  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241.
  • Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. S. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 735–747.
  • Wang, Z. J. (2013). Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 6377–6388.
  • Wang, Z. J. (2015a). Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean. Information Sciences, 314, 169–183.
  • Wang, Z. J. (2015b). Geometric consistency based interval weight elicitation from intuitionistic preference relations using logarithmic least square optimization. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 14, 289–310.
  • Wang, Z. J. (2016). A two-stage linear goal programming approach to eliciting interval weights from additive interval fuzzy preference relations. Soft Computing, 20, 2721–2732.
  • Wang, Z. J., & Li, K. W. (2015). A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision-making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 242, 890–900.
  • Wang, Z. J., & Li, K. W. (2016). Group decision-making with incomplete intuitionistic preference relations based on quadratic programming models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93, 162–170.
  • Xia, M. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2013). Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 865–897.
  • Xia, M. M., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2013). Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21, 113–133.
  • Xia, M. M., Xu, Z. S., & Wang, Z. (2014). Multiplicative consistency-based decision support system for incomplete linguistic preference relations. International Journal of Systems Science, 45, 625–636.
  • Xu, Z. S. (1999). Study on the relation between two classes of scales in AHP. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 19, 97–101.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2002a). A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Operations Research and Management Science, 10, 16–19.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2002b). Two methods for priorities of complementary judgment matrices-weighted least-square method and eigenvector method. Systems Engineering – Theory & Practice, 22, 71–75.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2004a). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision-making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166, 19–30.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2004b). EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 12, 791–810.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2005). Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision-making. Omega, 33, 249–254.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2006). An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and the induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision-making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decision Support Systems, 41, 488–499.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2007a). Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15, 1179–1187.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2007b). A survey of preference relations. International Journal of General Systems, 36, 179–203.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2007c). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision-making. Information Sciences, 177, 2363–2379.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2010). The least variance priority method (LVM) for fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Systems Engineering – Theory and Practice, 21, 93–96.
  • Xu, Z. S. (2013). Priority weight intervals derived from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21, 642–654.
  • Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2015). A survey of approaches to decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 131–142.
  • Xu, Z. S., & Yager, R. R. (2006). Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems, 35, 417–433.
  • Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 183–190.
  • Yager, R. R., & Kacprzyk, J. (1997). The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and Applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.
  • Zhang, G. Q., Dong, Y. C., & Xu, Y. F. (2014). Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Information Fusion, 17, 46–55.
  • Zhang, H. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2005). Uncertain linguistic information based COWA and COWG operators and their applications. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 6, 604–608.
  • Zhang, W. C., Xu, Y. J., & Wang, H. M. (2016). A consensus reaching model for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision-making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Systems Science, 47, 389–405.
  • Zhang, Y., Ma, H., Liu, B., & Liu, J. (2012). Group decision-making with 2-tuple intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Soft Computing, 16, 1439–1446.
  • Zhou, H., Wang, J. Q., Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2016). Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning. International Journal of Systems Science, 47, 314–327.
  • Zhou, L. G., & Chen, H. Y. (2013). The induced linguistic continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to group decision-making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 222–232.
  • Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2014). Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 35–45.
  • Zhu, B., Xu, Z. S., & Xu, J. P. (2014). Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 44, 1328–1337.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.