288
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic group decision-making model based on the Choquet integral operator

, , , , &
Pages 407-424 | Received 02 Dec 2016, Accepted 12 Nov 2017, Published online: 30 Nov 2017

References

  • Aggarwal, M. (2017). Learning of aggregation models in multi criteria decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 119, 1–9.
  • Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.
  • Ashayeri, J., Tuzkaya, G., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2010). Supply chain partners and configuration selection: An intuitionistic fuzzy Chouquet integral operator based approach. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 39(3), 3642–3649.
  • Branke, J., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2016). Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 884–901.
  • Bryson, N., & Joseph, A. (2000). Generating consensus priority interval vectors for group decision-making in the AHP. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9(4), 127–137.
  • Bustince, H., Galar, M., Bedregal, B., Kolesarova, A., & Mesiar, R. (2013). A new approach to interval-valued Choquet integrals and the problem of ordering in interval-valued fuzzy set applications. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21(6), 1150–1162.
  • Chen, X. (2014). A risk elimination coordination method for large group decision-making in natural disaster emergencies. Human & Ecological Risk Assessment, 21(5), 1314–1325.
  • Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Mart, & Nez, L. (1998). Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. Information Sciences An International Journal, 107(1–4), 177–194.
  • Dong, G. P., Kwun, Y. C., Jin, H. P., & Park, I. Y. (2009). Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 50(9), 1279–1293.
  • Dong, Y., Xu, Y., & Yu, S. (2009). Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(6), 1366–1378.
  • Ehsani, E., Kazemi, N., Olugu, E. U., Grosse, E. H., & Schwindl, K. (2016). Applying fuzzy multi-objective linear programming to a project management decision with nonlinear fuzzy membership functions. Neural Computing & Applications, 2193–2206 28(8).
  • Fan, Z. P., & Liu, Y. (2010). A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information. Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 37(5), 4000–4008.
  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2000). A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 114(1), 43–58.
  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996). A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 78(1), 73–87.
  • Herrera, F., & Martinez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746–752.
  • Hu, K. J. (2015). An interactive approach for the multi-objective transportation problem with interval parameters. International Journal of Production Research, 53(4), 1051–1064.
  • Ishii, K., & Sugeno, M. (1985). A model of human evaluation process using fuzzy measure. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(1), 19–38.
  • Kazemi, N. (2014). Multi–objective supplier selection and order allocation under quantity discounts with fuzzy goals and fuzzy constraints. Publications of Darmstadt Technical University Institute for Business Studies, 7(1), 66–96.
  • Kazemi, N., Ehsani, E., Glock, C. H., & Schwindl, K. (2015). A mathematical programming model for a multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation problem with fuzzy objectives. International Journal of Services & Operations Management, 21(4), 435–464.
  • Kong, T., Li, G., Feng, T., & Sun, L. (2015). Effects of marketing–manufacturing integration across stages of new product development on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(8), 1–16.
  • Liginlal, D., & Ow, T. T. (2005). On policy capturing with fuzzy measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 167(2), 461–474.
  • Lin, J., Lan, J. B., & Lin, Y. H. (2009). Multi-attribute group decision-making method based on the aggregation operators of interval 2-tuple linguistic information. Jilin Normal University, 1, 5–9.
  • Ling, Z., Peng, Z., Newton, S., Fang, J. X., Zhou, D. Q., & Zhang, L. P. (2015). Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method. Energy, 90, 953–964.
  • Liu, B., Huo, T., Liao, P., Gong, J., & Xue, B. (2015). A group decision-making aggregation model for contractor selection in large scale construction projects based on two-stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path modeling. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(5), 855–883.
  • Liu, B., Huo, T., Wang, X., Shen, Q., & Chen, Y. (2013). The decision model of the intuitionistic fuzzy group bid evaluation for urban infrastructure projects considering social costs. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(3), 263–273.
  • Liu, B., Shen, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2015). A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making experts in a linguistic environment. Information Fusion, 23(C), 156–165.
  • Liu, X., Tao, Z., Chen, H., & Zhou, L. (2017). A new interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operator and its application to multiattribute group decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19, 1–23.
  • Malviya, R. K., & Kant, R. (2016). Hybrid decision making approach to predict and measure the success possibility of green supply chain management implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 387–409.
  • Marichal, J. L. (2002). Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities. European Journal of Operational Research, 137(3), 612–624.
  • Meng, F., & Chen, X. (2015a). Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their application based on fuzzy measures. Cognitive Computation, 7(4), 445–463.
  • Meng, F., & Chen, X. (2015b). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making based on cross entropy and 2-additive measures. Soft Computing, 19(7), 2071–2082.
  • Meng, F., Zhang, Q., & Cheng, H. (2013). Approaches to multiple-criteria group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral with respect to the generalized λ-shapley index. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 237–249.
  • Olson, D. L., & Wu, D. (2013). The impact of distribution on value-at-risk measures. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 58(9–10), 1670–1676.
  • Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2016). Group aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: A comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 421–457.
  • Ozcan, T., & Tuysuz, F. (2016). Modified grey relational analysis integrated with grey dematel approach for the performance evaluation of retail stores. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(02), 353–386.
  • Peng, J. J., Zhou, H., Chen, X. H., & Wang, J. Q. (2015). A multi-criteria decision-making approach based on TODIM and Choquet integral within a multiset hesitant fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 9(4), 2087–2097.
  • Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2016). Multi-attribute group decision making based on Choquet integral under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(1), 133–152.
  • Shapley, L. S. (1988). A value for n-person games. In A. Roth (Ed.), The Shapley Value : Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley (pp.31–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511528446.003.
  • Szwejczewski, M., Goffin, K., & Anagnostopoulos, Z. (2015). Product service systems, after-sales service and new product development. International Journal of Production Research, 53(17), 1–20.
  • Tan, C. Q., & Ben-Jiang, M. A. (2010). Multi-attribute group decision making based on linguistic Choquet integral operator. XI Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering & Electronics, 32(11), 2352–2355.
  • Tan, C., & Chen, X. (2013). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on VIKOR and Choquet integral. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013(4), 1–16.
  • Tan, C., Wu, D. D., & Ma, B. (2011). Group decision making with linguistic preference relations with application to supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications An International Journal, 38(12), 14382–14389.
  • Uygun, Ö., & Dede, A. (2016). Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 502–511.
  • Vinodh, S., Balagi, T. S. S., & Patil, A. (2016). A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(9), 1979–1987.
  • Wang, X. Z., He, Y. L., Dong, L. C., & Zhao, H. Y. (2011). Particle swarm optimization for determining fuzzy measures from data. Information Sciences, 181(19), 4230–4252.
  • Wang, J. Q., Wang, D. D., Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making method based on interval 2-tuple linguistic information and Choquet integral aggregation operators. Soft Computing, 19(2), 389–405.
  • Wang, J., Wang, J. Q., Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2016). Multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18(1), 1–17.
  • Wei, G. W. (2008). Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8), 833–836.
  • Wei, G. W. (2010a). Extension of TOPSIS method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. Knowledge and Information Systems, 25(3), 623–634.
  • Wei, G. W. (2010b). A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7895–7900.
  • Wei, G. W. (2011). Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(1), 32–38.
  • Wei, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, X. (1994). Concept of consistence and weights of the judgement matrix in the uncertain type of AHP. Systems Engineering – Theory & Practice, 14(4), 16–22.
  • Wei, G., Zhao, X., & Lin, R. (2013). Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 46(4), 43–53.
  • Wong, K. Y. (2015). Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: An integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 383–408.
  • Wu, J., Chen, F., Nie, C., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Intuitionistic fuzzy-valued Choquet integral and its application in multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, 222(4), 509–527.
  • Wu, D., Olson, D. L., & Dolgui, A. (2015). Decision making in enterprise risk management: A review and introduction to special issue. Omega, 57, 1–4.
  • Wu, D. D., Olson, D. L., & Luo, C. (2014). A decision support approach for accounts receivable risk management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics Systems, 44(12), 1624–1632.
  • Xu, Z. (2004). Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 168(1–4), 171–184.
  • Xu, Z. (2006a). A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(6), 593–604.
  • Xu, Z. (2006b). On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators. International Journal of General Systems, 35(1), 17–28.
  • Xu, Z. (2008). Linguistic aggregation operators: An overview. Studies in Fuzziness & Soft Computing, 220, 163–181.
  • Xu, Z. (2010). Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Information Sciences, 180(5), 726–736.
  • Xu, Z. (2011). Attribute weights determination models for consensus maximization in multiple attribute group decision-making. International Journal of General Systems, 40(7), 755–774.
  • Xu, X., Cai, C., Chen, X., & Zhou, Y. (2015). A multi-attribute large group emergency decision making method based on group preference consistency of generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Journal of Systems Science & Systems Engineering, 24(2), 211–228.
  • Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, 18(1), 183–190.
  • Yang, W., & Chen, Z. (2012). New aggregation operators based on the Choquet integral and 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2662–2668.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences , 8(3), 199–249.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1983). A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 9(1), 149–184.
  • Ze, X. U. (2000). Research on consistency of the complex interval judgement matrix in AHP. Journal of Systems Science & Systems Engineering, 9(2), 31–35.
  • Zhang, H. (2012). The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 56(1–2), 27–35.
  • Zhang, H. (2013). Some interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators and application in multiattribute group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 4269–4282.
  • Zhang, Z., & Guo, C. (2016). Consistency and consensus models for group decision-making with uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. International Journal of Systems Science, 47(11), 2572–2587.
  • Zhang, W., Ju, Y., & Liu, X. (2017). Multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 28–38.
  • Zhang, W., Xu, Y., & Wang, H. (2016). A consensus reaching model for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Systems Science, 47(2), 389–405.
  • Zhang, L., & Zhou, D. (2007). New method for hierarchical multiple criteria decision making based on the Choquet integral. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 39(6), 824–828.
  • Zhou, S., Xu, X., Zhou, Y., & Chen, X. (2017). A large group decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(3), 881–897.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.