The Effect of Board Capital and Conflict on the Tasks of the Board of Directors

References

• Atuahene-Gima, K., and H. Li. 2004. “Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures.” Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 583–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock, H. 1979. Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, P.; A. Siegel; J. Daly; T. Tyler; and C. Martin. 1997. “When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 558–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D., and A. Huczynski. 1997. Organizational Behavior: An Introductory Text. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholtz, A.; A. Amason; and M. Rutherford. 2005. “The Impact of Board Monitoring and Involvement on Top Management Team Affective Conflict.” Journal of Managerial Issues 17(4): 405–422.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, P., and T. Probst. 1998. “Social Values and Social Conflict in Creative Problem Solving and Categorization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5): 1300–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M.; and J. Westphal. 2001. “The Strategic Context of External Network Ties: Examining the Impact of Director Appointments on Board Involvement in Strategic Decision Making.” Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 639–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C.; D. Dalton; and A. Cannella. 2003. “Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data.” Academy of Management Review 28(3): 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D.; C. Daily; A. Ellestrand; and J. Johnson. 1998. “Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 19(3): 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C., and L. Weingart. 2003. “Task versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4):741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C.; F. Harinck; and A. Van Vianen. 1999. “Conflict and Performance in Groups and Organizations.” In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 14, ed. C. Cooper and I. Robertson 396–414. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, L. 1987. China’s Continuous Revolution: The Post-Liberation Epoch, 1949–1981. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and D. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D., and F. Milliken. 1999. “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups.” Academy of Management Review 24(3): 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C., and D. Organ. 1973. “An Evaluation of Causal Models Linking the Received Role with Job Satisfaction.” Administrative Science Quarterly 18(1): 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D.; A. von Werder; and E. Zajac. 2008. “New Directions in Corporate Governance Research.” Organization Science 19(3): 381–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm-Kerwin, S., and A. Doherty. 2010. “Intragroup Conflict in Non-Profit Sport Boards.” Journal of Sport Management 24(3): 245–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A., and T. Dalziel. 2003. “Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives.” Academy of Management Review 28(3): 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M. 2005. “Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioral Perspectives of Corporate Governance.” British Journal of Management 16(1): 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2007. Boards, Governance and Value Creation. The Human Side of Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. 1995. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40(2): 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., and D. A. Kashy. 1992. “Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 112: 165–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, R.; A. Hillman; A. Zardkoohi; and A. Cannella. 2008. “Former Government Officials as Outside Directors: The Role of Human and Social Capital.” Academy of Management Journal 51(5): 999–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., and K. Atuahene-Gima. 2001. “The Impact of Interaction between R&D and Marketing on New Product Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese High Technology Firms.” International Journal of Technology Management 21(1/2): 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M. 1986. Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, F., and L. Martins. 1996. “Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups.” Academy of Management Review 21(2): 402–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A.; A. Zattoni; and F. Zona. 2009. “Making Boards Effective: An Empirical Examination of Board Task Performance.” British Journal of Management 20(1): 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power in and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice–Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.” The Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayitam, S., and R. Dooley. 2009. “The Interplay between Cognitive and Affective Conflict and Cognition—and Affect-Based Trust in Influencing Decision Outcomes.” Journal of Business Research 62(8): 789–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhe, A. 1993. “Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation.” Academy of Management Journal 36(4): 794–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J., and S. Zahra. 1992. “Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies 29(4): 411–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. 1972. “Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and Its Environment.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17(2): 218–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1973. “Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization–Environment Linkage.” Administrative Science Quarterly 18(3): 349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource-Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.; S. MacKenzie; J. Lee; and N. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., and D. Organ. 1986. “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management 12(4): 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.; W. Todor; R. Grover; and V. Huber. 1984. “Situational Moderators of Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors: Fact or Fiction?.” Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 34(1): 21–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, A. 2005. “The Importance of Context and Time for Understanding Board Behavior.” International Studies of Management and Organizations 34(2): 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. 2005. Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.; T. McNulty; and P. Stiles. 2005. “Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom.” British Journal of Management 16(1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. 1989. “Conflict.” In Small Groups in Organizational Settings, ed. R. Ross and J. Ross. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, T., and R. Peterson. 2000. “Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust.” Journal of Applied Psychology 85(1): 102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, P., and B. Taylor. 2001. Boards at Work, How Directors View Their Roles and Responsibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., L. Rips and K. Rasinski. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z.; X. Wang; and C. Su. 2006. “A Review of Research Methodologies in International Business.” International Business Review 15(6): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and J. Pearce. 1989. “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model.” Journal of Management 15(2): 291–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F., and A. Zattoni. 2007. “Beyond the Black Box of Demography: Board Processes and Task Effectiveness within Italian Firms.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5): 852–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar