Organizational coupling in higher education institutions: challenges for university governance

References

• Aberbach, J., and Christensen, T. 2018. “Academic Autonomy and Freedom under Pressure: severely Limited, or Alive and Kicking?” Public Organization Review 18 (4):487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0394-2
   Google Scholar
• Acosta-Silva, A. 2014. “Gobierno Universitario y Comportamiento Institucional: la Experiencia Mexicana, 1990-2012.” Bordón 66 (1):31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta-Silva, A., F. Ganga-Contreras, and C. Rama-Vitale. 2021. “Gobernanza Universitaria: enfoques y Alcances Conceptuales.” Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior 12 (33):3–17. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2021.33.854
   Google Scholar
• Arango-Vasquez, L., and M. Gentilin. 2021. “Organizational Couplings: A Literature Review.” Innovar 31 (79):151–68. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n79.91898
   Google Scholar
• Baldridge, V. 1971. Models of University Governance: Bureaucratic, Collegial, and Political. Washington: Stanford University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED060825.
   Google Scholar
• Bratianu, C., and F. Pinzaru. 2015. “University Governance as a Strategic Driving Force.” Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, Military Academy, Lisbon, Portugal, 12-13 November 2015, pp.28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. 2010. “Burton Clark’s the Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective.” London Review of Education 8 (3):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.515122
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, J. J. 2011. “Gobernanza Universitaria, Tipología, Dinámicas y Tendencias.” Revista Educación 355:137–59.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, J. J., F. Ganga-Contreras, and E. Rodríguez-Ponce. 2018. “Gobernanza Del Capitalismo Académico: aproximaciones Desde Chile.” Revista Venezolana de Gerencia. 1:11–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, J. J. and F. Ganga-Contreras. 2016. “Dinámicas de Transformación En la Educación Superior Latinoamericana: Desafíos Para la Gobernanza.” Opción 32 (80):12–35.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W. 2014. “Changing Loosely Coupled Systems.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 50 (4):423–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314549923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., and E. Friedberg. 1990. El Actor y el Sistema. Las Restricciones de la Acción Colectiva. México: Alianza editorial Mexicana.
   Google Scholar
• De la Rosa, A., O. Lozano, and A. López. 2013. “El Pensamiento Estratégico: hacia Una Propuesta de Investigación En Los Estudios Organizacionales.” Revista Administración y Organizaciones 16 (30):19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dulzaides, M. E., and A. M. Molina. 2004. “Análisis Documental y de Información: dos Componentes de Un Mismo Proceso.” ACIMED 12 (2):1.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., B. Lanvin, and S. Wunch-Vincent. 2017. The Global Innovation Index. Innovation Feeding the World. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Donina, D., and S. Paleari. 2019. “New Public Management: global Reform Script or Conceptual Stretching? Analysis of University Governance Structures in the Napoleonic Administrative Tradition.” Higher Education 78 (2):193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin, C. O., A. Y. Landry, A. C. Livingston, and A. Dias. 2019. “Effective Governance and Hospital Boards Revisited: reflections on 25 Years of Research.” Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR 76 (2):131–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558718754898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estermann, T., E. B. Pruvot, and H. Stoyanova. 2021. Evolving Models of University Governance. The Governance Models of the European University Alliances. Bruselas: UEA
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., S. A. Musa, and R. S. Alkassim. 2016. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5 (1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2006. “Single-Outcome Studies: A Methodological Primer.” International Sociology 21 (5):707–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906067837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. La Presentación de la Persona En la Vida Cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G. 1981. “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries.” ECTJ 29 (2):75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, T., Helander, J. and Korhonen, V. 2021. “Administrative Structures of Higher Education Institutions - Connection with the Experience of Professional Agency of Teaching Staff.” International Journal of Leadership in Education :1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1937704
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, T., Helander, J. and Korhonen, V. 2018. “Loose and Tight Coupling in Educational Organization: An Integrative Literature Review.” Journal of Educational Administration 56 (2):236–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2017-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, M. y, and R. M. Soriano. 2004. “La Teoría de la Acción Social En Erving Goffman.” Revista Papers 73:59. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v73n0.1106
   Google Scholar
• Hökkä, P., and K. Vähäsantanen. 2014. “Agency-Centred Coupling—a Better Way to Manage an Educational Organization?” International Journal of Leadership in Education 17 (2):131–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.783932
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., and B. Stensaker. 2019. “From Organised Anarchy to de‐Coupled Bureaucracy: The Transformation of University Organisation.” Higher Education Quarterly 73 (4):456–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc, E., and D. Picard. 1992. La Interacción Social: cultura, Instituciones y Comunicación. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1976. “Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 84:765–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. D. 2002. “From “Loose Coupling” to “Tight Management”? Making Sense of the Changing Landscape in Management and Organization Theory.” Journal of Educational Administration 40 (6):515–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210454992
   Google Scholar
• Montaño, L. 2012. “La Organización Universitaria. Disputa y Tensiones Entre el Modelo Administrativo y la Anarquía Organizada.” Instituciones de Educación Superior, Políticas Públicas y Organización, edited by A. Barba, and O. Lobato. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. 1995. “The Significance of Saturation.” Qualitative Health Research 5 (2):147–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D., and K. E. Weick. 1990. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” The Academy of Management Review 15 (2):203–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/258154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E. 2018. “Loosely Coupled Systems of Innovation: Aligning Bim Adoption with Implementation in Dutch Construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering 34 (6):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, N. S. K. 2010. “Leadership Forces in Hong Kong Secondary Schools.” School Leadership & Management 30 (4):351–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2010.502525
   Google Scholar
• Parada, M. J., Gimeno, A., Samara, G. and Saris, W. 2020. “The Adoption of Governance Mechanisms in Family Businesses: An Institutional Lens.” Journal of Family Business Management :1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2019-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlo, C. 2006. “Aportes Del Interaccionismo Simbólico a Las Teorías de la Organización.” Invenio 9 (16):89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Pourtois, J. P., and H. Desmet. 1992. Epistemología e Instrumentación En Ciencias Humanas. Barcelona: Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Pruvot, B., and T. Estermann. 2018. “University Governance: Autonomy, Structures and Inclusiveness.” In European Higher Education Area: The Impact of past and Future Policies, edited by A. Curaj, L. Deca, and R. Pricopie. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_37
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, S. 2011. “The Director of Education as a Leader of Pedagogical Issues: A Study of Leadership in Municipal Educational Sector Activities.” School Leadership & Management 31 (5):471–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587405
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., X. Gao, and J. Xia. 2016. “School as a Loosely Coupled Organization? An Empirical Examination Using National SASS 2003–04 Data.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (4):657–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1923. El Conflicto de la Cultura Moderna, Reis. (89):315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Solís, P., and B. López. 2000. “El Concepto de Las Anarquías Organizadas En el Análisis Organizacional.” Contaduría y Administración 197:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 2007. Investigación Con Estudios de Casos, Cuarta Edición. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Trackamn, L. 2008. “Modelling University Governance.” Higher Education Quarterly 62 (1/2):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00384.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F., and H. de Boer. 2015. “Governance Models and Policy Instruments.” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance, edited by Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D., Souto-Otero, M. 38–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_3
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., J. Jones, H. Turunen, and S. Snelgrove. 2016. “Theme Development in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis.” Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 6 (5):100–10. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1976. “Educational Organisations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar