Study on the effect of manufacture parameters on the mechanical property of copper plate/magnetic column bonded structure using a parameter identification approach

References

• Dano, M. L.; Kamal, E.; Gendron, G. Analysis of Bolted Joints in Composite Laminates: Strains and Bearing Stiffness predictions[J]. Compos. Struct. 2007, 79(4), 562–570. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, M.-L.; Watts, J. F.; Digby, R. P. The Influence of Process Parameters on the Interfacial Chemistry of γ-gps on Aluminium: A review[J]. J. Adhes. 2004, 80(4), 291–312. DOI: 10.1080/00218460490430252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. X.; Shang, X. L.; Ju, S.; et al. Progress on Research on Composite-metal Adhesive joints[J]. Compos. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B.; Xu, F.; Ji, Z.; et al. Modified Semi-analytical Method for Adhesive Stress of Scarf Joints in Composite structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. 2015, 32(2), 526–533.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, Y. H.; Liu, B.; Han, X. F.; et al. Study on Modelling Precision of Composite and Metal Adhesive joints[J]. Comput. Simul. 2013, 30(4), 248–252.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J.; You, M.; Mei, C. Z. Effect of Curing Process of Epoxy Structural Adhesive on Performance of Adhesive Bonded joints[J]. Adhesion. 2012, 33(12), 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• He, X. C. Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Dynamic Response of Bonded Beams with a Single-lap joint[J]. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012, 37(6), 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.008.
   Google Scholar
• dos Reis, M. Q.; Banea, M. D.; Da Silva, L. F. M.; Carbas, R. J. C.; et al. Mechanical Characterization of a Modern Epoxy Adhesive for Automotive industry[J]. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41(8), 340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B.; Gao, N. Y.; Cao, S. H.; Ye, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Kikuchi, M.; et al. Interlaminar Toughening of Unidirectional CFRP with Multilayers Graphene and MWCNTs for Mode II fracture[J]. Compos. Struct. 2020, 236, 111888. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadigh, M.; Paygozar, B.; Da Silva, L. F. M.; et al. Creep Behaviour and Tensile Response of Adhesively Bonded Polyethylene Joints: Single-Lap and Double-Strap[J]. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2020, 34(21), 2352–2363.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-G, C. E.; Akhavan-Safar, A.; Da Silva, L. F. M.; Ayatollahi, M. R.; et al. On the Evaluation of a Critical Distance Approach for Failure Load Prediction of Adhesively Bonded Dissimilar materials[J]. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 2020, 32(6), 1647–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valipour, A.; Kargozarfard, M. H.; Rakhshi, M.; Yaghootian, A.; Sedighi, H. M. Metamaterials and Their Applications: An Overview. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L. 2021, 146442072199585. DOI: 10.1177/1464420721995858.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, F. C.; Li, Z. C.; Zhou, Y. J.; et al. Stress Distribution and Strength Prediction of Aluminium-magnesium Alloy Adhesive-bonded Single-lap joints[J]. J. Jilin Univ. 2015, 45(3), 726–732.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Z. D.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, T. T.; et al. Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of Composite Laminate Adhesively Bonded Single-lap joints[J]. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 2014, 40(12), 1786–1792.
   Google Scholar
• Borsellino, C.; Bella, G. D.; Ruisi, V. F. Adhesive Joining of Aluminium AA6082: The Effects of Resin and Surface treatment[J]. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29(1), 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, L. F. M.; Adams, R. D. Measurement of the Mechanical Properties of Structural Adhesives in Tension and Shear over a Wide Range of temperatures[J]. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2005, 19(2), 109–141. DOI: 10.1163/1568561053148449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancaktar, E.; Jozavi, H.; Klein, R. M. The Effects of Cure Temperature and Time on the Bulk Tensile Properties of a Structural Adhesive[J]. J. Adhes. 1983, 15(3–4), 241–264. DOI: 10.1080/00218468308073230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer, H.; Erbayrak, E. The Effects of Curing Temperature on Fracture Energy and Cohesive Parameters for the Adhesive Araldite 2015[J]. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2018, 32(12), 1287–1312. DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1410080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea, M. D.; Da Silva, L. F. M.; Campilho, R. D. S. G. Mode II Fracture Toughness of Adhesively Bonded Joints as a Function of Temperature: Experimental and Numerical Study[J]. J. Adhes. 2012, 88(4–6), 534–551. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2012.660835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, G. Y.; Liu, X. L.; Zheng, G.; Gong, Z.; Li, Q.; et al. On Fracture Characteristics of Adhesive Joints with Dissimilar materials – An Experimental Study Using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) Technique. Compos. Struct. 2018, 201, 1056–1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valoroso, N.; Fedele, R. Characterization of a Cohesive-zone Model Describing Damage and De-cohesion at Bonded Interfaces. Sensitivity Analysis and mode-I Parameter Identification. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2010, 47(13), 1666–1677. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argoul, P.; Benzarti, K.; Freddi, F.; Frémond, M.; Nguyen, T.-H. T. A Damage Model to Predict the Durability of Bonded Assemblies – Part II: Parameter Identification and Preliminary Results for Accelerated Ageing Tests. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25(2), 556–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.; El Hami, A.; Radi, B. Metamodel-based Inverse Method for Parameter Identification: Elastic–plastic Damage Model. Eng. Optim. 2016, 49(4), 633–653. DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2016.1206537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.; Bellet, M.; Bobadilla, M.; Shen, H.; Liu, B. Inverse Finite Element Modelling and Identification of Constitutive Parameters of UHS Steel Based on Gleeble Tensile Tests at High Temperature. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 2011, 19(4), 485–508. DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2010.518288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, X.; Chao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chao, Y.; Wu, C.; et al. Study on the Effect of Post Curing on the Mode II Fracture Energy of Structural Adhesive Using a Parameter Identification Approach. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 95, 102398. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D638-14. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics; ASTM international: West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D3434-99. Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Metal Joints; ASTM international: West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• de Moura, M. F. S. F.; de Morais, J.; Dourado, N. A New Data Reduction Scheme for Mode I Wood Fracture Characterization Using the Double Cantilever Beam test[J]. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2008, 75(13), 3852–3865. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moura, M. F. S. F.; Campilho, R.; Gonçalves, J. Crack Equivalent Concept Applied to the Fracture Characterization of Bonded Joints under Pure Mode I loading[J]. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 68(10-11, 2224–2230.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X.; Jin, Y.; Silva, L. F. M. D.; Costa, M.; Wu, C.; et al. On the Effect of Adhesive Thickness on Mode I Fracture Energy - an Experimental and Modelling Study Using a Trapezoidal Cohesive Zone model[J]. J. Adhes. 2020, 96(5), 490–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moura, M. F. S. F.; de Morais, A. B. Equivalent Crack Based Analyses of ENF and ELS tests[J]. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2008, 75(9), 2584–2596. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. X.; Ma, J. L.; Chen, Z. M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, P.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Han, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, C.; et al. Modelling Prediction on the Degradation in Mode II Fracture Energy of Structural Adhesive Subjected to Hygrothermal ageing[J]. J. Adhes. 2020, 1–23. DOI:10.1080/00218464.2020.1859374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar