References

• BBKA. (2006). Choosing an apiary site. www.bbka.org.uk/files/library/choosing_an_apiary_site_b11_1306865400.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beekman, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2000). Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. Functional Ecology, 14, 490–496.10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesmeijer, J. C., & Ermers, M. C. W. (1999). Social foraging in stingless bees: How colonies of Melipona fasciata choose among nectar sources. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 129–140.10.1007/s002650050602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbach, N., Laube, I., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Böhning-Gaese, K. (2010). Bird diversity and seed dispersal along a human land-use gradient: High seed removal in structurally simple farmland. Oecologia, 162, 965–976.10.1007/s00442-009-1547-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreck, N., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2013). Will neonicotinoid moratorium save the bees? Research Fortnight, 415, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Couvillon, M. J. (2012). The dance legacy of Karl von Frisch. Insectes Sociaux, 59, 297–306.10.1007/s00040-012-0224-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couvillon, M. J., Fensome, K. A., Quah, S. K. L., & Schürch, R. (2014). Summertime blues: August foraging leaves honey bees empty-handed. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 7, e28821.10.4161/cib.28821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couvillon, M. J., Schürch, R., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2014a). Dancing bees communicate a foraging preference for rural lands in high-level agri-environment schemes. Current Biology, 24, 1212–1215.10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couvillon, M. J., Schürch, R., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2014b). Waggle dance distances as integrative indicators of seasonal foraging challenges. PLoS ONE, 9, e93495.10.1371/journal.pone.0093495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees. Ecotoxicology, 20, 149–157.10.1007/s10646-010-0566-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEFRA. (2014). Land use on agricultural holdings on 1 June, 2014. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dornhaus, A., & Chittka, L. (1999). Insect behaviour: Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature, 401, 38–38.10.1038/43372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornhaus, A., & Chittka, L. (2001). Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): Possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 570–576.10.1007/s002650100395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. (2013). Commission implementing regulation (eu). In Commission, E. (Ed.) no 485/2013.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2012). Food outlook. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. M. (1987). The changing extent and conservation interest of lowland grasslands in England and Wales: A review of grassland surveys 1930–1984. Biological Conservation, 40, 281–300.10.1016/0006-3207(87)90121-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbuzov, M., Couvillon, M. J., Schürch, R., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2015). Honey bee dance decoding and pollen-load analysis show limited foraging on spring-flowering oilseed rape, a potential source of neonicotinoid contamination. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 203, 62–68.10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbuzov, M., Schürch, R., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2014). Eating locally: Dance decoding demonstrates that urban honey bees in Brighton, UK, forage mainly in the surrounding urban area. Urban Ecosystems, 18, 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. J., Ramos-Rodriguez, O., & Raine, N. E. (2012). Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature, 491, 105–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, R., Müller, M., Korner, P., Jenny, M., & Jenni, L. (2014). 20% loss of unimproved farmland in 22 years in the Engadin, Swiss Alps. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 185, 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, S., Williams, N., Winfree, R., & Kremen, C. (2007). Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia, 153, 589–596.10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M., Béguin, M., Requier, F., Rollin, O., Odoux, J.-F., Aupinel, P., … Decourtye, A. (2012). A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science, 336, 348–350.10.1126/science.1215039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzschuh, A., Dormann, C., Tscharntke, T., & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2013). Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance. Oecologia, 172, 477–484.10.1007/s00442-012-2515-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Goldewijk, C., & Battjes, J. (1997). A hundred year (1890–1990) database for integrated environmental assessments (HYDE, version 1.1). Bilthoven: National institute of public health and the environment (RIVM).
   Google Scholar
• Kluser, S., Neumann, P., Chauzat, M.-P., & Pettis, J. S. (2011). UNEP emerging issues: Global honey bee colony disorder and other threats to insect pollinators. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, M. E., Martin, A. P., Bishop, S., Osborne, J. L., Hale, R. J., Sanderson, R. A., & Goulson, D. (2005). An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1811–1820.10.1111/mec.2005.14.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2
   Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., … Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener, C. D. (2000). The bees of the world. Baltimore: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, K., Böttcher, U., Meyer-Schatz, F., & Kage, H. (2008). Analysis of vegetation indices derived from hyperspectral reflection measurements for estimating crop canopy parameters of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Biosystems Engineering, 101, 172–182.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. L., Clark, S. J., Morris, R. J., Williams, I. H., Riley, J. R., Smith, A. D., … Edwards, A. S. (1999). A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 519–533.10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. L., Martin, A. P., Shortall, C. R., Todd, A. D., Goulson, D., Knight, M. E., … Sanderson, R. A. (2008). Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 784–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathke, G. W., Christen, O., & Diepenbrock, W. (2005). Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research, 94, 103–113.10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2007). How far do honeybees forage? The Beekeepers Quarterly, 89, 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnieks, F. L. W., & Shackleton, K. (2015). Does the waggle dance help honey bees to forage at greater distances than expected for their body size? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedinger, V., Renner, M., Rundlöf, M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Holzschuh, A. (2014). Early mass-flowering crops mitigate pollinator dilution in late-flowering crops. Landscape Ecology, 29, 425–435.10.1007/s10980-013-9973-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. A., & Sutherland, W. J. (2002). Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 157–176.10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandrock, C., Tanadini, L. G., Pettis, J. S., Biesmeijer, J. C., Potts, S. G., & Neumann, P. (2014). Sublethal neonicotinoid insecticide exposure reduces solitary bee reproductive success. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 16, 119–128.10.1111/afe.2014.16.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Hempel, P. (1987). Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees I. Economic models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 209–218.10.2307/4810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Hempel, P., & Schmid-Hempel, R. (1987). Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees II. Response to factors determining nectar availability. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 219–227.10.2307/4811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeley, T. D. (1994). Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 51–62.10.1007/BF00175458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeley, T. D., Camazine, S., & Sneyd, J. (1991). Collective decision-making in honey bees: How colonies choose among nectar sources. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeley, T. D., & Visscher, P. K. (1985). Survival of honeybees in cold climates: The critical timing of colony growth and reproduction. Ecological Entomology, 10, 81–88.10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Frisch, K. (1946). Die Tänze der Bienen [The Dances of the Bees]. Österreichische Zoologische Zeitschrift, 1, 1–148.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, C., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Tscharntke, T. (2003). Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters, 6, 961–965.10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, C., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Tscharntke, T. (2009). Mass flowering oilseed rape improves early colony growth but not sexual reproduction of bumblebees. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 187–193.10.1111/jpe.2009.46.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, D. J., & Steven, M. D. (1987). Reflexion and absorption of solar radiation by flowering canopies of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 109, 495–502.10.1017/S0021859600081703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar