Neighborhood effects and honey bee foraging behavior

References

• Albrecht, M., Ramis, M. R., & Traveset, A. (2016). Pollinator-mediated impacts of alien invasive plants on the pollination of native plants: the role of spatial scale and distinct behaviour among pollinator guilds. Biological Invasions, 18(7), 1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1121-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avarguès-Weber, A., & Chittka, L. (2014). Local enhancement or stimulus enhancement? Bumblebee social learning results in a specific pattern of flower preference. Animal Behaviour, 97, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, P., Hines, J., Kaplan, I., Martinson, H., Szczepaniec, A., & Szendrei, Z. (2009). Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120242
   Google Scholar
• Baude, M., Dajoz, I., & Danchin, É. (2008). Inadvertent social information in foraging bumblebees: effects of flower distribution and implications for pollination. Animal Behaviour, 76(6), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baude, M., Danchin, É., Mugabo, M., & Dajoz, I. (2011). Conspecifics as informers and competitors: an experimental study in foraging bumble-bees. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 278(1719), 2806–2813. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesmeijer, J. C., Roberts, S. P. M., Reemer, M., Ohlemüller, R., Edwards, M., Peeters, T., Schaffers, A. P., Potts, S. G., Kleukers, R., Thomas, C. D., Settele, J., & Kunin, W. E. (2006). Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science (New York, NY), 313(5785), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
   Google Scholar
• Bruckman, D., & Campbell, D. R. (2014). Floral neighborhood influences pollinator assemblages and effective pollination in a native plant. Oecologia, 176(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3023-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckman, D., & Campbell, D. R. (2016). Pollination of a native plant changes with distance and density of invasive plants in a simulated biological invasion. American Journal of Botany, 103(8), 1458–1465. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, E., Tremblay, J., & Côté, S. D. (2016). Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory. Ecosphere, 7(6), e01371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1371
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. H., & Chittka, L. (2012). Conspecific and heterospecific information use in bumblebees. PLoS One, 7(2), e31444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. H., & Chittka, L. (2014). Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) use social information as an indicator of safety in dangerous environments. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 281(1785), 20133174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. S., Nielsen, M. E., Dornhaus, A., & Papaj, D. R. (2016). Foraging bumble bees weigh the reliability of personal and social information. Current Biology: CB, 26(9), 1195–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinsinger, P., Tiebout, H. M., & Young, B. E. (1991). Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology, 72(6), 1953–1963. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. W., & Free, J. B. (1979). Production of a forage-marking pheromone by the honeybee. Journal of Apicultural Research, 18(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1979.11099956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, S., Billiald, H., & Collier, R. H. (2003). Companion planting - do aromatic plants disrupt host-plant finding by the cabbage root fly and the onion fly more effectively than non-aromatic plants? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 109(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-8703.2003.00102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, G. M. (2017). Urbanization-mediated context dependence in the effect of floral neighborhood on pollinator visitation. Oecologia, 185(4), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3982-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free, J. B., & Williams, I. H. (1983). Scent-marking of flowers by honeybees. Journal of Apicultural Research, 22(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1983.11100564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Camacho, R., Méndez, M., & Escudero, A. (2009). Pollination context effects in the high-mountain dimorphic Armeria caespitosa (Plumbaginaceae): Neighborhood is something more than density. American Journal of Botany, 96(9), 1620–1626. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geslin, B., Baude, M., Mallard, F., & Dajoz, I. (2014). Effect of local spatial plant distribution and conspecific density on bumble bee foraging behaviour. Ecological Entomology, 39(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulson, D., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2008). Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüter, C., Leadbeater, E., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2010). Social learning: The importance of copying others. Current Biology: CB, 20(16), R683–R685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, P. G., & Orrock, J. L. (2016). Neighbor palatability generates associational effects by altering herbivore foraging behavior. Ecology, 97(8), 2103–2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, M. E., Franco, M., Dean, C. E., Franklin, E. L., Harris, H. R., Haynes, A. G., Rapson, S. R., Rowse, G., Thomas, K. C., Waterhouse, B. R., & Knight, M. E. (2011). Increased bumblebee abundance along the margins of a mass flowering crop: evidence for pollinator spill-over. Oikos, 120(11), 1618–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegland, S. J. (2014). Floral neighbourhood effects on pollination success in red clover are scale‐dependent. Functional Ecology, 28(3), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, E. I., & Roy, B. A. (2007). Context-dependent pollinator behavior: an explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of Indian Paintbrush. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 61(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00009.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horna Lowell, E. S., Morris, J. A., Vidal, M. C., Durso, C. S., & Murphy, S. M. (2019). The effect of conspecific cues on honey bee foraging behavior. Apidologie, 50(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00657-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horna Lowell, E. S. (2019). The effect of conspecific cues and neighborhood effects on bee foraging behavior [MS Thesis]. University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S. R., Avarguès-Weber, A., Garcia, J. E., Greentree, A. D., & Dyer, A. G. (2018). Numerical ordering of zero in honey bees. Science (New York, NY), 360(6393), 1124–1126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4975
   Google Scholar
• Hudewenz, A., & Klein, A.-M. (2015). Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment. Ecology and Evolution, 5(21), 5049–5056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. L., Ryan, M. J., & Chittka, L. (2015). The influence of past experience with flower reward quality on social learning in bumblebees. Animal Behaviour, 101, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi, L. G., Ohashi, K., & Toquenaga, Y. (2006). Do bumble bees save time when choosing novel flowers by following conspecifics? Functional Ecology, 20(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. N. (2017). How plant neighborhood composition influences herbivory: Testing four mechanisms of associational resistance and susceptibility. PLos One, 12(5), e0176499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro, A., Lundgren, R., & Totland, Ø. (2009). Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos, 118(5), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro, A., Lundgren, R., & Totland, Ø. (2014). Experimental reduction of pollinator visitation modifies plant-plant interactions for pollination. Oikos, 123(9), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro, A., & Totland, Ø. (2010). Population dependence in the interactions with neighbors for pollination: A field experiment with Taraxacum officinale. American Journal of Botany, 97(5), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Guigo, P., Rolier, A., & Le Corff, J. (2012). Plant neighborhood influences colonization of Brassicaceae by specialist and generalist aphids. Oecologia, 169(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2241-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, E., & Chittka, L. (2005). A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees? Current Biology: CB, 15(12), R447–R448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, E., & Chittka, L. (2007). Social learning in insects-from miniature brains to consensus building. Current Biology: CB, 17(16), R703–R713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, E., & Chittka, L. (2009). Bumble-bees learn the value of social cues through experience. Biology Letters, 5(3), 310–312. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, R. J., Lill, J. T., & Piccinni, A. (2002). Effect of plant architecture on colonization and damage by leaftying caterpillars of Quercus alba. Oikos, 99(3), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merwin, A. C., Underwood, N., & Inouye, B. D. (2017). Increased consumer density reduces the strength of neighborhood effects in a model system. Ecology, 98(11), 2904–2913. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesgaran, M. B., Bouhours, J., Lewis, M. A., & Cousens, R. D. (2017). How to be a good neighbour: Facilitation and competition between two co-flowering species. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 422, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero-Castaño, A., & Vilà, M. (2015). Direct and indirect influence of non-native neighbours on pollination and fruit production of a native plant. Plos One, 10(6), e0128595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, O., & Garibaldi, L. A. (2019). Impacts of honeybee density on crop yield: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(5), 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. (1983). Density-dependent pollinator foraging, flowering phenology, and temporal pollen dispersal patterns in Linanthus bicolor. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 37(6), 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiawan, N. N., Vanhellemont, M., Baeten, L., Dillen, M., & Verheyen, K. (2014). The effects of local neighbourhood diversity on pest and disease damage of trees in a young experimental forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 334, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Castellan, J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 88). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Slaa, E. J., & Hughes, O. H. (2009). Local enhancement, local inhibition, eavesdropping, and the parasitism of social insect communication. In Food exploitation by social insects: Ecological, behavioral, and theoretical approaches (pp. 147). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaa, E. J., Wassenberg, J., & Biesmeijer, J. C. (2003). The use of field-based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees. Ecological Entomology, 28(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, J. C., & Goulson, D. (2001). The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Animal Behaviour, 62(1), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1729
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, R. S., Banks, P. B., Dexter, N., & McArthur, C. (2015). Herbivore search behaviour drives associational plant refuge. Acta Oecologica, 67, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. A., & Whitham, T. G. (2000). Associational susceptibility of cottonwood to a Box Elder herbivore. Ecology, 81(7), 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1795:ASOCTA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, B. D., & Papaj, D. R. (2005). Flower choice copying in bumblebees. Biology Letters, 1(4), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Pan D, Teichroew J, An J (2016) The potential influence of bumble bee visitation on foraging behaviors and assemblages of honey bees on squash flowers in highland agricultural ecosystems. Plos One, 11(1) e0144590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144590
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Z.-M., Dai, W.-K., Jin, X.-F., Gituru, R. W., Wang, Q.-F., & Yang, C.-F. (2014). Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination: can pollinator abundance shift the plant–plant interactions? Plant Ecology, 215(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0274-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoi, T., & Fujisaki, K. (2011). To forage or not: Responses of bees to the presence of other bees on fowers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104(2), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A., Ieno, E., & Smith, E. (2007). Analyzing ecological data. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zuur, A., Ieno, E., & Walker, N. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer.
   Google Scholar