The problem of scale in the interpretation of pictorial representations of cell structure

References

• AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, T. W., D. Searles, H. Singer, and S. Cowan. 1990. “Learning Concepts from Biology Text through Pictorial Analogies and an Analogical Study Guide.” Journal of Educational Research 83 (4): 233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, T. W., H. Singer, and S. Cowan. 1985. “Analogical Study Guides: Improving Comprehension in Science.” Journal of Reading 29 (3): 246–250.
   Google Scholar
• Board of Studies NSW. 2009. Biology Stage 6 Syllabus. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Board of Studies NSW. 2012. Living World. http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/science/science-k10/content/984/
   Google Scholar
• Brewe, E., N. J. Pelaez, and T. J. Cooke. 2013. “From Vision to Change: Educational Initiatives and Research at the Intersection of Physics and Biology.” Cell Biology Education 12: 117–119.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R. 2006. “Learning from Text with Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model Development and Inference Generation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (1): 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellini, O. M., G. K. Walejko, C. E. Holladay, T. J. Theim, G. M. Zenner, and W. C. Crone. 2007. “Nanotechnology and the Public: Effectively Communicating Nanoscale Science and Engineering Concepts.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9: 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, J. L., D. Klahr, and K. Koedinger. 2007. “The Influence of Molecular Diagrams on Chemistry Learning.” Research on Learning and Instruction. pp. 1-4. http://oli.web.cmu.edu/openlearning/files/theinitiative/publications/davenportearli07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, C., S. Y. Stevens, N. Shin, M. L. Yunker, and J. S. Krajcik. 2007. The Development of Students’ Conceptions of Size. New Orleans, LA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Drane, D., S. Swarat, M. Hersam, G. Light, and T. Mason. 2008. “An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Transferability of a Nanoscience Module.” Journal of Nano Education 1 (1): 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, F., M. E. Tovar, and L. Gallegos. 2003. “Representation of the Cell and Its Processes in High School Students: An Integrated View.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (2): 269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., ed. 2005. Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. 1978. “Critical Barriers to Science Learning.” Outlook 29: 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Huk, T. 2006. “Who Benefits from Learning with 3D Models? The Case of Spatial Ability.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22: 392–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., T. Tretter, A. Taylor, and T. Oppewal. 2008. “Experienced and Novice Teachers’ Concepts of Spatial Scale.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (3): 409–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N., and O. Wolkenhauer. 2011. “Diagrams as Locality Aids for Explanation and Model Construction in Cell Biology.” Biology & Philosophy 27 (5): 705-721. doi 10.1007/s10539-012-9311-9
   Google Scholar
• Lazarowitz, R., and S. Penso. 1992. “High School Students’ Difficulties in Learning Biology Concepts.” Journal of Biological Education 26 (3): 215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J., A. Hind, and J. Ryder. 2003. “Designing and Evaluating Short Teaching Interventions about the Epistemology of Science in High School Science Classrooms.” Science Education 87 (6): 831–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C., S. W. Anderson, J. Dahl, M. Beilfuss, and W. Boone. 2005. “Qualitative Analysis of College Students’ Ideas about the Earth: Interviews and Open-Ended Questionnaires.” Journal of Geoscience Education 53 (1): 394–415.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. B. Anderson. 1991. “Animations Need Narrations: An Experimental Test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 484–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perini, L. 2012. “Diagrams in Biology.” In Form and Function: A Semiotic Analysis of Figures in Biology Textbooks, edited by N. Anderson and M. R. Dietrich, 235–254. Dartmouth, NH: Dartmouth College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2003. Seeing and Visualizing: It’s Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rundgren, C.-J., and L. A. E. Tibell. 2010. “Critical Features of Visualization of Transport through the Cell Membrane – An Empirical Study of Upper Secondary and Tertiary Students’ Meaning-Making of a Still Image and an Animation.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (2): 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheredos, B., D. C. Burnston, A. Abrahamsen, and W. Bechtel. 2012. “Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?” http://mechanism.ucsd.edu/~bill/teaching/F12/cs200/Readings/Why%20do%20biologists%20use%20so%20many%20diagrams.3.1.a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Storey, R. D. 1990. “Textbook Errors and Misconceptions in Biology.” The American Biology Teacher 52 (4): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., G. Light, E.-J. Park, and D. Drane. 2010. “A Typology of Undergraduate Students’ Conceptions of Size and Scale: Identifying and Characterizing Conceptual Variation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (5): 512–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topsakal, U. U. and J. Oversby. 2011. “Students’ Ideas About Diagrams of a Flower and a Plant Cell.” Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association. http://lsg.ucy.ac.cy/esera/e_book/base/strand3.html
   Google Scholar
• Topsakal, U. U., and J. Oversby. 2013. “What Do Scientist and Non-Scientist Teachers Notice about Biology Diagrams?” Journal of Biological Education 47 (1): 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T. R., M. G. Jones, T. Andre, A. Negishi, and J. Minogue. 2006. “Conceptual Boundaries and Distances: Students’ and Experts’ Concepts of the Scale of Scientific Phenomena.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (3): 282–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uesaka, Y., and E. Manalo. 2007. “Peer Instruction as a Way of Promoting Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems.” In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, edited by D. S. McNamara and J. G. Trafton, 677–682. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Vavra, K. L., V. Janjic-Watrich, K. Loerke, L. M. Phillips, P. Stephen, S. P. Norris, and J. Macnab. 2011. “Visualization in Science Education.” Ain Shams Engineering Journal 41 (1): 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-K., and P. Shah. 2004. “Exploring Visuospatial Thinking in Chemistry Learning.” Science Education 88 (3): 465–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar