Textbooks as a Possible Influence on Unscientific Ideas about Evolution

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and V. Akerson. 2007. “On the Role and Use of ‘Theory’ in Science Education Research: A Response to Johnson, Sutherland and Sowell.” Science Education 91 (1): 187–194.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abimbola, I., and S. Baba. 1996. “Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions in Science Textbooks: The Role of Teachers as Filters.” The American Biology Teacher 58 (1): 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anfara, V., and N. Mertz, eds. 2006. Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. 2000. The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
   Google Scholar
• Bardapurkar, A. 2008. “Do Students See the ‘Selection’ in Organic Evolution? A Critical Review of the Causal Structure of Student Explanations.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1 (3): 299–305.
   Google Scholar
• BouJaoude, S., J. Wiles, A. Asghar, and B. Alters. 2011. “Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese Students’ Conceptions of Biological Evolution.” Science & Education 20 (9): 895–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braterman, P., and J. Holbrook. 2009. “Putting Darwin in his Place: The Need to Watch Our Language.” The American Biology Teacher 71 (2): 84–88.10.1662/005.071.0207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. 2011. “The Major Metaphors of Evolution: Visualising the Extended Synthesis.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 4 (3): 446–452.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., J. Kahle, and F. Nordland. 1985. “An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions in Teaching Genetics.” Science Education 69 (5): 707–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobzhansky, T. 1973. “Nothing in Biology makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.” The American Biology Teacher 35 (3): 125–129.10.2307/4444260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J., N. Wallen, and H. Hyun. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Freyberg, P., and R. Osborne. 1985. “Assumptions about Teaching and Learning.” In Learning in Science: The Implications of Children’s Science, edited by R. Osborne and P. Freyberg, 82–90. Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. 2009. Evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associations.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, T. 2009. “Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 2 (2): 156–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T., and E. Torres. 1994. “The Textbook as Agent of Change.” ELT Journal 48 (4): 315–328.10.1093/elt/48.4.315
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and F. Finley. 1995. “Teaching Evolution using Historical Arguments in a Conceptual Change Strategy.” Science Education 79 (2): 147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Aleixandre, M. 1994. “Teaching Evolution and Natural Selection: A Look at Textbooks and Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (5): 519–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, T., and M. Sanders. 2013. “Use of Confidence Scales in Analysing Unscientific Ideas about Evolution among Religious Jewish Students.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17 (1–2): 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linhart, Y. 1997. “The Teaching of Evolution – We Need to Do Better.” BioScience 47 (6): 385–391.10.2307/1313153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. 2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and M. Huberman. 1994. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Molefe, L. 2013. “The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Life Sciences Teachers Teaching Evolution for the First Time.” Unpublished MSc research report, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., A. Froehle, J. Kiernan, and B. Greenwald. 2006. “How Biology Students in Minnesota View Evolution, the Teaching of Evolution, and the Evolution-creation Controversy.” The American Biology Teacher 68 (5): 35–42.10.1894/0038-4909(2006)68[e35:HBSIMV]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Nehm, R., T. Poole, M. Lyford, S. Hoskins, L. Carruth, B. Ewers, and P. Colberg. 2009. “Does the Segregation of Evolution in Biology Textbooks and Introductory Courses Reinforce Students’ Mental Models of Biology and Evolution?” Evolution: Education and Outreach 2 (3): 527–532.
   Google Scholar
• Nehm, R., M. Rector, and M. Ha. 2010. “Force-Talk” in Evolutionary Explanation: Metaphors and Misconceptions.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 3 (4): 605–613.
   Google Scholar
• Ngxola, N. 2012. “Teaching Evolution in a New Curriculum: Life Sciences Teachers Concerns and Needs.” Unpublished MSc research report, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ottevanger, W. 2001. “Teacher Support Materials as a Catalyst for Science Curriculum Implementation in Namibia.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, P. 2007. “The Evolution of Textbook Misconceptions about Darwin.” Journal of Biological Education 41 (2): 53–55.10.1080/00219266.2007.9656062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanek, D. 2008. Didaktikogenic Physics Misconceptions: Student Misconceptions Induced by Teachers and Textbooks. http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/miscon.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Soanes, C., and Stevenson, A. (2006). Concise Oxford English Dictionary. 11th rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S., E. Abrams, C. Cummins, and J. Anzelmo. 2001. “Understanding Students’ Explanations of Biological Phenomena: Conceptual Frameworks or P-prims?” Science & Education 85 (4): 328–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, L. 2004. “Effective Assessment: Probing Students’ Understanding of Natural Selection.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (1): 12–17.10.1080/00219266.2004.9655948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. 2008. “Use the Word Evolution.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1 (1): 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E., and T. Reydon. 2010. “A Conceptual Analysis of Evolutionary Theory for Teacher Education.” Science & Education 19 (6–8): 655–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor, A., and K. Wu. 1990. Textbooks and Educational Development. Educational and Employment Division, Population and Human Resources Department. The World Bank, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J., J. Mintzes, and J. Novak, 1994. “Research on Alternative Conceptions in Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, edited by D. Gabel, 177–210. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, A., and D. Elliott. 1987. “Evolution and Creationism in High School Textbooks.” The American Biology Teacher 49 (3): 164+166–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, T., and E. Marek. 2013. “Is Oklahoma Really OK? A Regional Study of the Prevalence of Biological Evolution-related Misconceptions Held by Introductory Biology Teachers.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 6: 1–20. doi:10.1186/1936-6434-6-6.
   Google Scholar