Student engagement in direct instruction, undergraduate microbiology laboratories

References

• Agus, H. 2010. “Significance of Laboratory Experience in Undergraduate Microbiology.” Microbiology Australia 31 (1): 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. 2011. “The Role Biomedical Science Laboratories Can Play in Improving Science Knowledge and Promoting First-Year Nursing Academic Success.” Doctoral diss., The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD.
   Google Scholar
• Ateh, C. M., and A. Charpentier. 2014. “Sustaining Student Engagement in Learning Science.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 87 (6): 259–263.10.1080/00098655.2014.954981
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, R. S., G. Hedberg, A. Greenberg, and T. McKay. 2015. “the Climate Experiences of Students in Introductory Biology.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 16 (2): 138–147.10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K. 2012. “The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Chemistry Labs on Student Engagement.” Master Thesis, Carroll University.
   Google Scholar
• Birks, M., N. Ralph, R. Cant, E. Hillman, and Y. C. Tie. 2015. “Teaching Science Content in Nursing Programs in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Academics.” Biomed Central Nursing 14 (1): 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen, E. R. 2003. “Student Engagement and Its Relation to Quality Work Design: A Review of the Literature.” Action Research Exchange 2 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., M. J. Kloser, T. Fukami, and R. Shavelson. 2012. ‘Undergraduate Biology Lab Courses: Comparing the Impact of Traditionally Based “Cookbook” and Authentic Research-Based Courses on Student Lab Experiences.’ Journal of College Science Teaching 41 (4): 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie. 2012. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Ciscell, G. 2007. “The REaL Factor: How Relevance and Learning Combine to Create Student Engagement in the Classroom.” Doctoral diss., Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, T. D., R. B. Bucat, and D. Spagnoli. 2017. “First Year Introductory Chemistry at the University of Western Australia: Reflections and Perceptions.” Australian Journal of Chemistry 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M., and T. S. Kerns. 2006. “Changing the Laboratory: Effects of a Laboratory Course on Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions.” Journal of Chemical Education 83 (9): 1356–1361.10.1021/ed083p1356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. L., M. D. Simpson, W. Letts, and H. Cavanagh. 2015. “Re-Thinking Microbiology/Infection Control Education to Enhance the Practice-Readiness of Health Professional Students: More than Just a Curriculum Issue.” Journal of Learning Design 8 (1): 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. M. 2010. “What is Provided and What the Registered Nurse Needs—Bioscience Learning through the Pre-Registration Curriculum.” Nurse Education Today 30 (8): 707–712.10.1016/j.nedt.2010.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decarlo, C. 1990. “What Happens during High School Chemistry Laboratory Sessions? A Descriptive Case Study of the Behaviours, Practices, and Perceptions of Three High School Chemistry Teachers and Their Students.” Doctoral diss., The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Domin, D. S. 1999. “A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (4): 543–547.10.1021/ed076p543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drayton, B., G. Puttick, and M. Donovan. 2013. Under the Microscope: Review of the Research on Biological Lab Experiences 1897–2007: A Research White Paper. Cambridge, MA: TERG.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. P.. 2005. Psychology of Learning for Instruction. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., L. A. Curry, and J. W. Creswell. 2013. “Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs-Principles and Practices.” Health Services Research 48 (6): 2134–2156.10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109.10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiewski, J. A., M. K. Eagan, G. A. Garcia, S. Hurtado, and M. J. Chang. 2012. From Gate Keeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses. Research in Higher Education 53 (2): 229–261.10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, H. M. 2011. “The Student Experience in Traditional and Inquiry-Based Chemistry Labs.” Master Thesis, Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Harbour, K. E., L. L. Evanovich, C. A. Sweigart, and L. E. Hughes. 2015. “A Brief Review of Effective Teaching Practices That Maximize Student Engagement.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 59 (1): 5–13.10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 1982. “The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.” Review of Educational Research 52 (2): 201–217.10.3102/00346543052002201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick. 2006. “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice.” Field Methods 18 (1): 3–20.10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., and C. Case. 2013. Laboratory Experiments in Microbiology. 10th ed. San Francisco: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Karataş, F. Ö. 2016. “Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Competencies in the Laboratory: A Cross-Grade Study in Solution Preparation.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17 (1): 100–110.10.1039/C5RP00147A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., T. Van der Touw, L. Spowart, and C. Lawlor. 2016. “A Scoping Study Investigating Student Perceptions towards Inquiry Based Learning in the Laboratory.” European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4 (3): 305–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, W. C., J. E. Penick, and J. A. Shymansky. 1979. “Assessing and Analyzing the Performance of Students in College Science Laboratories.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 16 (6): 545–551.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• Lane, E. S., and S. E. Harris. 2015. “A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioural Engagement in Large University Classes.” Journal of College Science Teaching 44 (6): 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, T. R., and T. Orkwiszewski. 2006. “Moving from Didactic to Inquiry-Based Instruction in a Science Laboratory.” The American Biology Teacher 68 (6): 342–345.10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[342:DTIIIA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and G. B. Rossman. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, R. 2010. “A Comparative Study of Verbal Discourse Practices in Traditional and Inquiry-Based Undergraduate Biology Labs for Non-Science Majors.” Educational Research and Reviews 5 (10): 604–617.
   Google Scholar
• Olave, M. 2013. “Assessing Student Perspectives of the Laboratory, Self-Efficacy in Chemistry, and Attitudes towards Science in an Undergraduate First-Semester General Chemistry Laboratory.” Master’s thesis, California State University, Fullerton.
   Google Scholar
• Olitsky, S., and C. Milne. 2012. “Understanding Engagement in Science Education: The Psychological and the Social.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry Fraser, Kenneth Tobin and Campbell J. McRobbie, 19–33. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
   Google Scholar
• Platova, E., and M. Walpuski. 2013. “Improvement and Evaluation of Laboratory Work for First-Semester Teacher Students.” In E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research for Evidence-Based Teaching and Coherence in Learning Part 3: 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Prowse, M. A., and P. A. Lyne. 2002. “Revealing the Contribution of Bioscience Based Nursing Knowledge to Clinically Effective Patient Care.” Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 4 (2): 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Puttick, G., B. Drayton, and E. Cohen. 2015. “A Study of the Literature on Lab-Based Instruction in Biology.” The American Biology Teacher 77 (1): 12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatt, K., and R. Sims. 2007. “Learner Performance and Attitudes in Traditional versus Simulated Laboratory Experiences.” Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 870–879.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. R. 2012. “An Evaluation of Community College Student Perceptions of the Science Laboratory and Attitudes towards Science in an Introductory Biology Course.” Doctoral diss., The University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. B., and G. Weaver. 2008. “Student Perceptions of the Purpose and Function of the Laboratory in Science: A Grounded Theory Study.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., A. Puig, and B. K. Trutschel. 2011. “Laboratory Instructional Practices Inventory: A Tool for Assessing the Transformation of Undergraduate Laboratory Instruction.” Journal of College Science Teaching 41 (1): 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., J. M. Rosenberg, and P. N. Beymer. 2018. “A Person-in-Context Approach to Student Engagement in Science: Examining Learning Activities and Choice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (1): 19–43.10.1002/tea.21409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., M. L. Hilton, and H. A. Schweingruber, eds. 2006. America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. D., and J. E. Armstrong. 1993. “The Status of Laboratory Instruction for Introductory Biology in U.S. Universities.” The American Biology Teacher 55 (3): 144–146.10.2307/4449610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, H., and T. R. Lord. 2004. “Traditional and Constructivist Teaching Techniques.” Journal of College Science Teaching 34 (3): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachelam, C., and R. W. Rudolph. 1974. “Cookbook versus Creative Chemistry: A New Approach to Research-Oriented General Chemistry Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 51 (7): 479–482.10.1021/ed051p479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar