The impact of semester-long authentic research on student experiences

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2015. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: Chronicling Change, Inspiring the Future. Washington, DC: AAAS. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/files/2015/07/VISchange2015_webFin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P., and L. K. Hall. 2005. “The Importance of Retrieval Failures to Long-term Retention: A Metacognitive Explanation of the Spacing Effect.” Journal of Memory and Language 52 (4): 566–577. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., P. Ayres, and F. Paas. 2015. “Animations Showing Lego Manipulative Tasks: Three Potential Moderators of Effectiveness.” Computers & Education 85: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CATME Smarter Teamwork. 2018. catme.org
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A. J., O. R. Aragón, X. Chen, B. A. Couch, M. F. Durham, A. Bobrownicki, … M. J. Graham. 2016. “Student Buy-In to Active Learning in a College Science Course.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (4): ar76. doi:10.1187/cbe.16–07–0212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, J., and R. Atwood. 2006. Interdisciplinary Curriculum Planning in a College Course. In Reform in Undergraduate Science Teaching for the 21st Century, 123–136. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dopico, E., A. R. Linde, and E. Garcia-Vazquez. 2014. “Learning Gains in Lab Practices: Teach Science Doing Science.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (1): 46–52. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.801874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrberg, N. R., A. H. Treusch, and C. Wiegand. 2017. “Virtual Laboratories in Science Education: Students’ Motivation and Experiences in Two Tertiary Biology Courses.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (4): 358–374. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., and K. A. Hogan. 2014. “Getting under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (3): 453–468. doi:10.1187/cbe.14–03–0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornsaglio, J., and Z. Sheffler 2015. “Cell Biology Laboratory.” https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/cell-biology-laboratory/id842833018?mt=11
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D., E. S. Pietri, G. Anderson, K. Moyano-Camihort, and M. J. Graham. 2015. “Increased Preclass Preparation Underlies Student Outcome Improvement in the Flipped Classroom.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 14 (4): ar36. doi:10.1187/cbe.15–02–0040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., J. Frederick, B. Fotinakes, and S. A. Strobel. 2012. “Linguistic Analysis of Project Ownership for Undergraduate Research Experiences.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 11 (4): 378–385. doi:10.1187/cbe.12–04–0043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, E., K. Nomme, T. Deane, C. Pollock, and G. Birol. 2016. “Investigating the Role of an Inquiry-based Biology Lab Course on Student Attitudes and Views toward Science.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15 (4). doi:10.1187/cbe.14–11–0203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046–z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarowitz, J., and P. Pamir. 1994. “Research on Using Laboratory Instruction in Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching, edited by D. L. Gabel. pp. 94-128. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, T., and T. Orkwiszewski. 2006. “Moving from Didactic to Inquiry-based Instruction in a Science Laboratory.” American Biology Teacher 68 (6): 342–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldarelli, G. A., E. M. Hartmann, P. J. Cummings, R. D. Horner, K. M. Obom, R. Shingles, and R. S. Pearlman. 2009. “Virtual Lab Demonstrations Improve Students’ Mastery of Basic Biology Laboratory Techniques.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 10 (1): 51–57. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v10.99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murthy, P. P. N., M. Thompson, and K. Hungwe. 2014. “Development of a Semester-long, Inquiry-based Laboratory Course in Upper-level Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.” Journal of Chemical Education 91 (11): 1909–1917. doi:10.1021/ed400119u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2003. Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10024.
   Google Scholar
• Partin, M. L., and J. J. Haney. 2012. “The CLEM Model: Path Analysis of the Mediating Effects of Attitudes and Motivational Beliefs on the Relationship between Perceived Learning Environment and Course Performance in an Undergraduate Non-major Biology Course.” Learning Environments Research 15 (1): 103–123. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9102–x.
   Google Scholar
• Peffer, M., and M. Renken. 2016. “Practical Strategies for Collaboration across Discipline-based Education Research and the Learning Sciences.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15 (4). doi:10.1187/cbe.15–12–0252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M., S. O. Farmer, K. McQueen, and J. A. Grissom. 2015. “Teacher Collaboration in Instructional Teams and Student Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (3): 475–514. doi:10.3102/0002831215585562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S., R. Pedwell, G. Lawrie, and P. Worthy. 2016. Developing and Resourcing Academics to Help Students Conduct and Communicate Undergraduate Research on a Large Scale. Final Report 2016. Sydney, Australia: Office for Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., D. Wiese, A. Hunter, and S. Daffinrud 2000. “Creating a Better Mousetrap:On-line Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains.” Presented at the American Chemical Society Symposium: Using Real-World Questions to Promote Active Learning, San Francisco, CA. http://www.salgsite.org/docs/SALGPaperPresentationAtACS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., M. C. Makel, and P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says about the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two Second-order Meta-analyses.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899. doi:10.3102/0034654316675417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, A. E., and A. M. O’Donnell. 2009. “The Contribution of a Virtual Biology Laboratory to College Students’ Learning.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (4): 405–419. doi:10.1080/14703290903301735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weld, J., S. J. Heard, and C. Rogers. 2001. “Semester-length Field Investigations in Undergraduate Animal Behavior and Ecology Courses: Making the Laboratory the Linchpin of Science Education.” In Practicing Science: The Investigative Approach to Teaching College Science, edited by Beth Daniels. 34–38. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and Y. J. Dori. 2003. “Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 145–181. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar