References
- Acher, A., and R. M. Pujol. 2003. “Cognitive Strategies in the Interpretation of the Development of Living Beings at Pre-primary School Level.” Paper presented at the ESERA conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, August.
- Aldhebiani, A. Y. 2018. “Species Concept and Speciation.” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 25 (3): 437–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.04.013.
- Allmon, W. D., and R. M. Ross. 2018. “Evolutionary Remnants as Widely Accessible Evidence for Evolution: The Structure of the Argument for Application to Evolution Education.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 11 (1): 1–12.
- Baker, R. J., and R. D. Bradley. 2006. “Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept.” Journal of Mammalogy 87 (4): 643–662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1.
- Barman, C. R., M. Stein, N. S. Barman, and S. McNair. 2003. “Students Ideas about Plants: Results from a National Study.” Science and Children 41 (1): 46–51.
- Barnett, G. A., and J. Woelfel. 1988. Readings in the Galileo System: Theory, Methods and Applications. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Pub.
- Bebbington, A. 2005. “The Ability of A-level Students to Name Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (2): 63–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963.
- Brandes, U. 2005. Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Brigandt, I. 2013. “Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims.” Science & Education 22 (1): 69–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9350-7.
- Butterfield, H. 1965. The Whig Interpretation of History. New York, US: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Bzovy, J. 2016. “Species Pluralism: Conceptual, Ontological, and Practical Dimensions.” Doctoral dissertation. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4309/
- Catley, K. M. 2006. “Darwin’s Missing Link—A Novel Paradigm for Evolution Education.” Science Education 90 (5): 767–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
- Chang, H. S. 2011. “How Historical Experiments Can Improve Scientific Knowledge and Science Education: The Cases of Boiling Water and Electrochemistry.” Science & Education 20 (3–4): 317–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9301-8.
- Chang, H. S. 2014. “Pluralism as a New Framework for Integrated HPS.” The Korean Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2): 153–173.
- Chang, H. S. 2017. “Who Cares about the History of Science?” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 71 (1): 91–107.
- Claridge, M. F., H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson. 1997. Species: The Units of Biodiversity. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
- Clauset, A., M. E. Newman, and C. Moore. 2004. “Finding Community Structure in Very Large Networks.” Physical Review E 70 (6): 66–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111.
- Coleman, K. A., and E. O. Wiley. 2001. “On Species Individualism: A New Defense of the Species-as-individuals Hypothesis.” Philosophy of Science 68 (4): 498–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/392939.
- Colombo, M. 2013. “Introduction. Pluralism in Education and Implications for Analysis.” Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 5 (2): 1–16.
- Cracraft, J. 2000. “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences.” In Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, edited by Q. D. Wheeler and R. Meier, 3–14. New York, US: Columbia University Press.
- Crane, J. K. 2004. “On the Metaphysics of Species.” Philosophy of Science 71 (2): 156–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/383009.
- Cronquist, A. 1978. “Once Again, What Is a Species?” In Biosystematics in Agriculture, edited by J. A. Ramberger, 3–20. Monclair, NJ: Allanheld and Osmun.
- diSessa, A. A. 1993. “Toward an Epistemology of Physics.” Cognition and Instruction 10 (2–3): 105–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008.
- diSessa, A. A. 2013. “A Bird’s-eye View of The” Pieces” Vs” Coherence” Controversy (From The” Pieces” Side of the Fence”).” In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou, 31–48. London, UK: Routledge.
- Dobzhansky, T. 1937. “Genetic Nature of Species Differences.” The American Naturalist 71 (735): 404–420.
- Drieger, P. 2013. “Semantic Network Analysis as a Method for Visual Text Analytics.” Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences 79: 4–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053.
- Ereshefsky, M. 2010. “Darwin’s Solution to the Species Problem.” Synthese 175 (3): 405–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9538-4.
- Erétéo, G., F. Gandon, O. Corby, and M. Buffa. 2009. “Semantic Social Network Analysis.” In Web Science. Athens, Greece.
- Ferlin, M., and P. Sundberg. 2015. “Grundskoleelevers Uppfattningar Om Begreppet Art Relaterade till Formuleringar I Läroböcker I Biologi 12 to 15 Year Old Pupils’ Perceptions of the Concept Species Related to Formulations in Textbooks in Biology.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 11 (1): 3–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.805.
- Freeman, L. C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.” Sociometry 40 (1): 35–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543.
- Gaston, K. J., and J. I. Spicer. 2004. Biodiversity: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell publishing.
- Ghiselin, M. T. 1974. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Biology 23 (4): 536–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/23.4.536.
- González-Forero, M. 2009. “Removing Ambiguity from the Biological Species Concept.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 256 (1): 76–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.016.
- Goodman, R. B. 2012. “William James’s Pluralisms.” Revue Internationale De Philosophie 260 (2): 155–176.
- Grunspan, D. Z., B. L. Wiggins, and S. M. Goodreau. 2014. “Understanding Classrooms through Social Network Analysis: A Primer for Social Network Analysis in Education Research.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 13 (2): 167–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0162.
- Ha, M., R. H. Nehm, M. Urban-Lurain, and J. E. Merrill. 2011. “Applying Computerized-scoring Models of Written Biological Explanations across Courses and Colleges: Prospects and Limitations.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 10 (4): 379–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-08-0081.
- Hammer, D. 1996. “Misconceptions or P-prims: How May Alternative Perspectives of Cognitive Structure Influence Instructional Perceptions and Intentions.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 5 (2): 97–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1.
- Hausdorf, B. 2011. “Progress toward a General Species Concept.” Evolution 65 (4): 923–931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.2011.65.issue-4.
- Hey, J. 2001a. “The Mind of the Species Problem.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 (7): 326–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02145-0.
- Hey, J. 2001b. Genes, Categories, and Species. The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Hey, J. 2006. “On the Failure of Modern Species Concepts.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (8): 447–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.011.
- Hörandl, E. 1998. “Species Concepts in Agamic Complexes: Applications in the Ranunculus Auricomus Complex and General Perspectives.” Folia Geobotanica 33 (3): 335–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216210.
- Hoser, B., A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. 2006. “Semantic Network Analysis of Ontologies.” In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, edited by Y. Sure and J. Domingue, 514–529. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Hull, D. L. 1976. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25 (2): 174–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2412744.
- Irzik, G., and R. Nola. 2011. “A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education.” Science & Education 20 (7–8): 591–607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4.
- Jardine, N. 1969. “A Logical Basis for Biological Classification.” Systematic Biology 18 (1): 37–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/18.1.37.
- Kuhn, T. S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Illinois, US: University of Chicago Press.
- Lee, J. K., M. Ha, and S. Shin. 2019. “Exploring the High School Students’ Perception of Relationships among History of Science, Science, and History: Focus on ‘history of Science’ in the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum.” Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 39 (5): 627–638.
- Mallet, J. 2001. “Species, Concepts Of.” Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 5: 427–440.
- Mayden, R. L. 1997. “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem.” In Species: The Unit of Diversity, edited by M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, 381–423. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
- Mayden, R. L. 2002. “On Biological Species, Species Concepts and Individuation in the Natural World.” Fish and Fisheries 3: 171–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00086.x.
- Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York, US: Columbia University Press.
- Mayr, E. 1953. “Concepts of Classification and Nomenclature in Higher Organisms and Microorganisms.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 56 (3): 391–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.1953.56.issue-3.
- Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, US: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Mayr, E. 1996. “What Is a Species, and What Is Not?” Philosophy of Science 63 (2): 262–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/289912.
- Mayr, E. 1997. This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, US: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Mishler, B. D., and M. J. Donoghue. 1982. “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism.” Systematic Zoology 31 (4): 491–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2413371.
- Nehm, R. H., and M. Ha. 2011. “Item Feature Effects in Evolution Assessment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (3): 237–256.
- Nyléhn, J., and M. Ødegaard. 2018. “The “Species” Concept as a Gateway to Nature of Science.” Science & Education 27 (7–8): 685–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0007-7.
- Opfer, J. E., R. H. Nehm, and M. Ha. 2012. “Cognitive Foundations for Science Assessment Design: Knowing What Students Know about Evolution.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (6): 744–777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.v49.6.
- Pardede, S. 2017. “Understanding meaning-making of diversity: education students’ experience of a 10 day intensive programme.” Unpublished masters’ thesis. University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
- Pigliucci, M. 2003. “Species as Family Resemblance Concepts: The (Dis‐) Solution of the Species Problem?” BioEssays 25 (6): 596–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-1878.
- Richards, R. A. 2010. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
- Richards, R. A. 2016. Biological Classification: A Philosophical Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Rieppel, O. 2009. “Species as a Process.” Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1–2): 33–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9057-6.
- Schussler, E. E., and L. A. Olzak. 2008. “It’s Not Easy Being Green: Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123.
- Setiyowati, A. J., H. Indreswari, and I. M. Simon. 2018. “Analyzing Classroom Diversity and Its Contribution to Multicultural Education in Indonesia.” Advance in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research 285: 11–15.
- Shim, J., C. Park, and M. Wilding. 2015. “Identifying Policy Frames through Semantic Network Analysis: An Examination of Nuclear Energy Policy across Six Countries.” Policy Sciences 48 (1): 51–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9211-3.
- Shome, S. (2013). “Exploring Students’ Understanding of Species: A Study with Class VIII Students.” In Proceedings of epiSTEME–5, edited by G. Nagarjuna, A. Jamakhandi, and E. M. Sam, 158–164. Mumbai, India: HBCSE, TIFR. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412466985.
- Steyvers, M., and J. B. Tenenbaum. 2005. “The Large‐scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth.” Cognitive Science 29 (1): 41–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3.
- Subramani. 1989. “Education for Pluralistic World.” Journal of Educational Studies 11 (1): 19–26.
- van Weelie, D., and A. Wals. 2002. “Making Biodiversity Meaningful through Environmental Education.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (11): 1143–1156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134839.
- Velasco, J. D. 2008. “Species Concepts Should Not Conflict with Evolutionary History, but Often Do.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4): 407–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.09.007.
- Vosniadou, S., and W. F. Brewer. 1992. “Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood.” Cognitive Psychology 24 (4): 535–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.
- Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 8. New York, US: Cambridge university press.
- Wellman, H. M., and S. A. Gelman. 1992. “Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories of Core Domains.” Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1): 337–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005.
- Wilkins, J. S. 2009. Defining Species: A Sourcebook from Antiquity to Today. New York, US: Peter Lang.
- Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
- Zachos, F. E. 2016. Species Concepts in Biology. Vol. 801. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.