Artificial selection of maize as a bridging case to teach natural selection: a simulation proposal

References

• Banet, E., and E. Ayuso. 2000. “Teaching Genetics at Secondary School: A Strategy for Teaching about the Location of Inheritance Information.” Science Education 88 (3): 313–351.
   Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L., and H. Deniz. 2018. “Evolution Education around the Globe: Conclusions and Future Directions.” In Evolution Education around the Globe, edited by L. Borgerding and H. Deniz. 463-464. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, T., and K. Macmillan. 2005. “Encouraging Conceptual Change: The Use of Bridging Analogies in the Teaching of Action–Reaction Forces and the ‘at Rest’ Condition in Physics.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 737–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC, Commission for Environmental Cooperation 2004. “Maize and Biodiversity.” http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/2152-maize-and-biodiversity-effects-transgenic-maize-in-mexico-key-findings-and-es.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. 1993. “Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Intuitions to Deal with Students’ Preconceptions in Physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (10): 1241–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R. 1991. “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science.” Science Education 75 (6): 649–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E., and K. Rosengren. 2018. “Cognitive Biases or Cognitive Bridges? Intuitive Reasoning in Biology.” Chap. 2 In Teaching Biology in Schools. Global Research, Issues, and Trends, edited by K. Kampourakis and M. Reiss. 9-21. New York, NY. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. 2009. Evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gettner, D., and A. Markman. 1997. “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity.” American Psychologist 52 (1): 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez Galindo, A. A., A. García Franco, L. Gónzalez, and J. C. Torres Frías. 2019. “Cultural Diversity and Evolution: Looking for a Dialogical Teaching Perspective.” In Evolution Education Re-considered, edited by C. U. Harms and M. J. Reiss, 227–248. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. 2009. “Artificial Selection and Domestication: Modern Lessons for Darwin´s Enduring Analogy.” Evolution, Education and Outreach 2 (1): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, D. 2002. “The Place of Analogies in Science Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 32 (2): 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs-McDaniels, N., E. Maine, R. Albertson, and J. Wiles. 2013. “Using Model Organisms in an Undergraduate Laboratory to Link Genotype, Phenotype, and the Environment.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (1): 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2014. “An Introduction to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by C. Jewitt, 15–30. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. 2014. Understanding Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 1994. The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teaching for African-American Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. 1994. The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. 1998. This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., and R. Land. 2005. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education 49 (3): 373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues da Silva, P., M. Bologna, and A. M. Andrade. 2015. “Biology Teachers’ Conceptions of the Diversity of Life and the Historical Development of Evolutionary Concepts.” Journal of Biological Education 49 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickel, A., and P. Friedrichsen. 2013. “Examining the Evolution Education Literature with a Focus on Teachers: Major Findings, Goals for Teacher Preparation, and Directions for Future Research.” Evolution, Education and Outreach 6: 23. URL: http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/23/
   Google Scholar
• Stamos, D. N. 2008. Evolution and the Big Questions. Sex, Race and Other Matters. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., and R. Maclin. 1990. “Representing Genotype-phenotype Mappings.” Journal of Biological Education 24 (2): 113–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. 1993. “The Evolution of an Approach for Using Analogies in Teaching and Learning Science.” Research in Science Education 23: 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G., and L. Bryer. 2002. “Analogies.” In Dilemmas of Science Teaching. Perspectives on Problems of Practices, edited by J. Wallace and W. Louden, 162–163. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar