246
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Revisiting the landscape roaming metaphor to understand students’ ideas on mammals’ and birds’ thermal regulation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bailey, J. K., S. C. Wooley, R. L. Lindroth, and T. G. Whitham. 2006. “Importance of Species Interactions to Community Heritability: A Genetic Basis to Trophic-level Interactions.” Ecology Letters 9 (1): 78–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00844.x.
  • Barak, J., M. Gorodetsky, and D. Chipman. 1997. “Understanding of Energy in Biology and Vitalistic Conceptions.” International Journal of Science Education 19 (1): 21–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190102.
  • Chabalengula, V. M., M. Sanders, and F. Mumba. 2012. “Diagnosing Students’ Understanding of Energy And.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (2): 241–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9291-2.
  • Doménech, J. L., R. Limiñana, and A. Menargues. 2013. “La superficialidad en la enseñanza del concepto de energía: Una causa del limitado aprendizaje alcanzado por los estudiantes de bachillerato.” Enseñanza de Las Ciencias 3: 103–119.
  • Domínguez, J. M., A. De Pro Bueno, and E. García-Rodeja. 1998. “Las partículas de la materia y su utilización en el campo conceptual de calor y temperatura: un estudio transversal.” Enseñanza de Las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas 16 (3): 461–476.
  • Duit, R. 1986. “In Search of an Energy Concept.” In Energy Matters, Proceedings of an Invited Conference. Teaching about Energy with the Secondary Science Curriculum, edited by R. Driver and R. Millar, 67–101. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
  • Duschl, R., S. Maeng, and A. Sezen. 2011. “Learning Progressions and Teaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis.” Studies in Science Education 47 (2): 123–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476.
  • Hafez, E. S. E. 1964. “Behavioral Thermoregulation in Mammals and Birds.” International Journal of Biometeorology 7 (3): 231–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187455.
  • Hernández, M. I., D. Couso, and R. Pintó. 2015. “Analyzing Students’ Learning Progressions Throughout a Teaching Sequence on Acoustic Properties of Materials with a Model-Based Inquiry Approach.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (2–3): 356–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9503-y.
  • McNeill, K. L., and J. Krajcik. 2009. “Synergy between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-specific and Domain-general Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 18 (3): 416–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488.
  • Millar, R. 2005. “Teaching about Energy.” Department of Educational Studies, Research Paper, 11. York: University of York.
  • Neumann, K., T. Viering, W. J. Boone, and H. E. Fischer. 2013. “Towards a Learning Progression of Energy.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (2): 162–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21061.
  • Ogborn, J. 1986. “Energy and Fuel –the Meaning of «the Go of Things».” In Energy Matters, Proceedings of an Invited Conference. Teaching about Energy with the Secondary Science Curriculum, edited by R. Driver and R. Millar, 59–66. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
  • Patiño, J. F. 2006. Metabolismo, nutrición y shock. Bogotá: Editorial Medica Internacional Ltda.
  • Pérez, M., A. Marbà, and M. Izquierdo. 2016. “How Energy Is Conceptualized in Biology Units?” Ensenanza de Las Ciencias 34 (1): 73–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1292.
  • Wernecke, U., K. Schütte, J. Schwanewedel, and U. Harms. 2018. “Enhancing Conceptual Knowledge of Energy in Biology with Incorrect Representations.” CBE Life Sciences Education 17 (1): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0133.
  • Windschitl, M., J. Thompson, and M. Braaten. 2008. “Beyond the Scientific Method : Model-Based Inquiry as a New Paradigm of Preference for School Science Investigations.” Science education, 92(5): 941–967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259.
  • Zabel, J., and H. Gropengiesser. 2011. “Learning Progress in Evolution Theory: Climbing a Ladder or Roaming a Landscape?” Journal of Biological Education 45 (3): 143–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.586714.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.