Using animations to support student learning in undergraduate physiology

References

• Ainsworth, S., V. Prain, and R. Tytler. 2011. “Drawing to Learn in Science.” Science 333 (6046): 1096–1097. doi:10.1126/science.1204153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., T. Ashkar, and Y. J. Dori. 2011. “Learning Science via Animated Movies: Its Effect on Students’ Thinking and Motivation.” Computers & Education 56 (3): 839–846. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2015. “Writing up Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research for Diverse Audiences.” The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry 296–313.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2018. “‘‘Mixed Methods in My Bones”: Transcending the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 10 (1): 334–341. doi:10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a22.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, E., S. Gedye, and S. Richardson. 2016. “‘Am I Employable?’: Understanding Students’ Employability Confidence and Their Perceived Barriers to Gaining Employment.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 19: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., K. A. R. Lauricella, and E. Wartella. “Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education.“ Computers & Education 77 (2014): 82–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, P., and C. J. Heinrich. 2015. Mixed Methods for Policy Research and Program Evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, C. C., L. C. Tien, and L. T. Lee. 2015. “Effects on Learning of Multimedia Animation Combined with Multidimensional Concept Maps.” Computers & Education 80: 211–223. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. 2016. “The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (2): 231–259. doi:10.1177/0049124115570065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S., J. Mullan, and P. Feldman. 2017. Rebooting Learning for the Digital Age: What Next for Technology-Enhanced Higher Education? Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, T. 2004. “Animating to Build Higher Cognitive Understanding: A Model for Studying Multimedia Effectiveness in Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (1): 59–64. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00788.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falloon, G. 2017. “Mobile Devices and Apps as Scaffolds to Science Learning in the Primary Classroom.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (6): 613–628. doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9702-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2008. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2008. “Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology?” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. M., and L. L. Jones. 2007. “Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (5): 413–429. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9065-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, P. S., and M. B. Parshall. 2000. “Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research.” Qualitative Health Research 10: 293–308. doi:10.1177/104973200129118453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., and P. Elms. 2019. “Animating Student Engagement: The Impacts of Cartoon Instructional Videos on Learning Experience.” Research in Learning Technology 27. doi:10.25304/rlt.v27.2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., K. Wilson, and R. Simons. 2002. “University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for Theory and Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 27–52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. B. Anderson. 1992. “The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (4): 444. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., and J. Aldridge. 2019. “Weaving an Interpretivist Stance Throughout Mixed Methods Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 42 (3): 225–238. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peart, D. J., P. L. Rumbold, K. M. Keane, and L. Allin. 2017. “Student Use and Perception of Technology Enhanced Learning in a Mass Lecture Knowledge-rich Domain First Year Undergraduate Module.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14 (1): 40. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0078-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peart, D. J., S. Johnstone, J. Brown, and P. Bangani. 2014. “Supporting Teaching and Learning in Biosciences with Mobile Technology: Staff and Student Perspectives.” The Journal of Research in Higher and Further Education 2 (1): 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sala Ripoll, C., R. Oparka, A. Campbell, and C. Erolin. 2017. “The Cell Cycle: Development of an eLearning Animation.” Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 40 (1): 13–20. doi:10.1080/17453054.2017.1289059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. J., D. M. Brecheisen, and B. M. Hynek. 2001. “Can Computer Animations Affect College Biology Students‘ Conceptions about Diffusion & Osmosis?” The American Biology Teacher 63 (2): 104–109. doi:10.2307/4451051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., L. B. Cardinal, and R. M. Burton. 2017. “Research Design for Mixed Methods.” Organizational Research Methods 20 (2): 243–267. doi:10.1177/1094428115610808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uerz, D., M. Volman, and M. Kral. 2018. “Teacher Educators’ Competences in Fostering Student Teachers’ Proficiency in Teaching and Learning with Technology: An Overview of Relevant Research Literature.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicsek, L. 2010. “Issues in the Analysis of Focus Groups: Generalisability, Quantifiability, Treatment of Context and Quotations.” Qualitative Report 15 (1): 122–141.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., C. H. Jen, C. Y. Chang, and T. K. Yeh. 2018. “Comparison of Animation and Static-picture Based Instruction: Effects on Performance and Cognitive Load for Learning Genetics.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21 (4): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, T. K., H. M. Huang, W. P. Chan, and C. Y. Chang. 2016. “Effects of Congruence between Preferred and Perceived Learning Environments in Nursing Education in Taiwan: A Cross-sectional Study.” BMJ Open 6 (5): e009925. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar