Solving a problem about cancer treatment: how does the use of the mitotic spindle model evolve during small group discussions?

References

• Bravo-Torija, B., and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2017. “Developing an Initial Learning Progression for the Use of Evidence in Decision-making Contexts.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (4): 619–638. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9803-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C. 2019. “Using the Science Talk–writing Heuristic to Build a New Era of Scientific Literacy.” The Reading Teacher 73 (1): 51–64. doi:10.1002/trtr.1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnici, J. P., J. W. Yue, and K. M. Torres. 2004. “Students as ‘Human Chromosomes’ in Role-Playing Mitosis and Meiosis.” The American Biology Teacher 66 (1): 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. C., and P. M. Mathis. 2000. “Modeling Mitosis and Meiosis: A Problem-solving Activity.” The American Biology Teacher 62 (3): 204–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmenli, M. 2010. “Misconceptions of Cell Division Held by Student Teachers in Biology: A Drawing Analysis.” Scientific Research and Essays 5 (2): 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domènech, J. 2016. “Drug Research: Una Secuencia Contextualizada De Indagación Sobre Mitosis, Cáncer Y Creación Del Conocimiento Científico [Drug Research: A Contextualized Sequence of Inquiry on Mitosis, Cancer and the Creation of Scientific Knowledge].” Investigación En La Escuela 88: 93–111. doi:10.12795/IE.2016.i88.06.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel-Martin, T. E., J. M. Pérez-Martín, and B. Bravo-Torija. 2021. “The Use of Storytelling to Promote Literacy Skills in Biology Education: An Intervention Proposal.” In Interdisciplinary Approaches Toward Enhancing Teacher Education, edited by M. D. Ramírez-Verdugo and B. Otcu-Grillman, 155–177. USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel-Martin, T. E., J. M. Pérez-Martín, B. Bravo-Torija, and N. Sánchez. 2019. “A Model-based Learning about Mitosis: The Role of Mitotic Spindle through Digital Storytelling.” Communication presented at the 13th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). Bologna, Italy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Npkkgs
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., and J. Osborne. 2013. “Exploring Young Students’ Collaborative Argumentation within a Socioscientific Issue.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (2): 209–237. doi:10.1002/tea.21076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, M. D. M., and M. P. Jiménez-Tejada. 2018. “Difficulties Learning about the Cell. Expectations Vs. Reality.” Journal of Biological Education 53 (3): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. “Discourse Analysis: What Makes It Critical?” In An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, edited by R. Rogers, 23–45. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hulse, R. A. 2006. “Preparing K-12 Students for the New Interdisciplinary World of Science.” Experimental Biology and Medicine 231 (7): 1192–1196. doi:10.1177/153537020623100704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and C. Reigosa. 2006. “Contextualizing Practices across Epistemic Levels in the Chemistry Laboratory.” Science Education 90 (4): 707–733. doi:10.1002/sce.20132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., M. Linn, and J. E. Roseman. 2008. Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy. New York, USA: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalimuthu, I. 2017. “Improving Understanding and Reducing Secondary School Students’ Misconceptions about Cell Division Using Animation-based Instruction.” In Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science, edited by M. Karpudewan, A. Nurulazam, and A. L. Chandrasegaran, 283–306. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and A. Takao. 2002. “Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analysis of University Oceanography Students’ Use of Evidence in Writing.” Science Education 86 (3): 314–342. doi:10.1002/sce.10024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindfield, A. C. H. 1991. “Confusing Chromosome Number and Structure: A Common Student Error.” Journal of Biological Education 25 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1080/00219266.1991.9655206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koichu, B. 2008. “On Considerations of Parsimony in Mathematical Problem Solving.” In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, and A. Sepulova, 273–280. Morelia, Mexico: Cinvestav-UMSNH.
   Google Scholar
• Kyburz-Graber, R. 2004. “Does Case-study Methodology Lack Rigour? the Need for Quality Criteria for Sound Case-study, as Illustrated by a Recent Case in Secondary and Higher Education.” Environmental Education Research 10 (1): 53–65. doi:10.1080/1350462032000173706.
   Google Scholar
• Mengascini, A. 2006. “Propuesta Didáctica Y Dificultades Para El Aprendizaje De La Organización Celular [Didactic Proposal and Difficulties for the Learning of the Cellular Organization].” Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias 3 (3): 485–495. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2006.v3.i3.09.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, K. J., and J. Y. Yowler. 2019. “Which Way Is Better? Comparison of Two Interactive Modeling Approaches for Teaching Meiosis in an Introductory Undergraduate Biology Course.” The American Biology Teacher 81 (2): 98–109. doi:10.1525/abt.2019.81.2.98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcos, L., and Á. A. Magreñán. 2018. “The Hologram as a Teaching Medium for the Acquisition of STEM Contents.” International Journal of Learning Technology 13 (2): 163–177. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2018.092097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztap, H., E. Özay, and F. Öztap. 2003. “Teaching Cell Division to Secondary School Students: An Investigation of Difficulties Experienced by Turkish Teachers: Case Studies.” Journal of Biological Education 38 (1): 13–15. doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Martín, J. M., P. Fernández-Freire, V. Labrador, and M. J. Hazen. 2008. “Carbamazepine Induces Mitotic Arrest in Mammalian Vero Cells.” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 637 (1–2): 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemeier, T., and H. Gropengießer. 2008. “On the Roots of Difficulties in Learning about Cell Division: Process-based Analysis of Students’ Conceptual Development in Teaching Experiments.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (7): 923–939. doi:10.1080/09500690701294716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D. 2012. “Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts.” Educational Psychology Review 24 (3): 355–367. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Decree 1105/2014. 2015. “Establishing the Basic Curriculum for Secondary Education and High School.” State Official Newsletter 3. Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Shelden, E. A., E. G. Offerdahl, and G. T. Johnson. 2019. “A Virtual Laboratory on Cell Division Using A Publicly-Available Image Database”. Retrieved from 10.24918/cs.2019.15
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, R. P., M. C. P. Knippels, M. G. Gilissen, and K. T. Boersma. 2018. “The Theoretical Nature of Systems Thinking. Perspectives on Systems Thinking in Biology Education.” Frontiers in Education 3: 1–11. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00040.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., A. H. DeBarger, B. L. Montgomery, X. Zhou, and E. Tate. 2012. “Exploring Middle School Students’ Conceptions of the Relationship between Genetic Inheritance and Cell Division.” Science Education 96 (1): 78–103. doi:10.1002/sce.20465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakışan, M. 2013. “The Alternative Conceptions of Pre-service Teachers Concerning the Status of Organelles during Cell Division.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12 (6): 813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar