Designer considerations and processes in developing school-based citizen-science curricula for environmental education

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkaher, I., and D. Gan. 2020. “The Role of School Partnerships in Promoting Education for Sustainability and Social Capital.” The Journal of Environmental Education51(6) 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Author references blinded.
   Google Scholar
• Barstow, D. (1997). The Richness of Two Cultures. In National Conference on Student & Scientist Partnerships, 33–37. Cambridge, MA: TERC and Concord Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and J. Holman. 2002. “Context-based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and What are Their Effects?.” In Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, edited by J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, and J. H. Van Driel, 165–184. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bismack, A. S., A. M. Arias, E. A. Davis, and A. S. Palincsar. 2015. “Examining Student Work for Evidence of Teacher Uptake of Educative Curriculum Materials.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (6): 816–846. doi:10.1002/tea.21220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., and J. L. Dickinson. 2012. “Overview of Citizen Science.” In Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, edited by J. L. Dickinson and R. Bonney, 19–26. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., H. Ballard, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, T. Phillips, J. Shirk, and C. C. Wilderman (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., T. Phillips, H. L. Ballard, and J. W. Enck. 2015. “Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science?.” Public Understanding of Science25(1) 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherif, A. H. 1992. “Barriers to Ecology Education in North American High Schools: Another Alternative Perspective.” The Journal of Environmental Education 23 (3): 36–46. doi:10.1080/00958964.1992.9942800.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and C. Dede. 2009. “Design for Scalability : A Case Study of the River City Curriculum.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 18 (4): 353–365. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9156-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., A. S. Palincsar, A. M. Arias, A. S. Bismack, A. M. Marulis, and S. K. Iwashyna. 2014. “Designing Educative Curriculum Materials: A Theoretically and Empirically Driven Process.” Harvard Educational Review 84 (1): 24–53. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.g48488u230616264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci, İ., and İ. Karteri. 2020. “Context-Based Learning Supported by Environmental Measurement Devices in Science Teacher Education: A Mixed Method Research.” Journal of Biological Education 1–26. doi:10.1080/00219266.2020.1821083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., and R. Bonney. 2012. “Introduction: Why Citizen Science. 1-14.” In Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, edited by J. L. Dickinson and R. Bonney, 1–14. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doubler, S. J. (1997). Two-way Partnerships: An Introduction to SSPs. In National Conference on Student &Scientist Partnerships, 23–26. Cambridge, MA: TERC and Concord Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Drayton, B., and J. Falk. 2006. “Dimensions that Shape Teacher-scientist Collaborations for Teacher Enhancement.” Science Education 90 (4): 734–761. doi:10.1002/sce.20138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. 2002. “Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 (1): 105–121. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., and B. J. Reiser. 2006. “Making Authentic Practices Accessible to Learners: Design Challenges and Strategies.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 335–354. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., D. N. Gordin, and R. D. Pea. 1999. “Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-based Learning through Technology and Curriculum Design.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 8 (3–4): 391–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, N. 2005. “Learning Physics in Context: A Study of Student Learning about Electricity and Magnetism.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (10): 1187–1209. doi:10.1080/09500690500069491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, A. W., and Y. Ko. 2019. “Barriers and Opportunities for Climate Change Education: The Case of Dallas-Fort Worth in Texas.” The Journal of Environmental Education 50 (3): 145–159. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1604479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). “On the Nature of „Context“ in Chemical Education„. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2006. “On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 957–976. doi:10.1080/09500690600702470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., A. M. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.493185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J., M. Klein, and K. Tye. 1979. “The Domains of Curriculum and Their Study.” In Curriculum Inquiry: The Study of Curriculum Practice, edited by J. Goodlad, 43–76. Associates. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S. A., K. Nicosia, and R. C. Jordan. 2012. “Lessons Learned from Citizen-science in the Classroom.” Democracy & Education 20 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. 1981. “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries.” Educational Communication and Technology 29 (2): 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K. L., and R. Branch. 2002. Survey of Instructional Design Models. 4th ed. Syracuse University: ERIC Clearninghouse on Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Harlin, J., L. Kloetzer, D. Patton, and C. Leonhard, Leysin American School high school students. 2018. “Turning Students into Citizen Scientists.” In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, edited by S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowse, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn, 410–428. UCL Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist Olander, M., and C. Olander. 2017. “Understandings of Climate Change Articulated by Swedish Secondary School Students.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (4): 349–357. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1233130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseal, A. K., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and L. Destefano. 2014. “Impact of a Student-teacher-scientist Partnership on Students’ and Teachers’ Content Knowledge, Attitudes toward Science, and Pedagogical Practices.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 84–115. doi:10.1002/tea.21126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D., E. Boling, G. Rowland, and K. M. Smith. 2012. “Instructional Design Cases and Why We Need Them.” Educational Technology 52 (3): 34.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. C., J. G. Ehrenfeld, S. A. Gray, W. R. Brooks, D. V. Howe, and C. E. Hmelo-Silver. 2012. “Cognitive Considerations in the Development of Citizen Science Projects.” In Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, edited by J. L. Dickinson and R. Bonney, 167–178. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen-Finan, J., M. Scheuch, and S. Winter. 2018. “Contributions from Citizen Science to Science Education: An Examination of a Biodiversity Citizen Science project with Schools in Central Europe.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (17): 2078–2098. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gary, J., Holbrook, J., & Ryan, M. (2003). “Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle School Science Classroom: Putting Learning By Design into practice.„ Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., K. L. McNeill, and B. J. Reiser. 2008. “Learning-goals-driven Design Model: Developing Curriculum Materials that Align with National Standards and Incorporate Project-based Pedagogy.” Science Education 92 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1002/sce.20240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits, and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research(2nd Ed.). London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C. A., J. Broo, B. J. MacFadden, and S. Moran. 2016. “Not Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth: Exploring the Merits of a Student–teacher–scientist Partnership.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1028571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Marx, R. W. (2006). “Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials.„ ,Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C., R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves. 2019. “Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 791–812. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, K., R. Hattam, and C. B. Daniels. 2015. “Two Models for Implementing Citizen Science Projects in Middle School.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 14 (2): 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareja-Roblin, N. P., Schunn, C., & McKenney, S. 2018. “What Are Critical Features of Science Curriculum Materials that Impact Student and Teacher Outcomes?„ .Science Education, 102(2), 260–282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, T., N. Porticella, M. Constas, and R. Bonney. 2018. “A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 3 (2): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Pilot, A., and A. M. W. Bulte. 2006. “The Use of “Contexts” as a Challenge for the Chemistry Curriculum: Its Successes and the Need for Further Development and Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1087–1112. doi:10.1080/09500690600730737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). “Achieving Standards in Urban Systemic Reform: An Example of a Sixth Grade Project-Based Science Curriculum„. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669–692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. E. 2012. “Context-based Learning.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N. Seel, 799–802. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., C. F. Herrmann-Abell, and M. Koppal. 2017. “Designing for the Next Generation Science Standards: Educative Curriculum Materials and Measures of Teacher Knowledge.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 28 (1): 111–141. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2016.1277598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. T. 2006. “Contextualized Chemistry Education: The American Experience.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 977–998. doi:10.1080/09500690600702488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, H. R., and L. R. Martinez. 2016. “Current Approaches in Implementing Citizen Science in the Classroom.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 17 (1): 17–22. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B. 2006. “BioKids: An Animated Conversation on the Development of Curricular Activity Structures for Inquiry Science.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 355–369. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Schunn, C. 2015.“ A Framework for Analyzing Cognitive Demand and Content-Practices Integration: Task Analysis Guide in Science„. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 659–685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Globe Program. (n.d.). Retrieved on from 20 May 2019, https://www.globe.gov/do-globe/classroom-ready-activities/learning-activities
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, A., and J. van den Akker. 2009. Curriculum in Development. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, N. M., J. Shirk, J. Fee, and M. E. Krasny. 2012. “Who Poses the Question? Using Citizen Science to Help K–12 Teachers Meet the Mandate for Inquiry.” In Citizen Science: Public Collaboration in Environmental Research, edited by J. L. Dickinson and R. Bonney, 179–190. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., O. Noroozi, H. J. Biemans, and M. Mulder. 2019. “The Effects of an Online Learning Environment with Worked Examples and Peer Feedback on Students’ Argumentative Essay Writing and Domain-specific Knowledge Acquisition in the Field of Biotechnology.” Journal of Biological Education 53 (4): 390–398. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. 2003. “Curriculum Perspectives: An Introduction.” In Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, edited by J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer, 1–10. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., F. Paas, and J. J. Merriënboer. 2004. “Process-oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance through Enhanced Understandings.” Instructional Science 32 (1/2): 83–98. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021810.70784.b0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, .
   Google Scholar
• Yu, K. C., S. C. Fan, and K. Y. Lin. 2015. “Enhancing Students’ Problem-solving Skills through Context-based Learning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (6): 1377–1401. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., C. T. Forbes, and M. Biggers. 2013. “Fostering Student Sense Making in Elementary Science Learning Environments: Elementary Teachers’ Use of Science Curriculum Materials to Promote Explanation Construction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (8): 989–1017. doi:10.1002/tea.21104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoellick, B., S. J. Nelson, and M. Schauffler. 2012. “Participatory Science and Education: Bringing Both Views into Focus.” Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 10 (6): 310–313. Citizen Science – new pathways to public involvement in research. doi:10.1890/110277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar