Drawing our garden’s insects: a didactic sequence to improve pre-service teachers’ knowledge and appreciation of insect diversity

References

• Andersson, B., F. Bach, M. Hagman, C. Olander, and A. Wallin. 2005. “Discussing a Research Programme for the Improvement of Science Teaching.” In Research and the Quality of Science Education, edited by K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, and H. Eijkelhof, 221–230, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 1992. “Didactic Engineering.” Recherche en didactique des mathématiques 13 (3): 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Askerlund, P., and E. Almers. 2016. “Forest Gardens – New Opportunities for Urban Children to Understand and Develop Relationships with Other Organisms.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 187–197. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow, L. H. 2002. “What Do Elementary Students Know about Insects?” Journal of Elementary Science Education 14 (2): 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF03173848.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, B., D. E. Breedlove, and P. H. Raven. 1973. “General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology.” American Anthropologist 75 (1): 214–242. doi:10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixler, R. D., and M. F. Floyd. 1999. “Hands on or Hands Off? Disgust Sensitivity and Preference for Environmental Education Activities.” The Journal of Environmental Education 30 (3): 4–11. doi:10.1080/00958969909601871.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. H., M. Shepard, and M. M. Allen. 2001. “Endangered Invertebrates: The Case for Greater Attention to Invertebrate Conservation.” Endangered Species Update 18 (2): 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, G. B., J. Schlegel, P. Kauf, and R. Rupf. 2015. “The Importance of Being Colorful and Able to Fly: Interpretation and Implications of Children’s Statements on Selected Insects and Other Invertebrates.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (2): 664–2,687. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1099171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. N., E. H. Carpenter, E. M. Thoms, and S. T. Cotty. 1984. “Public Attitudes toward Urban Arthropods.” Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 30 (2): 40–44. doi:10.1093/besa/30.2.40.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, N. 2017. “Appropriate Integration of Children’s Drawing in the Acquisition of Science Concepts.” In Drawing for Science Education. An International Perspective, edited by E. Katz, 135–145, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. Y., T. J. Lin, M. H. Lee, S. Wen-Yu Lee, T. C. Lin, A. L. Tan, and C. C. Tsai. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Trends and Findings in Research Employing Drawing Assessment in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 56 (1): 77–110. doi:10.1080/03057267.2020.1735822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. D. 2009. Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World. 2nd ed. Toowoomba, Australia: Australian Biological Resources Study.
   Google Scholar
• Cinici, A. 2013. “From Caterpillar to Butterfly: A Window for Looking into Students’ Ideas about Life Cycle and Life Forms of Insects.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (2): 84–95. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.773361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., J. Confrey, A. diSessa, R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble. 2003. “Design Experiments in Educational.” Research. Educational Researcher 32 (1): 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. M., E. M. McTigue, and L. B. Smolkin. 2011. “Elementary Teachers’ Use of Graphical Representations in Science Teaching.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22 (7): 613–643. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1.
   Google Scholar
• Couso, D. 2012. “Las Secuencias Didácticas En la Enseñanza Y El Aprendizaje de Las Ciencias: Modelos Para Su Diseño Y Validación. [Didactic Sequences in Science Teaching and Learning: Models for Their Design and Validation.” In Didáctica de la Física y la Química, edited by A. Caamaño (Coord.), 57–83, Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Drer, J., H. Haase, and K. Hille. 2010. “Short-term Environmental education—does It Work?—an Evaluation of the ‘Green Classroom’.” Journal of Biological Education 44 (4): 149–155. doi:10.1080/00219266.2010.9656215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2012. Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. New York: Penguin Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlén, K. 2009. “Drawings as Representations of Children’s Conceptions.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/09500690701630455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 2002. The Arts and the Creation of Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eugenio-Gozalbo, M., L. Aragón, and I. Ortega-Cubero. 2020. “Gardens as Science Learning Contexts across Educational Stages: Learning Assessment Based on Students’ Graphic Representations.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 2226. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugenio-Gozalbo, M., L. Monferrer, I. Ortega-Cubero, and M. Adelantado. in press. “In press. “¿escuchas Un Zumbido?” Una SEA Para El Estudio de Los Polinizadores Con Maestros En Formación Inicial En El Contexto Del Huerto Ecodidáctico Universitario. [“can You Hear A Buzzing?” A teaching-learning Sequence for the Study of Pollinators with pre-service Teachers in the Context of the University Organic Learning Garden].” Accepted on 24^th may 2022 by Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 1985. “Science for All.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 17 (4): 415–435. doi:10.1080/0022027850170407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., and R. E. Mayer. 2016. “Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 28 (4): 717–741. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., and Q. Zhang. 2018. “Drawing Boundary Conditions for Learning by Drawing.” Educational Phsychology Review 30 (3): 1115–1137. doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9444-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Maltese, C., and T. D. Zimmerman. 2015. “A Garden-Based Approach to Teaching Life Science Produces Shifts in Students’ Attitudes toward the Environment.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10 (1): 51–66. doi:10.12973/ijese.2015.230a.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston, K. J., and J. I. Spicer. 2004. Biodiversity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes, A. B. M., G. M. Uhla, and G. W. Alpers. 2009. “Spiders are Special: Fear and Disgust Evoked by Pictures of Arthropods.” Evolution and Human Behaviour 30 (1): 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., A. M. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2010. “Concept Development and Transfer in context-science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.493185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giné, N., and A. Parcerisa. 2003. “Fases de la Secuencia Formativa. [Phases of the Formative Sequence.” In Planificación y análisis de la práctica educativa, edited by N. Giné and A. Parcerissa, 35–45, Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Giordan, A., and G. de Vecchi. 1988. Los Orígenes Del Saber: De Las Concepciones Personales a Los Conceptos Científicos. [The Origins of Knowledge: From Personal Conceptions to Scientific Concepts]. Sevilla: Díada editoras
   Google Scholar
• Golick, D. A., and T. M. Heng-Moss. 2013. “Insects as Educational Tools: An Online Course Teaching the Use of Insects as Instructional Tools.” American Entomologist 9 (3): 183–187. doi:10.1093/ae/59.3.183.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Prado, B., B. Puig, and M. Evagorou. 2020. “Primary pre-service Teachers’ Emotions and Interest Towards Insects: An Explorative Case Study.” Journal of Biological Education 1–16. doi:10.1080/00219266.2020.1756896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J., K. Zuza, J. Ametller, and J. Gutiérrez-Berraondo. 2017. “Evaluating and Redisigning Teaching Learning Sequences at the Introductory Physics Level.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 13 (2): 020139. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J., and J. M. Oliva. 2020. “Nueva sección especial de REurEDC sobre investigación basada en el diseño de secuencias de enseñanza [New special section of REurEDC on design-based reserach].” Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 17 (3): 3001. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, E., and C. Randler. 2012. “Living Animals in the Classroom: A meta-analysis on Learning Outcome and A treatment-control Study Focusing on Knowledge and Motivation.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (1): 95–105. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9285-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, E., C. Randler, and P. Prokop. 2012. “Practical Work at School Reduces Rejection and Fear of Unpopular Animals.” Society and Animals 20 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1163/156853012X614369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Ed. 2017. Drawing for Science Education: An International Perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 1993. “Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates.” Conservation Biology 7 (4): 845–855. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 2002. “Experiencing Nature: Affective, Cognitive and Evaluative Development in Children.” In Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations, edited by P. H. Kahn and S. R. Kellert, 117–151, London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J., and P. Scott. 2002. “Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning.” Studies in Science Education 38 (1): 115–142. doi:10.1080/03057260208560189.
   Google Scholar
• Lemelin, R. H., R. W. Harper, J. Dampier, R. Bowles, and D. Balika. 2016. “Humans, Insects and Their Interaction: A multi-faceted Analysis.” Animal Studies Journal 5: 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2006. “Investigating Nature on the Way to School: Responses to an Educational Programme by Teachers and Their Pupils.” International Journal of Science Education 2 (8): 895–918. doi:10.1080/10670560500438396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2022. “The Influence of an Educational Program on Children’s Perception of Biodiversity”. The Journal of Environmental Education 33: 22–31. doi:10.1080/00958960209600805.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. 2013. The Infested Mind: Why Humans Fear, Loathe, and Love Insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V., and W. L. Brittain. 1985. Desarrollo de la capacidad creadora. Editorial Kapelusz. Buenos Aires: Development of creativity.
   Google Scholar
• Luquet, G. H., and J. Depouilly. 1981. El dibujo infantil. Editorial Médica y Técnica. Barcelona: Children’s drawing.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, I. M., and M. G. Gelder. 1966. “Different Ages of Onset in Varieties of Phobia.” American Journal of Psychiatry 123 (2): 218–221. doi:10.1176/ajp.123.2.218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L. M. 2004. Arte y símbolo en la infancia: Un cambio de mirada. Barcelona: Octaedro.
   Google Scholar
• Méheut, M., and D. Psillos. 2004. “Teaching–Learning Sequences: Aims and Tools for Science. Guest Editors: Martine Méheut and Dimitris Psillos.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (5): 515–535. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, J., and J. Osborne. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Moline, S. 2012. I See What You Mean: Visual Literacy. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Campos, V., A. J. Franco-Mariscal, and A. Blaco-López. 2020. “Integration of Scientific Practices into daily-living Contexts: A Framework for the Desig of teaching-learning Sequences.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (15): 2574–2600. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1821932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCDE (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy. A Framework for PISA 2006. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/39732471.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ortega-Alonso, D. 2018. “¿Libro de artista o cuaderno de campo?: Aproximación A/R/Tográfica al dibujo naturalista [Artist’s book or field notebook?: A/R/Thographic approach to naturalistic drawing].” Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural 112: 141–152. doi:10.29077/bol/112/v01_ortega.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 2014. “Intelligence, Dual Coding Theory, and the Brain.” Intelligence 47: 141–158. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler, C., and F. X. Bogner. 2006. “Cognitive Achievements in Identification Skills.” Journal of Biological Education 40 (4): 161–165. doi:10.1080/00219266.2006.9656038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler, C., and B. Knape. 2007. “Comparison of a Dichotomous, language-based with an Illustrated Identification Key for Animal Tracks and Signs.” Journal of Science Education 8: 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C. 2008. “Teaching Species Identification – A Prerequisite for Learning Biodiversity and Understanding Ecology.” EURASIA, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 4 (3): 223–231. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75344.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, I., and M. Romero Rosales.2015.Biology and Geology 1.° ESO. Teacher’s Book.Madrid: Oxford University Press España. S.A
   Google Scholar
• Rouaux, J. 2014. “Dibujando Bichos: La Ilustración Científica En la Entomología [Drawing Bugs: Scientific Illustration in Entomology].” Revista Museo 27: 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sammet, R., H. Andres, and D. Dreesmann. 2015. “Human–insect Relationships: An ANTless Story? Children’s, Adolescents’, and Young Adults’ Ways of Characterizing Social Insects.” Anthrozoös 28: 247–261. doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.11435400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Bayo, F., and K. A. G. Wyckhuys. 2019. “Worldwide Decline of the Entomofauna: A Review of Its Drivers.” Biology Conservation 232: 8–2. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, J., G. Breuer, and R. Rupf. 2015. “Local Insects as Flagship Species to Promote Nature Conservation? A Survey among Primary School Children on Their Attitudes toward Invertebrates.” Anthrozoös 28 (2): 229–245. doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.11435399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidgall, S. P., A. Eitel, and K. Scheiter. 2019. “Why Do Learners Who Draw Perform Well? Investigating the Role of Visualization, Generation and Externalization in learner-generated Drawing.” Learning and Instruction 60: 138–153. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, N. J., and R. D. Bixler. 2017. “Beautiful Bugs, Bothersome Bugs, and FUN Bugs: Examining Human Interactions with Insects and Other Arthropods.” Anthrozoös 30 (3): 357–372. doi:10.1080/08927936.2017.1335083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snaddon, J. L., and E. C. Turner. 2007. “A Child’s Eye View of the Insect World: Perceptions of Insect Diversity.” Environmental Conservation 34 (1): 33–35. doi:10.1017/S0376892907003669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquati, J., K. Cutler, D. Gilkerson, and S. Sarver. 2013. ”Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions of Nature, Science, and Environmental Education”. Early Education and Development 24 (5): 721–743. doi:10.1080/10409289.2012.725383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Weelie, D., and A. Wals. 2002. “Making Biodiversity Meaningful through Environmental Education.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (11): 1143–1156. doi:10.1080/09500690210134839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, R. S. 2013. “Arachnophobic Entomologists: When Two More Legs Make a Big Difference.” American Entomologist 59 (3): 168–175. doi:10.1093/ae/59.3.168.
   Google Scholar
• Vigotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagler, R. 2010. “The Association between Preservice Elementary Teacher Animal Attitude and Likelihood of Animal Incorporation in Future Science Curriculum.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 5 (3): 353–375.
   Google Scholar
• Wagler, R., and A. Wagler. 2011. “Arthropods: Attitude and Incorporation in Preservice Elementary Teachers.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 6: 229–250. doi:10.1006/bijl.2000.0468.
   Google Scholar
• Wagler, R., and A. Wagler. 2012. “External Insect Morphology: A Negative Factor in Attitudes toward Insects and Likelihood of Incorporation in Future Science Education Settings.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 7: 313–325. doi:10.12973/ijese.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., and P. S. Dixon. 2013. ”Impact of Garden-Based Learning on Academic Outcomes in Schools: Synthesis of Research Between 1990 and 2010”. Review of Educational Research 83 (2): 211–235. doi:10.3102/0034654313475824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. E., and L. U. Bradbury. 2016. “The Pedagogical Potential of Drawing and Writing in a Primary Science Multimodal Unit.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (17): 2621–2641. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1255369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., and L. Y. Arnau. 2007. “Los Métodos Para la Enseñanza de Las Competencias Deben Tener Un Enfoque Globalizador [Methods for Teaching Competencies Must Have a Global Approach.” In 11 ideas clave. Cómo aprender y enseñar competencias, edited by A. Zabala and Y. L. Arnau (Coords.), 163–191, Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar