Not all Bloom and gloom: assessing constructive alignment, higher order cognitive skills, and their influence on students’ perceived learning within the practical components of an undergraduate biology course

References

• Adams, C. J. 2020. “A Constructively Aligned First-Year Laboratory Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 97 (7): 1863–1873. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D., and K. Tanner. 2002. “Approaches to Cell Biology Teaching: Questions about Questions.” Cell Biology Education 1 (3): 63–67. doi:10.1187/cbe.02-07-0021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, O., and D. Krathwhol. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning. Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives). New York: Addision Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Beyond Multiple Choice (2021). “Conference Agenda.” Accessed December 13 2021. http://beyond-multiple-choice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BMC2021-Agenda-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32 (3): 347–364. doi:10.1007/Bf00138871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.”New York: Longmans Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A. M. 2005. “Assessment of Learning with multiple-choice Questions.” Nurse Education in Practice 5 (4): 238–242. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2004.12.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis”.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neurophysical, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71.American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13620-004
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 1997. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. ”Mixed-method research: Introduction and application.” In Handbook of educational policy, pp. 455–472 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X. Academic press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., C. Dirks, M. P. Wenderoth, and M. Sundberg. 2008. “Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 7 (4): 368–381. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetrulias, D. A. M., and L. E. McCubbin. 1982. “Constructing Test Questions for Higher Level Thinking.” Nurse Educator 7 (5): 13–17. doi:10.1097/00006223-198200750-00003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Entwistle, A., and N. Entwistle. 1992. “Experiences of Understanding in Revising for Degree Examinations.” Learning and Instruction 2 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(92)90002-4.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, K. L., G. S. Matkin, M. E. Burbach, C. E. Quinn, and H. Harding. 2012. “Deficient Critical Thinking Skills among College Graduates: Implications for Leadership.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (2): 212–230. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00672.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., P. Brickman, and M. Lutz. 2012. “Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates.” Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments CBE—Life Sciences Education 11 (4): 364–377. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, B. 2015. “Paradigms, Philosophical Prisms and Pragmatism in HRD Research.” In In Handbook of Research Methods on Human Resource Development. Edward Elgar Publishing 13–31 . doi:10.4337/9781781009246.00009
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, J., W. Huitt, R. Michael, and L. Walters. 1994. “What You Measure Is What You Get.” GaASCD Newsletter: The Reporter 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. 2013. “E-assessment: Past, Present and Future.” New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences 9: 87–106. doi:10.11120/ndir.2013.00009.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, H., and A. Pina. 2021. “Strategically Addressing the Soft Skills Gap among STEM Undergraduates.” Journal of Research in STEM Education 7 (1): 21–46. doi:10.51355/jstem.2021.99.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and C. McNaught. 2007. Enhancing University Teaching: Lessons from Research into award-winning Teachers. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203962947
   Google Scholar
• Kunen, S., R. Cohen, and R. Solman. 1981. “A levels-of-processing Analysis of Bloom’s Taxonomy.” Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (2): 202. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.2.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber, J., A. Renkl, M. Nückles, and K. Wäschle. 2018. “When the Type of Assessment Counteracts Teaching for Understanding.” Learning: Research and Practice 4 (2): 161–179. doi:10.1080/23735082.2017.1285422.
   Google Scholar
• Lemons, P. P., and J. D. Lemons. 2013. “Questions for Assessing Higher-Order Cognitive Skills: It’s Not Just Bloom’s.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 12 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manalo, E., T. Kusumi, M. Koyasu, Y. Michita, and Y. Tanaka. 2015. “Do Students from Different Cultures Think Differently about Critical and Other Thinking Skills?” The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (New York: Palgrave Macmillan) 299–316. doi:10.1057/9781137378057_19.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I—Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, J. C., B. S. Hulsmeyer, M. E. Pike, K. Leichty, M. T. Miller, and A. L. Verst. 2001. “Assessment of multiple-choice Questions in Selected Test Banks Accompanying Text Books Used in Nursing Education.” Journal of Nursing Education 40 (1): 25–32. doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20010101-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., and J. Aldridge. 2019. “Weaving an Interpretivist Stance Throughout Mixed Methods Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 42 (3): 225–238. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miri, B., B.-C. David, and Z. Uri. 2007. “Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of higher-order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking.” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 353–369. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen, J. L., T. M. Long, S. A. Wyse, and D. Ebert-May. 2010. “Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 9 (4): 435–440. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-01-0001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. M. 2008. “Evaluating University Teaching and Learning in an outcome-based Model: Replanting Bloom.”
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. 2005. “Challenging the Primacy of Lectures: The Dissonance between Theory and Practice in University Teaching.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 2 (1): 2. doi:10.53761/1.2.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., and P. D. Umbach. 2006. “Student Survey Response Rates across Institutions: Why Do They Vary?” Research in Higher Education 47 (2): 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8887-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roßnagel, S., N. F. Christian, and K. Lo Baido. 2020. “Constructive Alignment and the Learning Experience: Relationships with Student Motivation and Perceived Learning Demands.” Higher Education Research & Development 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1787956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, F. J., and A. Ahlgren. 1990. Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. 2013. “Involving Students in the Scholarship of Assessment.” Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students 102–134.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, M., T. Overton, C. Thompson, and G. Rayner. 2016. “Graduate Employability: Views of Recent Science Graduates and Employers.” International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (Formerly CAL-laborate International) 24 (3):31-48.
   Google Scholar
• Semsar, K., and J. Casagrand. 2017. “Bloom’s Dichotomous Key: A New Tool for Evaluating the Cognitive Difficulty of Assessments.” Advances in Physiology Education 41 (1): 170–177. doi:10.1152/advan.00101.2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., N. R. Nielsen, and H. A. Schweingruber. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate. Science and Engineering National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13362
   Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J. N., F. A. Maratos, J. Elander, T. E. Hunt, K. Y. F. Cheung, and A. V. Aubeeluck. 2017. “Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (Critt): A Measure of Student Attitudes and Beliefs about Critical Thinking.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 23: 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., and P. Canfield. 2007. Learning to Be a Scholarly Teaching Faculty: Cultural Change through Shared Leadership. Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, L. 2002. “Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy: Evidence from Four Institutional Case Studies.” The Journal of Higher Education 73 (6): 740–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl, J. D., K. N. Sripathi, E. Meir, J. Merrill, M. Urban-Lurain, and K. C. Haudek. 2021. “Automated Writing Assessments Measure Undergraduate Learning after Completion of a computer-based Cellular Respiration Tutorial.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 20: 3. doi:10.1187/cbe.20-06-0122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloski, J. J., H. K. Rabinowitz, M. R. Robeson, and P. R. Young. 1999. “Patients Don’t Present with Five Choices: An Alternative to multiple-choice Tests in Assessing Physicians’ Competence.” Academic Medicine 74 (5): 539–546. doi:10.1097/00001888-199905000-00022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. Y., Y. L. Su, S. Cheung, E. Wong, and T. Kwong. 2013. “An Exploration of Biggs’ Constructive Alignment in Course Design and Its Impact on Students’ Learning Approaches.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 477–491. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.658018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design, 13–34. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, A. Y., J. K. Lawhorn, T. Lumley, and S. Freeman. 2008. “Assessment - Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy Debunks the “MCAT Myth”.” Science 319 (5862): 414–415. doi:10.1126/science.1147852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, U. 1993. “Are Lecture and Learning Compatible - Maybe for Locs - Unlikely for Hocs”. Journal of Chemical Education 70 (3): 195–197. doi:10.1021/ed070p195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, U. 2016. ”From Algorithmic Science Teaching to “Know” to Research-Based Transformative Inter-Transdisciplinary Learning to “Think”: Problem Solving in the STES/STEM and Sustainability Contexts.” In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, C. Constantinou edited by Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning. Contributions from Science Education ResearchVol. 2. Springer: Cham. 10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_11
   Google Scholar